Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

0 likes•83 views

A process to include standardized funder and author identifiers into institutional repository and ILS records which are associated with funded research data

Recommended for you

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Worl...

Forging a Path for Linked Open Data at the DPLA Gretchen Guegen, Data Services Coordinator, Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NISO Training Thursday Crafting a Scientific Data Management Plan

Feb 26 NISO Training Thursday Crafting a Scientific Data Management Plan About the Training Addressing a data management plan for the first time can be an intimidating exercise. Join NISO for a hands-on workshop that will guide you through the elements of creating a data management plan, including gathering necessary information, identifying needed resources, and navigating potential pitfalls. Participants explore the important components of a data management plan and critique excerpts of sample plans provided by the instructors. This session is meant to be a guided, step-by-step session that will follow the February 18 NISO Virtual Conference, Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Institution and its Intellectual Wealth. About the Instructors Kiyomi D. Deards, MSLIS, Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries Jennifer Thoegersen, Data Curation Librarian, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Varnum Tracking Link Origins Working Group

This presentation was provided by Ken Varnum of the University of Michigan during a NISO webinar, Tracing Discovery and Subsequent Use, held on Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017.

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

niso webinardiscovery servicespublishing

Identifying Funders
◎ “Funded by NSF #1664061”
○ Which directorate, division, etc. is that?
◎ If someone just lists “USDA” on their proposal, is it Agricultural Research
Services, National Institute of Food and Agriculture? Something else?

QUESTION???
Do you capture the funder in your repository?
◎ A: YES, Always
◎ B: NO, Never, we don’t have time/resources/ability in our system
◎ C: YES, But only when provided, and only what’s listed
◎ D: NO, - Some other reason

Recommended for you

NIH BD2K DataMed metadata model - Force11, 2016

Overview and status of the NIH BD2K DataMed metadata model: https://biocaddie.org/group/working-group/working-group-3-descriptive-metadata-datasets

•by Susanna-Assunta Sansone

open datadata standardsmetadata

NISO Working Group Connection Live! Research Data Metrics Landscape: An Updat...

This document summarizes a presentation on research data metrics from the NISO Altmetrics Working Group B. It discusses various metrics for research data, including citations of datasets and metadata, full-text search of datasets, downloads, and usage statistics. It also describes projects from DataCite and the Making Data Count initiative that are working to develop standard metrics for research data and make them available via APIs. Future work discussed includes analyzing networks of linked datasets and second-order citations.

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

separate tags by commas

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Wor...

Should We Expect a Bang or a Whimper? Will Linked Data Revolutionize Scholar Authoring and Workflow Tools? Jeff Baer, Senior Director of Product Management, Research Development Services, Proquest

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Why We Cared & What We did
◎ Controlled Vocabulary/Consistent Entry of Funders:
○ Simplifies Reporting
○ Reduces Duplicate Effort – capture it as it’s created, don’t have to go back later
○ Illustrates impact of funding from agencies
○ Enable Linked Data – not yet…but we’ll be ready
◎ Examined what was available
◎ Chose to use CrossRef and ISNI
◎May be new player soon (OrgID?)

Problems we faced…
◎ Which funder identifier to use?
○ CrossRef
○ ISNI
○ Both!
◎ No clear, human readable name with adequate detail
○ Create in-house controlled vocabulary
◎ Not every funder listed by both CrossRef and ISNI
○ No ISNI for NSF, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)

Sources Consulted
◎Bilder, G., Brown, J., & Demeranville, T. (2016). Organisation identifiers: current provider survey. Retrieved
from https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/ckfinder/userfiles/files/20161031%20OrgIDProviderSurvey.pdf
◎Dappert, A., Farquhar, A., Kotarski, R., & Hewlett, K. (2017). Connecting the Persistent Identifier
Ecosystem: Building the Technical and Human Infrastructure for Open Research. Data Science Journal, 16.
https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-028
◎Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Demeranville, T., & Bilder, G. (2016, October). Technical Considerations for an
Organization Identifier Registry. Retrieved from
https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/ckfinder/userfiles/files/20161031%20Functional%20Reqts%20OrgIDs.pdf
◎Ferguson, N., Moore, R., & Schmoller, S. (2015). Review of selected organisational IDs and development
of use cases for the Jisc CASRAI-UK Organisational Identifiers Working Group. Retrieved from
http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5853/
◎Shanks, J., & Arlitsch, K. (2016). Making Sense of Researcher Services. Journal of Library Administration,
56(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2016.1146534

Recommended for you

Putnam Data Quality and the IR

This presentation was provided by Nathan Putnam of OCLC during the NISO Training Thursday webinar, Metadata and the IR, held on Feb 23, 2017.

