This document discusses static and dynamic testing techniques. It defines static testing as examining software work products manually or with tools without executing them, while dynamic testing executes software using input values to examine outputs. The document then describes the phases of a formal review process and defines roles in a review. It identifies the moderator, author, scribe, reviewers, and manager. Finally, it explains the differences between inspections, technical reviews, and walkthroughs, providing details on each type of review.
The document outlines elements of a development plan and quality assurance plan for a software project. The development plan covers deliverables, interfaces, methodology, standards, milestones, organization, facilities, risks, and costs. The quality assurance plan defines quality goals, review activities, tests, and configuration management. It also discusses classes of development risks like scheduling and requirements, and provides examples of top risks. Finally, it describes a risk management process and potential actions to prevent and resolve risks through prevention, identification, and resolution. The overall objectives are to plan adequately for successful and timely project completion through scheduling, resource allocation, risk resolution, quality activities, and management control.
This document discusses software inspections as a way to improve quality. It describes the benefits of inspections in finding defects early. Inspections typically involve a moderator, author, reader, recorder and inspectors reviewing requirements, design or code documents. Key aspects of inspections include planning, overview, preparation, meeting, analysis and rework. Guiding principles are to critique products not people and find problems, not fix them, during reviews. Record keeping of found defects is important for process improvement. Providing training and building inspections into schedules can help make them most effective.
Static techniques http://sif.uin-suska.ac.id/ http://fst.uin-suska.ac.id/ http://www.uin-suska.ac.id/
This document discusses the key components of software quality assurance (SQA). It outlines pre-project quality components like contract reviews and quality plans. It also describes project life cycle components such as reviews, testing, maintenance and quality assurance. Additionally, it discusses infrastructure components for error prevention like procedures, training and configuration management. The goal is to organize SQA efforts and ensure quality throughout the software development life cycle.
The document outlines the software testing life cycle (STLC) which is a systematic and planned process for testing software. The STLC includes requirement analysis to define what will be tested, test planning to identify activities, resources and schedules, test case development to detail test cases and data, test execution to run test cases and log results, and test cycle closure to generate reports and complete testing.
The document discusses the various components of software quality assurance (SQA) systems that can be classified into six main classes: pre-project quality components, project life cycle components, infrastructure error preventive and improvement components, software quality management components, standardization, certification and SQA assessment components, and organizing for SQA – the human components. It provides details on various SQA activities like reviews, expert opinions, software testing, software maintenance, and ensuring quality of subcontractors' work. It also discusses documentation control and configuration management as important SQA components.
The document discusses static testing techniques, specifically reviews. It describes the review process, which typically involves 6 phases: planning, kick-off, preparation, review meeting, rework, and follow-up. Key roles in a review include the moderator, author, scribe, and reviewers. The moderator leads the process, while the author's goal is to improve the document. Reviews can find defects early and improve quality and productivity.
Static techniques such as reviews can improve both quality and productivity in software development. Static testing examines software work products like requirements and design documents manually or with tools before execution, finding defects early. Dynamic testing executes software with test cases. The two techniques are complementary, as static testing finds defects like missing requirements or design flaws while dynamic testing finds failures from execution. Using static testing from early in the development lifecycle provides advantages like early feedback, low rework costs, increased productivity, and greater awareness of quality issues.
Static testing involves inspecting work products like requirements, design documents, and code without executing the code. It aims to find defects early when rework costs are lower. The document discusses static testing techniques like unit testing, integration testing, and reviews. Reviews include inspections - moderated meetings where defects are discussed - and technical and informal reviews with subject matter experts. The goal is early defect detection to improve quality and productivity.