USU launched a program in 2016 to connect researchers seeking federal funding with librarians to assist them with data management. This program assisted over 100 researchers, but was it successful? Our presentation will discuss how we evaluated the success of this program using online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG) in conjunction with a traditional survey. Our cross-institutional research team will share our findings as well as the challenges and successes of using OAFGs to assess library services.
The presentation was provided by Angie Oehrli of the University of Michigan during the NISO Two-Part Webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 20, 2017
Read Surkis Facilitating Development of Research Data Services
This presentation was jointly given by Kevin Read and Alisa Surkis of New York University during the two-part NISO webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 20, 2017.
NISO/BISG Changing Standards Landscape: EBook Discovery and Requirements for ...
1) E-book collections are a large part of many library collections but can be difficult for users to discover due to lack of metadata and disconnected management systems.
2) New opportunities exist to improve e-book discovery through unified knowledgebases, automated metadata feeds from publishers, and direct integration between knowledgebases and discovery services.
3) Libraries can benefit from reduced manual effort in managing e-book holdings and more timely access to e-books in discovery systems through automated processes for updating title lists and status changes.
Goldman "Collaboratively Build Data Science Services and Skills"
This presentation was provided by Julie Goldman of Harvard University, during part two of the NISO two-part webinar "Building Data Science Skills: Strategic Support for the Work, Part Two," which was held on March 18, 2020.
Enhancing DMPTool: Further Streamlineing Data Mangement Planning Process
The document discusses enhancements to the DMPTool to further streamline the data management planning process. DMPTool2 will add new features like co-ownership of plans, self-service administration, and optional plan review. It will have improved governance and be jointly developed by additional partners. The goal is to better support the creation of data management plans, which are increasingly required for funding and publication.
Cook "Using Library Assessment Data in Senior Decision Making: A Perspective ...
This presentation was provided by Colleen Cook of McGill University, during Session Seven of the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics in a 21st Century Pandemic," held on October 30, 2020.
This talk was provided by Brian Lowe of Ontocale SRL during the NISO Virtual Conference, Using Open Source in Your Institution, held on February 17, 2016
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
R. David Lankes, Dean’s Scholar for the New Librarianship at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies; Director of the Information Institute of Syracuse
This presentation was provided by Jill Emery of Portland State University during a NISO webinar on the topic of OA and acquisitions, delivered on Sept 7, 2016
Melissa McLimans, a Community Liaison / Service Specialist who spends much of her time working in WiLS consulting services, traveled to Lake Geneva to present “Data Driven Libraries (link)” at the Lakeshore Library System’s Annual Trustees Dinner. As attendees enjoyed a lovely meal, Melissa shared examples of innovative and practical uses of data, including data dashboards and other methods to improve library decision-making process. Many of the examples came from WiLS’ strategic planning experiences or from libraries and library systems who are using data to make the best decisions possible.
Many thanks to Lakeshore Library System’s Director, Steve Ohs, for the invitation and opportunity to talk data!
If you have any questions or you're interested in learning more about Melissa's work, contact her at melissa@wils.org.
Webb -- Libraries Supporting Media and Data Literacy
This presentation was provided by Katy Kavanagh Webb of East Carolina University during the first portion of the NISO two-part webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 13, 2017
Expert engagement: practical researcher digital literacy provision at City - ...
This document discusses efforts by a research librarian at City University London to improve digital literacy support for researchers. The librarian conducted a questionnaire that informed the development of a Library Researcher Development Programme. A blog and case study resource were also created. Based on researcher feedback, workshops were held on topics like using social media and open access publishing. The librarian is now conducting further research to identify factors influencing researchers' digital literacy in order to guide future instruction. The conclusion emphasizes engaging researchers and using their work to enhance information literacy support through research-based practice.
Reveal Digital: innovative library crowdfunding model for open access digita...
Slides from a webinar held on 1 Dec 2016 by Jisc and Reveal Digital on Reveal Digital's library crowdfunding model for their Independent Voices digital collection. This includes information on pledging fees for UK universities as negotiated by Jisc Collections. A recording of the webinar is available at https://goo.gl/kEHRrD.
Warren & Rauh Creating a Culture of Research Reputation
This presentation was provided by Scott Warren and Anne Rauh of Syracuse University during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Slides | Targeting the librarian’s role in research services
Slides from the Nov. 8, 2016 Library Connect webinar "Targeting the librarian’s role in research services" with Nina Exner, Amanda Horsman and Mark Reed. See the full webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=223121
The benefits and challenges of open access: lessons from practice - Helen Bla...
Led by Helen Blanchett, subject specialist, scholarly communications, Jisc.
With contribution from Andrew Simpson, associate university librarian (procurement and metadata and systems), Portsmouth University.
In this session you’ll hear in this session you’ll hear about the benefits and challenges of open access.
Connect more in London, 28 June 2016
This document summarizes the Library Impact Data Project, which aimed to show correlations between library usage data (books borrowed, e-resources accessed) and student attainment across multiple universities. Phase 1 found statistical significance between library usage and grades. Phase 2 added more student data points and found further correlations with demographics. The project aims to create a shared analytics service to allow libraries to analyze usage and benchmark against peers. Key areas for the next phase include developing an intuitive dashboard, addressing ethical issues around profiling individuals, and integrating additional data sources.
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
Athenaeum21 presents three case studies of assessment and evaluation programs in libraries--one past, one current, and one future. The cases use three different modes of data gathering and analysis to show the power of understanding user needs and how well your organization is meeting them.
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
This session will provide three case studies of assessment and evaluation programs in libraries--one past, one current, and one future. The cases use three different modes of data gathering and analysis and show the power of understanding user needs and how well your organization is meeting them.