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

niso training thursdayinstitutional repositoriesmetadata

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

February 18 2015 NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Institution and its Intellectual Wealth Improving Integrity, Transparency, and Reproducibility Through Connection of the Scholarly Workflow Andrew Sallans, Partnerships, Collaborations, and Funding, Center for Open Science

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Bracke may4-1

This presentation was provided by Paul Bracke of Purdue University for a NISO webinar, Supporting Research on Your Campus, held on May 4, 2016

•by National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

nisoniso webinarresearch

What's hot

Re tooling for data management-support

Sherry Lake

This document summarizes Sherry Lake's presentation on re-tooling libraries to support data management. Some key points: - The University of Virginia restructured its research support model in 2010 to focus on data management and created the Scientific Data Consulting Group. - Other models discussed include groups at Purdue, Johns Hopkins, Cornell, Wisconsin, and Rutgers that provide data management consulting and services. - Re-skilling existing staff involves training librarians through courses, workshops, and data interviews to build expertise in areas like data formats, metadata, and data management plans. - Multiple areas of competency are important for supporting research data, including information science, computer science, domain expertise, management

Labou "Data Science and the Library at UC San Diego"

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Snac webinar v3

Brian Tingle

This document discusses a research project that developed tools to extract biographical authority records from archival finding aids. The project built a large test corpus of Encoded Archival Context - Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families (EAC-CPF) records and created a prototype system to access these records. Future directions discussed include integrating the merged data back into archival access systems, scaling up the sources of archival finding aids, and adding more linked open data.

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Worl...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NISO Training Thursday Crafting a Scientific Data Management Plan

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Varnum Tracking Link Origins Working Group

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NIH BD2K DataMed metadata model - Force11, 2016

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

NISO Working Group Connection Live! Research Data Metrics Landscape: An Updat...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Wor...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Putnam Data Quality and the IR

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Bracke may4-1

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

A Perspective on Wikidata: Ecosystems, Trust, and Usability

Robert Sanderson

An Introduction to EZID

University of California Curation Center

"Cool" metadata for FAIR data

Research Data Alliance

April 8 NISO Webinar: Experimenting with BIBFRAME: Reports from Early Adopters

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

NISO Webinar: Experimenting with BIBFRAME: Reports from Early Adopters About the Webinar In May 2011, the Library of Congress officially launched a new modeling initiative, Bibliographic Framework Initiative, as a linked data alternative to MARC. The Library then announced in November 2012 the proposed model, called BIBFRAME. Since then, the library world is moving from mainly theorizing about the BIBFRAME model to attempts to implement practical experimentation and testing. This experimentation is iterative, and continues to shape the model so that it’s stable enough and broadly acceptable enough for adoption. In this webinar, several institutions will share their progress in experimenting with BIBFRAME within their library system. They will discuss the existing, developing, and planned projects happening at their institutions. Challenges and opportunities in exploring and implementing BIBFRAME in their institutions will be discussed as well. Agenda Introduction Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO Experimental Mode: The National Library of Medicine and experiences with BIBFRAME Nancy Fallgren, Metadata Specialist Librarian, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Exploring BIBFRAME at a Small Academic Library Jeremy Nelson, Metadata and Systems Librarian, Colorado College Working with BIBFRAME for discovery and production: Linked data for Libraries/Linked Data for Production Nancy Lorimer, Head, Metadata Dept, Stanford University Libraries

DataShare for UC Campuses

University of California Curation Center

This document provides an overview of DataShare, a system being developed to facilitate research data sharing across the University of California campuses. It begins with background on goals of catalyzing data sharing and lowering barriers. There is then a demo of the UCSF DataShare instance, along with technical details of the system components and interactions for depositing and downloading data. Other details covered include branding, customization, costs, and governance agreements. The document concludes with discussion of next steps, including potential additional features, communication plans, and timelines for getting initial instances set up and customized at each campus.

Levine - Data Curation; Ethics and Legal Considerations

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

INSTRUCT - Integrated Structural Biology Infrastructure

Research Data Alliance

This document discusses challenges and opportunities around data management for integrated structural biology research. It notes that structural biology projects often use multiple experimental techniques and facilities, generating data in different formats. There is a need for metadata standards and repositories that can integrate diverse structural biology data types. A proposed solution is a virtual research environment portal that provides collaborative data sharing, processing and analysis tools, along with mechanisms for data quality control, citation and recognition. Such a system could help address the challenges of managing multi-technique structural biology data throughout the research lifecycle.