This study evaluated the impact of an information literacy course on preservice teachers' skills. It compared a treatment group of 16 students who took the course to a comparison group of 10 students who did not. Both groups completed a questionnaire and thinking-aloud tasks involving finding articles, evaluating websites, and selecting Web 2.0 tools. Results showed the treatment group performed better on skills tests and demonstrated more familiarity with resources. However, neither group excellently completed all tasks. The study concluded that while the course helped, an enhanced long-term instruction program is needed to fully develop teachers' twenty-first century information literacy abilities.
Stepping stones to ‘big data’: supporting quantitative methods teaching with ...
This document summarizes a presentation about supporting quantitative methods teaching with large survey data. It discusses the UK Data Service, which provides access to social science data. Understanding Society, a large longitudinal survey of 40,000 UK households, is highlighted as a potentially useful teaching resource. The presentation describes creating short videos, guides, teaching datasets and materials to make Understanding Society more accessible for teaching. These resources aim to introduce students to large datasets and quantitative analysis in a straightforward way, providing a stepping stone to working with larger "Big Data" sources. Case studies show how other universities have successfully used survey data for methods teaching.
This document provides an overview of Therese Kennelly Okraku's research prospectus on scientific collaboration and barriers at a university. The research will use mixed methods including surveys, interviews, social network analysis, and participant observation to identify barriers to collaboration, evaluate how tenure influences collaboration, develop metrics for impact beyond academia, and identify emerging research fields. The research is being conducted at the University of Florida and aims to provide recommendations to reduce barriers and better recognize team science in order to encourage collaboration.
Powerpoint on Survey Development in libraries by LIS 2830 students Dana Alsup, Katie DeRusso, Michele Farina,
Sarah Loudenslager, Sara Tekavec (Spring 2011).
This report summarizes the findings of a needs assessment conducted by the IT Resource Sharing Group regarding operational and reporting needs for student data at the University of Washington. The assessment found that while Schools share many common information needs, they also have unique needs. It also found a lack of awareness about existing central systems and a proliferation of "shadow systems" developed by individual units. The report concludes there is high frustration over access to and analysis of student data. It recommends acknowledging decentralized systems and creating processes to support secure and productive development across the university.
The document summarizes a research project conducted by the Cataloging and Metadata Services unit at Utah State University to analyze user search behavior and the performance of MARC records in search results. The project involved analyzing web logs of searches, scraping search results pages, and coding records and fields in Airtable. Key findings included that MARC records make up around 20% of search results on average, vendor records appear more often than locally created records, and the 245 and 505 fields were most important for retrieving records while the 505, 520 and 650 fields had the greatest impact if missing from records. Guidelines for cataloging practice were proposed based on the findings.
Crowdsourcing Metadata Practices at USUAndrea Payant
USU Libraries’ Cataloging and Metadata Unit has successfully investigated several methods to engage the public to involve them in the creation of metadata for USU’s Digital History Collections. Most, if not all the techniques we have tested have yielded positive results and have improved the relevancy and accuracy of our descriptive metadata.
The presentation was provided by Angie Oehrli of the University of Michigan during the NISO Two-Part Webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 20, 2017
This presentation was jointly given by Kevin Read and Alisa Surkis of New York University during the two-part NISO webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 20, 2017.
1) E-book collections are a large part of many library collections but can be difficult for users to discover due to lack of metadata and disconnected management systems.
2) New opportunities exist to improve e-book discovery through unified knowledgebases, automated metadata feeds from publishers, and direct integration between knowledgebases and discovery services.
3) Libraries can benefit from reduced manual effort in managing e-book holdings and more timely access to e-books in discovery systems through automated processes for updating title lists and status changes.
This presentation was provided by Julie Goldman of Harvard University, during part two of the NISO two-part webinar "Building Data Science Skills: Strategic Support for the Work, Part Two," which was held on March 18, 2020.
The document discusses enhancements to the DMPTool to further streamline the data management planning process. DMPTool2 will add new features like co-ownership of plans, self-service administration, and optional plan review. It will have improved governance and be jointly developed by additional partners. The goal is to better support the creation of data management plans, which are increasingly required for funding and publication.
This presentation was provided by Colleen Cook of McGill University, during Session Seven of the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics in a 21st Century Pandemic," held on October 30, 2020.
This talk was provided by Brian Lowe of Ontocale SRL during the NISO Virtual Conference, Using Open Source in Your Institution, held on February 17, 2016
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
R. David Lankes, Dean’s Scholar for the New Librarianship at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies; Director of the Information Institute of Syracuse
This presentation was provided by Jill Emery of Portland State University during a NISO webinar on the topic of OA and acquisitions, delivered on Sept 7, 2016
Melissa McLimans, a Community Liaison / Service Specialist who spends much of her time working in WiLS consulting services, traveled to Lake Geneva to present “Data Driven Libraries (link)” at the Lakeshore Library System’s Annual Trustees Dinner. As attendees enjoyed a lovely meal, Melissa shared examples of innovative and practical uses of data, including data dashboards and other methods to improve library decision-making process. Many of the examples came from WiLS’ strategic planning experiences or from libraries and library systems who are using data to make the best decisions possible.
Many thanks to Lakeshore Library System’s Director, Steve Ohs, for the invitation and opportunity to talk data!
If you have any questions or you're interested in learning more about Melissa's work, contact her at melissa@wils.org.
This presentation was provided by Katy Kavanagh Webb of East Carolina University during the first portion of the NISO two-part webinar, Digital and Data Literacy, held on September 13, 2017
This document discusses efforts by a research librarian at City University London to improve digital literacy support for researchers. The librarian conducted a questionnaire that informed the development of a Library Researcher Development Programme. A blog and case study resource were also created. Based on researcher feedback, workshops were held on topics like using social media and open access publishing. The librarian is now conducting further research to identify factors influencing researchers' digital literacy in order to guide future instruction. The conclusion emphasizes engaging researchers and using their work to enhance information literacy support through research-based practice.
Reveal Digital: innovative library crowdfunding model for open access digita...PaolaMarchionni
Slides from a webinar held on 1 Dec 2016 by Jisc and Reveal Digital on Reveal Digital's library crowdfunding model for their Independent Voices digital collection. This includes information on pledging fees for UK universities as negotiated by Jisc Collections. A recording of the webinar is available at https://goo.gl/kEHRrD.
This presentation was provided by Scott Warren and Anne Rauh of Syracuse University during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Slides | Targeting the librarian’s role in research servicesLibrary_Connect
Slides from the Nov. 8, 2016 Library Connect webinar "Targeting the librarian’s role in research services" with Nina Exner, Amanda Horsman and Mark Reed. See the full webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=223121
The benefits and challenges of open access: lessons from practice - Helen Bla...Jisc
Led by Helen Blanchett, subject specialist, scholarly communications, Jisc.
With contribution from Andrew Simpson, associate university librarian (procurement and metadata and systems), Portsmouth University.
In this session you’ll hear in this session you’ll hear about the benefits and challenges of open access.
Connect more in London, 28 June 2016
This document summarizes the Library Impact Data Project, which aimed to show correlations between library usage data (books borrowed, e-resources accessed) and student attainment across multiple universities. Phase 1 found statistical significance between library usage and grades. Phase 2 added more student data points and found further correlations with demographics. The project aims to create a shared analytics service to allow libraries to analyze usage and benchmark against peers. Key areas for the next phase include developing an intuitive dashboard, addressing ethical issues around profiling individuals, and integrating additional data sources.
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21Megan Hurst
Athenaeum21 presents three case studies of assessment and evaluation programs in libraries--one past, one current, and one future. The cases use three different modes of data gathering and analysis to show the power of understanding user needs and how well your organization is meeting them.
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital ResourcesChristine Madsen
This session will provide three case studies of assessment and evaluation programs in libraries--one past, one current, and one future. The cases use three different modes of data gathering and analysis and show the power of understanding user needs and how well your organization is meeting them.
This study evaluated the impact of an information literacy course on preservice teachers' skills. It compared a treatment group of 16 students who took the course to a comparison group of 10 students who did not. Both groups completed a questionnaire and thinking-aloud tasks involving finding articles, evaluating websites, and selecting Web 2.0 tools. Results showed the treatment group performed better on skills tests and demonstrated more familiarity with resources. However, neither group excellently completed all tasks. The study concluded that while the course helped, an enhanced long-term instruction program is needed to fully develop teachers' twenty-first century information literacy abilities.
This document summarizes a presentation about supporting quantitative methods teaching with large survey data. It discusses the UK Data Service, which provides access to social science data. Understanding Society, a large longitudinal survey of 40,000 UK households, is highlighted as a potentially useful teaching resource. The presentation describes creating short videos, guides, teaching datasets and materials to make Understanding Society more accessible for teaching. These resources aim to introduce students to large datasets and quantitative analysis in a straightforward way, providing a stepping stone to working with larger "Big Data" sources. Case studies show how other universities have successfully used survey data for methods teaching.
This document provides an overview of Therese Kennelly Okraku's research prospectus on scientific collaboration and barriers at a university. The research will use mixed methods including surveys, interviews, social network analysis, and participant observation to identify barriers to collaboration, evaluate how tenure influences collaboration, develop metrics for impact beyond academia, and identify emerging research fields. The research is being conducted at the University of Florida and aims to provide recommendations to reduce barriers and better recognize team science in order to encourage collaboration.
Powerpoint on Survey Development in libraries by LIS 2830 students Dana Alsup, Katie DeRusso, Michele Farina,
Sarah Loudenslager, Sara Tekavec (Spring 2011).
This report summarizes the findings of a needs assessment conducted by the IT Resource Sharing Group regarding operational and reporting needs for student data at the University of Washington. The assessment found that while Schools share many common information needs, they also have unique needs. It also found a lack of awareness about existing central systems and a proliferation of "shadow systems" developed by individual units. The report concludes there is high frustration over access to and analysis of student data. It recommends acknowledging decentralized systems and creating processes to support secure and productive development across the university.
There are many online and in-person courses available for librarians to learn about research data management, data analysis, and visualization, but after you have taken a course, how do you go about applying what you have learned? While it is possible to just start offering classes and consultations, your service will have a better chance of becoming relevant if you consider stakeholders and review your institutional environment. This lecture will give you some ideas to get started with data services at your institution.
Social science research methods for librariesCILIPScotland
This document provides an overview of social science research methods that are useful for libraries. It discusses why librarians should conduct research to support decisions within the field. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods are examined, including examples of different types of research questions, data collection methods, and challenges. Key aspects of the research process are also reviewed, such as developing a problem statement, conducting a literature review, choosing appropriate methodologies, and considering issues around data analysis.
In these webinar slides, librarians share their inspiration and process for developing high-impact library services. Presentations from Katy Kavanagh Webb, Assistant Professor | Head, Research and Instructional Services, J.Y. Joyner Library, East Carolina University; Donna Gibson, Director of Library Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center; and
J. William (Bill) Draper, Reference Librarian, Biddle Law Library, University of Pennsylvania Law School. View the webinar at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/library-connect-webinars?commid=255645
This presentation was provided by Clara Chu and Merinda Kaye Hensley of The University of Illinois, during Session Eight of the NISO event "Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century," held on December 6, 2019.
This document provides guidance on developing a knowledge mobilization plan. It defines knowledge mobilization and different related terms used across funding agencies. An effective plan must identify the research outcomes, target audiences and how they will be reached. It should also explain how impact will be evaluated over time. The plan requires determining appropriate knowledge products and resources like budgets, timelines, and ensuring open access of research outputs. Support services are available to help with workshops on clear writing, digital identity, and engaging events on social media. Developing a strong knowledge mobilization plan is important for sharing research broadly and creating real-world impact.