Manage your online profile: Maximize the visibility of your work and make an ...

Julia Gelfand

This document summarizes a presentation on managing your online profile to maximize the visibility and impact of your work. It discusses using online tools to share research, creating profiles on services like Scopus and Google Scholar to increase citations and discoverability. It also covers measuring impact through bibliometrics and altmetrics, making work open access through institutional or subject repositories, and using identifiers like ORCID to disambiguate authors. The presentation provides resources for authors to promote their work and research online.

What's hot (20)

Re tooling for data management-support

Labou "Data Science and the Library at UC San Diego"

Snac webinar v3

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Worl...

NISO Training Thursday Crafting a Scientific Data Management Plan

Varnum Tracking Link Origins Working Group

NIH BD2K DataMed metadata model - Force11, 2016

NISO Working Group Connection Live! Research Data Metrics Landscape: An Updat...

NISO/NFAIS Joint Virtual Conference: Connecting the Library to the Wider Wor...

Putnam Data Quality and the IR

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

Bracke may4-1

A Perspective on Wikidata: Ecosystems, Trust, and Usability

An Introduction to EZID

"Cool" metadata for FAIR data

April 8 NISO Webinar: Experimenting with BIBFRAME: Reports from Early Adopters

DataShare for UC Campuses

Levine - Data Curation; Ethics and Legal Considerations

INSTRUCT - Integrated Structural Biology Infrastructure

Manage your online profile: Maximize the visibility of your work and make an ...

Similar to Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs

LIASA-HELIG ORCID Webinar

ORCID, Inc

Building Open Research Infrastructure with PIDs

ETH-Bibliothek

Why and How Funders are using ORCID iDs

ORCID, Inc

Mejias "Making it work globally"

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

ORCID: Connecting Research and Researchers

ORCID, Inc

- ORCID provides a free, non-proprietary registry of persistent unique identifiers for researchers called ORCID iDs. Over 875,000 iDs have been issued since 2012. - ORCID iDs are embedded in research systems like repositories, CRIS, and publishers. ORCID has APIs that enable interoperable exchange of information between systems. - Many universities, funders, and publishers are integrating ORCID to identify researchers and link them to their works, affiliations, and grants. This helps simplify reporting, publishing, and connecting researchers to their works.

Attribution From Res Lib Perspective - Micah Altman, MIT

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Persistent Identifiers in Research Management: People, Places and Things

ORCID, Inc

1) Persistent identifiers like ORCID provide unique identifiers for people, organizations, and research outputs to enable linking of research information and disambiguation of entities. 2) Adoption of identifiers requires coordination across the research community through integration into systems and collaboration on standards. 3) Over 800,000 identifiers have been issued by ORCID since 2012, with adoption across publishers, universities, funders and other research organizations seeking to simplify processes and better connect information.

Orcid for funders_audio transcription

ARDC

FSCI Persistent Identifiers

ARDC

- Persistent identifiers (PIDs) play a key role in discoverability, accessibility, and reproducibility of research by providing long-lasting references to digital resources like publications, data, software, and people. - There are many PID systems that vary in purpose, governance, metadata collected, and other factors such as Handles, DOIs, and ORCIDs. DOIs are most widely used for research data. - When choosing a PID, factors to consider include purpose, scope, underlying technology, governance, and trustworthiness to ensure the PID remains long-lasting. It is important that PID systems and their social infrastructure are maintained to avoid failures.

Your Work is Distinctive, What about Your Name? Japan Library Fair 2014

ORCID, Inc

ORCID Today and Tomorrow (L. Haak, A. Meadows, L. Paglione)

ORCID, Inc

This document summarizes an ORCID outreach meeting that took place in November 2015. It discusses ORCID's mission to provide unique identifiers for researchers and link their activities like publications, grants, and affiliations. Over 1.7 million researchers have registered for an ORCID ID. The document outlines ORCID's current initiatives like the member support center, sign-in with other identities, peer review integration, and publication auto-updates. It also discusses ORCID's plans to strengthen engagement, scaling, stability, and policy development going forward.

Your Work is Distinctive, What About Your Name? - Laurel Haake (ORCID) - #OA...