Function follows form: the paradigmatic potentialities of recommender systems and the role of paradata in effective user engagement with open education
This document discusses trends and importance of research in the current scenario. It discusses connecting research to oneself, one's institute, society and industry. It also discusses the concept of a "connected researcher" and trends related to collaboration, social media, and alternative metrics for measuring research impact. Connected researchers leverage tools like social media to build networks, get feedback, and disseminate their work more widely.
The document summarizes a study that investigated how librarians can support students' digital capabilities. It conducted interviews with stakeholders at a health faculty to understand their perceptions of digital literacy and the role of librarians. The study found that stakeholders mainly see librarians as teaching digital information literacy. However, there is potential for librarians to support other elements of digital literacy frameworks by collaborating in multidisciplinary teams and directly working with students. The qualitative research aimed to understand current practice and make recommendations for improving support of students' diverse digital needs.
RDAP14 Poster: Samantha Guss Data management planning and responsible conduct...ASIS&T
Data management planning and responsible conduct of research: a pilot educational partnership at NYU
Research Data Access & Preservation Summit
March 26-28, 2014
San Diego, CA
Samantha Guss, New York University
Similar to But Were We Successful: Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate Library Services (20)
Avoiding a Level of Discontent in Finding Aids: An Analysis of User Engagemen...Andrea Payant
As part of a multi-faceted research project examining user engagement with various types of descriptive metadata, Utah State University Libraries Cataloging and Metadata Services unit (CMS) investigated the discoverability of local Encoded Archival Description (EAD) finding aids. The research team put two versions of the same finding aid online with one described at the file (box or folder) level and the other at the item-level. Over a year later, the team pulled the analytics for each guide and assessed which descriptive level was most frequently accessed. The research team also looked at the type of search terms patrons utilized and wherein the finding aid they were located. Usage data shows that personal names are the most common type of search term, search terms are most commonly found in the Collection Inventory, and that the availability of item-level description improves discovery by an average of 6,100% over file-level descriptions.
How are MARC records performing in our search environment? This presentation will look at the process and results of a research project that analyzed how users’ search terms matched up with MARC fields, as well as how and where MARC records were displayed in search results lists. Presenters will discuss the process, the results of the project, and outline how attendees can implement similar research projects at their institutions, including tools and techniques they can use to analyze how their own records are surfacing in a search environment.
This document outlines best practices for building digital collections through community crowdsourcing efforts. It discusses strategies for gathering metadata and historical information from local communities in person through meetings with historical groups and individual interviews, as well as online through web forms and comments. Lessons learned include the importance of community partnerships, making the process approachable, and thanking contributors to encourage further participation.
The Missing Link: Metadata Conversion Workflows for EveryoneAndrea Payant
This document describes workflows developed by Utah State University and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas to streamline metadata creation between special collections and digital initiatives departments. The workflows allow for converting finding aid information into Dublin Core for uploading item records to a digital repository, and batch linking digitized content to finding aids. The processes are designed to be taught easily and performed by various staff levels to automate metadata work and make it more flexible.
Mitigating the Risk: identifying Strategic University Partnerships for Compli...Andrea Payant
Payant, A., Rozum, B., Woolcott, L. (2016). Mitigating the Risk: Identifying Strategic University Partnerships for Compliance Tracking of Research Data and Publications. International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) Satellite Conference: Data in Libraries: The Big Picture
Just Keep Cataloging: How One Cataloging Unit Changed Their Workflows to Fit ...Andrea Payant
Utah State University Libraries Cataloging and Metadata Services (CMS) unit, including student workers, transitioned to remote cataloging in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The presentation will outline the process undertaken by supervisors to evaluate and modify services and workflows to continue cataloging materials through the different phases of library capacity from shutting down most of the library, to a hybrid limited staff capacity, through staff back in the library full-time.
The document discusses research data management at Utah State University (USU). It provides a history of USU's data management efforts beginning in 2013 with the creation of a campus committee and the hiring of a Data Librarian in 2015. The librarians developed a compliance program to meet federal requirements for data sharing and launched it in 2016. They now provide standard resources like a website and consultations, as well as non-standard services like annual communication with researchers regarding data deposit requirements. The document concludes with suggestions for backing up data using the "Rule of 3," describing data adequately, and organizing data files and directories.
liwalaawiiloxhbakaa (How We Lived): The Grant Bulltail Absáalooke (Crow Natio...Andrea Payant
USU was selected to host a unique collection of oral histories from Grant Bulltail, Crow Storyteller and 2019 NEA National Heritage Fellow, representing the stories and knowledge of the Crow Nation as passed down by his ancestors. The collection spans 20+ years of field work and collaboration across library departments and regional partners.
Homeward Bound: How to Move an Entire Cataloging Unit to Remote WorkAndrea Payant
Utah State University Libraries Cataloging and Metadata Services (CMS) unit, including student workers, transitioned to remote cataloging in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This presentation will outline the process undertaken by supervisors to evaluate and modify services and workflows to continue cataloging service during the time when the library was shut down.
Memes of Resistance, Election Reflections, and Voices from Drug Court: Social...Andrea Payant
Folklorists and librarians have long championed social justice and advocacy issues. Today, the skills garnered through principled academic discourse, community based ethnographic fieldwork, and ethical librarianship are being utilized to collect, preserve, present, and educate around social themes and issues. USU folklorists and librarians are working to create robust digital collections that focus on timely social issues with informed and ethical metadata.
Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Author and Funder IDsAndrea Payant
A process to include standardized funder and author identifiers into institutional repository and ILS records which are associated with funded research data
VOCAB for Collaboration: How “Work Language” Can Help You Win at TeamworkAndrea Payant
Clair Canfield's VOCAB model provides a framework for effective collaboration through vulnerability, ownership, communication, acceptance, and boundaries. The document discusses each element of the model and provides tips for incorporating them into teamwork. It suggests taking time for reflection, setting group agreements, embracing different communication styles, taking accountability, and accepting realities outside of one's control. Practicing these concepts can help teams work through challenges, utilize individual strengths, and adapt to change.
ARK de Triumph: Linking Finding Aids & Digital Libraries Using a Low-Tech App...Andrea Payant
This document describes a low-tech approach developed by Utah State University to link finding aids to digital content using Archival Resource Keys (ARKs). The approach aims to make the process flexible and accessible to various library staff and student workers without requiring in-depth XML training. It utilizes common office tools like Excel and Word along with XML editors. Dublin Core metadata is used to meet standards for two different consortiums while ARKs serve as persistent identifiers independent of any digital repository system. Step-by-step workflows are documented for applying this approach to born-digital archival materials.
How to Handle the Separate Discount Account on Invoice in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, separate discount account can be set up to accurately track and manage discounts applied on various transaction and ensure precise financial reporting and analysis
Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC)- Concept, Features, Elements, Role of advertising in IMC
Advertising: Concept, Features, Evolution of Advertising, Active Participants, Benefits of advertising to Business firms and consumers.
Classification of advertising: Geographic, Media, Target audience and Functions.
Ardra Nakshatra (आर्द्रा): Understanding its Effects and RemediesAstro Pathshala
Ardra Nakshatra, the sixth Nakshatra in Vedic astrology, spans from 6°40' to 20° in the Gemini zodiac sign. Governed by Rahu, the north lunar node, Ardra translates to "the moist one" or "the star of sorrow." Symbolized by a teardrop, it represents the transformational power of storms, bringing both destruction and renewal.
About Astro Pathshala
Astro Pathshala is a renowned astrology institute offering comprehensive astrology courses and personalized astrological consultations for over 20 years. Founded by Gurudev Sunil Vashist ji, Astro Pathshala has been a beacon of knowledge and guidance in the field of Vedic astrology. With a team of experienced astrologers, the institute provides in-depth courses that cover various aspects of astrology, including Nakshatras, planetary influences, and remedies. Whether you are a beginner seeking to learn astrology or someone looking for expert astrological advice, Astro Pathshala is dedicated to helping you navigate life's challenges and unlock your full potential through the ancient wisdom of Vedic astrology.
For more information about their courses and consultations, visit Astro Pathshala.
Front Desk Management in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
Front desk officers are responsible for taking care of guests and customers. Their work mainly involves interacting with customers and business partners, either in person or through phone calls.
Principles of Roods Approach!!!!!!!.pptxibtesaam huma
Principles of Rood’s Approach
Treatment technique used in physiotherapy for neurological patients which aids them to recover and improve quality of life
Facilitatory techniques
Inhibitory techniques
Views in Odoo - Advanced Views - Pivot View in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, the pivot view is a graphical representation of data that allows users to analyze and summarize large datasets quickly. It's a powerful tool for generating insights from your business data.
The pivot view in Odoo is a valuable tool for analyzing and summarizing large datasets, helping you gain insights into your business operations.
The membership Module in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
Some business organizations give membership to their customers to ensure the long term relationship with those customers. If the customer is a member of the business then they get special offers and other benefits. The membership module in odoo 17 is helpful to manage everything related to the membership of multiple customers.
AI Risk Management: ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act, and ISO/IEC 23894PECB
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, understanding the complexities and regulations regarding AI risk management is more crucial than ever.
Amongst others, the webinar covers:
• ISO/IEC 42001 standard, which provides guidelines for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving AI management systems within organizations
• insights into the European Union's landmark legislative proposal aimed at regulating AI
• framework and methodologies prescribed by ISO/IEC 23894 for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with AI systems
Presenters:
Miriama Podskubova - Attorney at Law
Miriama is a seasoned lawyer with over a decade of experience. She specializes in commercial law, focusing on transactions, venture capital investments, IT, digital law, and cybersecurity, areas she was drawn to through her legal practice. Alongside preparing contract and project documentation, she ensures the correct interpretation and application of European legal regulations in these fields. Beyond client projects, she frequently speaks at conferences on cybersecurity, online privacy protection, and the increasingly pertinent topic of AI regulation. As a registered advocate of Slovak bar, certified data privacy professional in the European Union (CIPP/e) and a member of the international association ELA, she helps both tech-focused startups and entrepreneurs, as well as international chains, to properly set up their business operations.
Callum Wright - Founder and Lead Consultant Founder and Lead Consultant
Callum Wright is a seasoned cybersecurity, privacy and AI governance expert. With over a decade of experience, he has dedicated his career to protecting digital assets, ensuring data privacy, and establishing ethical AI governance frameworks. His diverse background includes significant roles in security architecture, AI governance, risk consulting, and privacy management across various industries, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: June 26, 2024
Tags: ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 23894
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join educators from the US and worldwide at this year’s conference, themed “Strategies for Proficiency & Acquisition,” to learn from top experts in world language teaching.
Split Shifts From Gantt View in the Odoo 17Celine George
Odoo allows users to split long shifts into multiple segments directly from the Gantt view.Each segment retains details of the original shift, such as employee assignment, start time, end time, and specific tasks or descriptions.
Is Email Marketing Really Effective In 2024?Rakesh Jalan
Slide 1
Is Email Marketing Really Effective in 2024?
Yes, Email Marketing is still a great method for direct marketing.
Slide 2
In this article we will cover:
- What is Email Marketing?
- Pros and cons of Email Marketing.