QScience

ORCID identifiers in research workflows

Simeon Warner

ORCID identifiers provide a unique identifier for researchers and link their activities like publications, datasets, and grants. Over 1.1 million identifiers have been created since launch in just over 2 years. ORCID aims to be integrated into research workflows to reduce name ambiguity and save effort by pre-populating information. Publishers are beginning to include ORCID identifiers in publication metadata to improve discovery and allow updating researcher profiles. ORCID serves as a hub, linking other identifiers and profiles for a researcher across different systems and organizations.

Persistent Identifiers in the Authoring Process

ORCID, Inc

The document discusses how persistent identifiers like ORCID iDs can be integrated into the authoring and publishing process. It provides examples of how identifiers could be included at various stages from manuscript submission to published article. ORCID aims to be a central hub that connects different identifier systems and allows for interoperability between research organizations and systems. The document outlines how various stakeholders like publishers, funders, universities and repositories are integrating ORCID iDs to uniquely identify contributors and their works.

ORCID: Persistent Identifiers for Researchers and Contributors

ORCID, Inc

This document summarizes Laurel Haak's presentation on ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) at the CAUL/ANDS Roundtable in Canberra on July 29, 2014. ORCID aims to solve the problem of name ambiguity and lack of unique identifiers for researchers by providing a free, global registry of unique identifiers for individuals. Over 800,000 identifiers have been issued since 2012. ORCID works with various stakeholders like publishers, funders, and universities to integrate ORCID IDs and enable interoperability between systems through its APIs. The presentation provides examples of how various organizations are integrating ORCID into their workflows and systems.

Adoption and Integration of Persistent Identifiers in European Research Infor...

LIBER Europe

RDA Work Groups Outputs and Adoption - Early WG Report back session

Research Data Alliance

Transcript - DOIs to support citation of grey literature

ARDC

RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...

ASIS&T

This document summarizes Andi Ogier's experience providing data management plan (DMP) consulting at Virginia Tech over the past 2 years. It outlines the goals and timeline of DMP consulting services, things that have been done to educate researchers on DMPs, statistics on DMP consulting, logistics of the consulting process, feedback received from the National Science Foundation, and plans for the future of DMP consulting at Virginia Tech including more embedded consulting and leveraging new data repository services.

DistLODStats: Distributed Computation of RDF Dataset Statistics - ISWC 2018 talk

Gezim Sejdiu

Over the last years, the Semantic Web has been growing steadily. Today, we count more than 10,000 datasets made available online following Semantic Web standards. Nevertheless, many applications, such as data integration, search, and interlinking, may not take the full advantage of the data without having a priori statistical information about its internal structure and coverage. In fact, there are already a number of tools, which offer such statistics, providing basic information about RDF datasets and vocabularies. However, those usually show severe deficiencies in terms of performance once the dataset size grows beyond the capabilities of a single machine. In this paper, we introduce a software component for statistical calculations of large RDF datasets, which scales out to clusters of machines. More specifically, we describe the first distributed inmemory approach for computing 32 different statistical criteria for RDF datasets using Apache Spark. The preliminary results show that our distributed approach improves upon a previous centralized approach we compare against and provides approximately linear horizontal scale-up. The criteria are extensible beyond the 32 default criteria, is integrated into the larger SANSA framework and employed in at least four major usage scenarios beyond the SANSA community.

Similar to Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs (20)

LIASA-HELIG ORCID Webinar

Building Open Research Infrastructure with PIDs

Why and How Funders are using ORCID iDs

Mejias "Making it work globally"

ORCID: Connecting Research and Researchers

Attribution From Res Lib Perspective - Micah Altman, MIT

Persistent Identifiers in Research Management: People, Places and Things

Orcid for funders_audio transcription

FSCI Persistent Identifiers

Your Work is Distinctive, What about Your Name? Japan Library Fair 2014

ORCID Today and Tomorrow (L. Haak, A. Meadows, L. Paglione)

Your Work is Distinctive, What About Your Name? - Laurel Haake (ORCID) - #OA...

ORCID identifiers in research workflows

Persistent Identifiers in the Authoring Process

ORCID: Persistent Identifiers for Researchers and Contributors

Adoption and Integration of Persistent Identifiers in European Research Infor...

RDA Work Groups Outputs and Adoption - Early WG Report back session

Transcript - DOIs to support citation of grey literature

RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...

DistLODStats: Distributed Computation of RDF Dataset Statistics - ISWC 2018 talk

More from Andrea Payant

Avoiding a Level of Discontent in Finding Aids: An Analysis of User Engagemen...

Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs

Related slideshows

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs

Similar to Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs (20)

More from Andrea Payant

More from Andrea Payant (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDs

Editor's Notes