- Tools available for Email Marketing.
- Ways to make Email Marketing effective.
Slide 3
What Is Email Marketing?
Using email to contact customers is called Email Marketing. It's a quiet and effective communication method. Mastering it can significantly boost business. In digital marketing, two long-term assets are your website and your email list. Social media apps may change, but your website and email list remain constant.
Slide 4
Types of Email Marketing:
1. Welcome Emails
2. Information Emails
3. Transactional Emails
4. Newsletter Emails
5. Lead Nurturing Emails
6. Sponsorship Emails
7. Sales Letter Emails
8. Re-Engagement Emails
9. Brand Story Emails
10. Review Request Emails
Slide 5
Advantages Of Email Marketing
1. Cost-Effective: Cheaper than other methods.
2. Easy: Simple to learn and use.
3. Targeted Audience: Reach your exact audience.
4. Detailed Messages: Convey clear, detailed messages.
5. Non-Disturbing: Less intrusive than social media.
6. Non-Irritating: Customers are less likely to get annoyed.
7. Long Format: Use detailed text, photos, and videos.
8. Easy to Unsubscribe: Customers can easily opt out.
9. Easy Tracking: Track delivery, open rates, and clicks.
10. Professional: Seen as more professional; customers read carefully.
Slide 6
Disadvantages Of Email Marketing:
1. Irrelevant Emails: Costs can rise with irrelevant emails.
2. Poor Content: Boring emails can lead to disengagement.
3. Easy Unsubscribe: Customers can easily leave your list.
Slide 7
Email Marketing Tools
Choosing a good tool involves considering:
1. Deliverability: Email delivery rate.
2. Inbox Placement: Reaching inbox, not spam or promotions.
3. Ease of Use: Simplicity of use.
4. Cost: Affordability.
5. List Maintenance: Keeping the list clean.
6. Features: Regular features like Broadcast and Sequence.
7. Automation: Better with automation.
Slide 8
Top 5 Email Marketing Tools:
1. ConvertKit
2. Get Response
3. Mailchimp
4. Active Campaign
5. Aweber
Slide 9
Email Marketing Strategy
To get good results, consider:
1. Build your own list.
2. Never buy leads.
3. Respect your customers.
4. Always provide value.
5. Don’t email just to sell.
6. Write heartfelt emails.
7. Stick to a schedule.
8. Use photos and videos.
9. Segment your list.
10. Personalize emails.
11. Ensure mobile-friendliness.
12. Optimize timing.
13. Keep designs clean.
14. Remove cold leads.
Slide 10
Uses of Email Marketing:
1. Affiliate Marketing
2. Blogging
3. Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
4. Newsletter Circulation
5. Transaction Notifications
6. Information Dissemination
7. Gathering Feedback
8. Selling Courses
9. Selling Products/Services
Read Full Article:
https://digitalsamaaj.com/is-email-marketing-effective-in-2024/
How to Create Sequence Numbers in Odoo 17Celine George
Sequence numbers are mainly used to identify or differentiate each record in a module. Sequences are customizable and can be configured in a specific pattern such as suffix, prefix or a particular numbering scheme. This slide will show how to create sequence numbers in odoo 17.
But Were We Successful: Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate Library Services
1. But Were We Successful?
Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate
Library Services
Rebekah Cummings
rebekah.cummings@utah.edu
Lindsay Ozburn
lindsay.ozburn@usu.edu
Andrea Payant
andrea.payant@usu.edu
Mike Shelton
michael.shelton@usu.edu
Ryan Bushman
ryan.bushman@usu.edu
Utah Library Association Conference - May 20, 2021
2. Why Was RDMS Created?
Why did Utah State University create a research data management services
program?
RDMS was created to comply with federal mandates stemming from the
2013 OSTP Memo on “Increasing Access to the Results of Federally
Funded Scientific Research.”
3. 2013 OSTP Memo
In 2013 the Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a memorandum
titled:
“Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research”
• “The Administration is committed to ensuring that, to the greatest extent
and with the fewest constraints possible and consistent with law and the
objectives set out below, the direct results of federally funded scientific
research are made available to and useful for the public, industry, and the
scientific community. Such results include peer-reviewed publications and
digital data.”
• Stipulated that federal agencies with over $100M in R&D had to develop
plans to make publications and data that originated from federally funded
research freely available to the public.
4. What This Meant for Researchers:
● The need to maintain and make their data publicly
accessible, generally through data repositories.
● The need for their publications to be open access
and to generally have them listed in the funder’s
public access repository.
● The need to include information about any data
and publications created with their annual reports
to their funders.
● The inclusion of a data management plan with the
award applications.
5. Utah State University recognized several needs necessary to help Primary Investigators (PI)
maintain compliance with funder mandates:
USU’s Response to the OSTP Memo:
• The need to create a Data Librarian position to assist researchers with their publications and data: Fulfilled in
Summer 2015.
• Bring campus stakeholders together to access needs and create a compliance program: In Autumn 2015 a cross-
campus group with members from the Office of Research and Graduate Studies (RGS), the Office of Information
Technology (IT), and the Merrill-Cazier Library started meeting to access how to best monitor and assist USU
researchers’ compliance.
• The needs to create and implement a University Research Data Policy and a process to create auditable records to
facilitate access to data and publications: By Autumn 2016 a plan was implemented that included the process for
award compliance tracking
6. USU’s Approach to Compliance:
USU decided to take an approach that facilitates the researchers’ ability to be in
Funder Compliance
USU worked to develop a compliance process that would:
• Demonstrate to Funders that the University is making good faith effort to comply with mandates.
• Emphasis to researchers that complying with funder mandates is an institutional priority.
• Demonstrate to researchers that resources are available to support them in meeting funder mandates to
make data openly accessible.
8. Continued Support for RDMS from Administration
Both the Library and University administration recognizes that compliance to funder
mandates is an institutional priority. They continue to support RDMS in a variety of
ways:
• Monthly meetings of the University’s Research Data Management Committee, which is made up members from the Library
and the Office of Research. These meeting serve to discuss the needs of both RDMS and the researchers, news in the data
management field, and to develop instructional opportunities with the campus community.
• Once a semester the Library (via RDMS’s supervising Associate Dean) sponsors Data Club, a working lunch where PIs are
invited to visit with the RDMS staff and a representative from the Research Office to discuss their data concerns.
�� In February 2020, the Library and Research office co-sponsored RDMS in conducting a half-day workshop called
“Datapalooza” geared toward teaching graduate students good data management practices. This was followed up in April
2021 with a second Zoom based Datapalooza event.
9. Establishing the Need for Program Assessment
•Association of American Universities (AAU) and the Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities
(APLU) working group conference
•Two members of RDMS, as well as the Interim Vice President of Research represented USU.
•Outcome: recognizing the need to assess the quality and effectiveness of the University’s
compliance program via RDMS’s efforts.
10. Assessing the compliance of federal mandates:
the library’s involvement
Early 2010’s…
• Federal organizations started requiring Data Management Plans to ensure research reproducibility
• Research reproducibility becomes a hot topic in LIS, with libraries examining what role they might play in
assisting their campus’ researchers with the reproducibility and accessibility of empirical research (Vitale,
2016)
o This led to a shift in academia = libraries become increasingly more engaged in campus research efforts and support.
• Emergence of RDMS programs and technical infrastructure as a support mechanism
11. Assessing the compliance of federal mandates:
the library’s involvement
Late 2010’s…
• Librarians and professional library orgs are more involved than ever in shaping policy and best practices for
RDMS in support of researchers
o Sparsely explored topic in LIS literature
• This research addresses the gap in literature and assessment of RDMS efforts
12. Our Assessment Methods
• Traditional survey coupled with an online asynchronous focus group (OAFG)
• Why two methods? Data triangulation
o Survey gave us a broad look at what works and what could be improved. OAFG dug
deeper into these questions to give us specifics for improvement
• OAFG discussion questions modeled after survey questions and results
13. Asynchronous Focus Groups as a Methodology: What are they?
• Focus groups conducted through online mediums where participants do not need
to be in the same place or online at the same time.
o Typically, they are given a time frame (2 day, for example) in which to participate
• Who uses them?
o Marketing- generating consumer insights that inform response to advertising
o Health - discussing healthcare issues with professionals across the globe (Han et al.,
2019; Ramo et al., 2019)
14. Pros and Cons of Asynchronous Focus Groups
Pros:
● Not bound in time and space as much; as
people can assemble to participate in
whatever time frame you give them
● Often, they have the potential to be
anonymous, which is helpful for sensitive
topics
● A lack of geographic boundaries helps increase
the diversity of a participant pool for specific
types of research projects
● In academia, busy faculty schedules are less of
a barrier for participation
Cons:
• Still dealing with the influence of social cues in
focus groups but in a much more presumptive
way (i.e., lack of vocal tone and eye contact can
lead to assumptions about someone’s answer).
• Previous forum posts can influence future posts
Why? While this is the case when speaking,
participants get more time to craft their answers
in online forums, leading to a higher potential
for influencing factors
• Ethical considerations of cyberspace: anonymity
could lead to people misrepresenting who they
are and/or sharing other participant’s responses
with others.
15. How did we use OAFG to assess our program?
• We used Canvas, an online learning platform that both USU and U of U had access
to.
• Of the team, we used the librarian at U of U as an outside moderator to encourage
honesty and to scrub data of identifiable information.
o Outside moderators are important with focus groups, in general, to prevent
unintentional biases in questions and to encourage honest answers from participants.
16. Hold Up.
You were assessing participants at one location
Why did you use an OAFG?
17. Pros and Cons of Asynchronous Focus Groups
Pros:
● Not bound in time and space as much; as
people can assemble to participate in
whatever time frame you give them
● Often, they have the potential to be
anonymous, which is helpful for sensitive
topics
● A lack of geographic boundaries helps increase
the diversity of a participant pool for specific
types of research projects
● In academia, busy faculty schedules are less of
a barrier for participation
Cons:
• Still dealing with the influence of social cues in
focus groups but in a much more presumptive
way (i.e., lack of vocal tone and eye contact can
lead to assumptions about someone’s answer).
• Previous forum posts can influence future posts
Why? While this is the case when speaking,
participants get more time to craft their answers
in online forums, leading to a higher potential
for influencing factors
• Ethical considerations of cyberspace: anonymity
could lead to people misrepresenting who they
are and/or sharing other participant’s responses
with others.
18. Qualities of Survey
• Population: 78 Researchers
• Sample: 28 Researchers
o Initial response of 32 researchers ( 41.03% of the population)
o Data cleaning determined 28 of respondents provided usable data (34.6% of population)
• Introduction of Bias
o We opted for a convenience sample rather than a randomized sample
19. The Survey
Two styles of question:
• Questions designed to determine the frequency of a behavior of the researcher often used the following
scale
o Never
o 0-3 times (a redundancy we would like to fix in further research projects)
o 4-7 times
o 8-10 times
o More than 10 times
• Questions designed to determines a researcher's response to USU’s efforts used the following scale
o Strongly Disagree
o Somewhat Disagree
o Neither Agree Nor Disagree
o Somewhat Agree
o Strongly Agree
20. Key Statistics
• 19 of the 27 (70.4%) respondents indicated they had three or fewer awards that
required deposit of publications into a public access repository
• 18 of the 27 (66.67%) respondents indicated they had three or fewer awards that
required deposit of data into a publicly accessible repository.
• “Could Sponsored Programs or the Library better facilitate efforts to meet agency
mandates?”
o 13 of 27 (48.15%) responded yes
o 14 (51.85%) responded no.
o When examined by years as a researcher, a higher percentage of respondents in the range of 11-20
years as a researcher responded “yes” to this question.
21. Key Statistics: Behavior of the Researcher
• Motive for making data publicly available
o 84.6% to comply with journal publishing requirements
o 92.6% to satisfy a funder
o 61.5% with the desire for their data to be public
• 92.59% of respondents indicated that they anticipated writing journal publications
up to 5 years after the close of their award
• 88.46% of respondents anticipated needing up to 4 years after the close of their
award to have final data ready for deposit in a public repository
22. Key Statistics: Response to USU’s Efforts
• The email from SPO was helpful
o 20 (74.07%) strongly agree
o 5 (18.52%) somewhat agree
• Researchers understand how to respond to the email
from SPO
o 13 (48.15%) strongly agree
o 7 (25.93%) somewhat agree
o 5 (18.52%) somewhat disagree
• The email from SPO explains how they could find more
help
o 16 (59.26%) strongly agree
o 8 (29.63%) somewhat agree
o 2 (7.41%) somewhat disagree
• The email from DL was helpful
o 11 (64.71%) strongly agree
o 5 (29.41 % somewhat agree
o 1 (5.88%) somewhat disagrees
• Researchers understand how to respond to email from
DL
o 11 (64.71%) strongly agree
o 4 (23.53%) somewhat agree
o 2 (11.76%) neither agree nor disagree
• The email from DL explains how they could find more
help
o 11 (64.71%) strongly agree
o 5 (29.41%) somewhat agree
o 1 (5.88%) somewhat disagree
24. • SECURE
• FAMILIAR
• ALLOWED FOR DISCUSSION
• RESPOND IN LINE
• TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Technology
25. Five Discussions
Introductions Response to funder
mandates
Researcher data
practices &
publication deposit
Research
Office and Library
program
What would help?
26. First Attempt
• Selected 15 participants at random
• VP for Research invited the fifteen participants
to join the OAFG at their convenience the
following day
• With only a single day’s notice, only two of the
fifteen participants responded, and they,
inexplicably, couldn’t get into the Canvas site.
27. Second Attempt
• Moved Canvas site from University of Utah to USU
• Gave participants several weeks of advance notice
• Confirmed attendance with five participants, but only three
showed up
• Good news! The three participants gave excellent, detailed
feedback, interacted with one another, and didn’t have any
technical issues
28. Qualitative Data Analysis
1. Praise for the Data Librarian, the library, and the research office (16
statements)
2. Data sharing challenges (6 statements)
3. Data resources (such as DMP Tool, FigShare, Digital Commons,
Metavist,Morpho) (10 statements)
4. Appropriate time to make data available (6 statements)
5. Open Access (7 statements)
6. Actionable steps USU can do to help researchers (6 statements)
29. Findings – Participants don’t love data sharing
“Honestly, when I first heard that Federal agencies required
researchers to make all the raw data available to the public I
thought: “Really? This is useless and opens the door for a lot of
plagiarism.” I still feel that way a little bit. It’s one thing to have open
access journals where everybody has the chance to download the
paper, but making data available (even after the paper has been
published) is a little bit too risky… I don’t make any data available
until after the paper has been published.”
30. Findings – Participants appreciate current services
“What helps me? Betty!!! She is great! As
[another participant] mentioned, when I have
to upload anything, Betty is my first point of
contact. I know that I get excellent information
from her.”
31. Findings – What could help?
• Meet with the Data Librarian after receiving an award
• Checking to see what publications can be uploaded and updating PI records
accordingly
• Depositing data and publications on behalf of researchers
• Custom support for any agency requirements
• Sending reminders beyond the close of the award, until the PI notified the Data
Librarian that all data and publications related to the award have been deposited
• Help paying open access fees.
32. Summary
• Pioneering the USU compliance tracking program
• Identifying the need for a program assessment
o Goals
Understanding researcher behavior
Evaluating response to USU’s compliance tracking program
o Methods
Survey
OAFG
• Qualitative data analysis and findings
33. Lessons Learned
• Survey
o Data representative of a portion of researchers
Convenience vs. Randomized – taking a randomized sample makes the data more representative of
the population
o Work with someone that has statistical expertise
• OAFG
o Timing and buy in
o Platform needs
34. How our results will shape future services
• Clarification or requirements expected by individual funders
o Continue updating to data management services website
o Continue to tailor reminder emails to include links to resources for each PI’s agency information about
requirements
o The library is currently changing the workflow to include additional help post close-out of awards
o Improved communication from the USU Libraries and Sponsored Programs
• Further investigation and research
o Improving interaction with researchers less inclined to think Sponsored Programs/USU Libraries can help
them meet agency requirements to deposit publications and data
35. Future of the Project
• Developing a culture of responsible data stewardship
o Understanding research hesitancy to share data
o Further sessions
When data should be released
Data citation
Data licensing
Effective methods for describing research data
36. Read our article:
Rebekah Cummings, Lindsay Ozburn, Andrea Payant, Betty Rozum, Michael Shelton & Ryan Bushman
(2020) Assessing Research Compliance for Federally Funded Projects: The Good, the Bad, and the
Publicly Accessible, Journal of Library Administration, 60:7, 726-751, DOI:
10.1080/01930826.2020.1786985
Learn More
37. Thanks!
Do you have any questions?
Rebekah Cummings
rebekah.cummings@utah.edu
Lindsay Ozburn
lindsay.ozburn@usu.edu
Andrea Payant
andrea.payant@usu.edu
Mike Shelton
michael.shelton@usu.edu
Ryan Bushman
ryan.bushman@usu.edu