Skip to main content

Questions tagged [axiom-of-choice]

An important and fundamental axiom in set theory sometimes called Zermelo's axiom of choice. It was formulated by Zermelo in 1904 and states that, given any set of mutually disjoint nonempty sets, there exists at least one set that contains exactly one element in common with each of the nonempty sets. The axiom of choice is related to the first of Hilbert's problems.

8 votes
1 answer
240 views

Non-Ramsey functions $c:[\omega]^\omega\to\{0,1\}$ and the Axiom of Choice

Let $[\omega]^\omega$ denote the collection of infinite subsets of $\omega$, and let $c:[\omega]^\omega\to\{0,1\}$ be a function. We say that $a\in [\omega]^\omega$ is monochromatic with respect to $c$...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
603 views

Involutions in the absolute Galois group (and the Axiom of Choice)

It is known that the only elementary abelian $2$-groups (finite and nonfinite) in $\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$ are in fact finite and cyclic – that is to say, they are of order $2$....
THC's user avatar
  • 4,503
4 votes
0 answers
221 views

stating large cardinal axioms in ZF

Can I ask whether there is a good reference for how to state the standard large cardinal axioms in the context of $ZF$? My concern is that it seems that the usual proof that embeddings defined from ...
Rupert's user avatar
  • 2,055
1 vote
0 answers
732 views

Finding a unique and finite expected value for almost all measurable functions?

Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. If set $A\subseteq X$, let $H^{\alpha}$ be the $\alpha$-dimensional Hausdorff measure on $A$, where $\alpha\in[0,+\infty)$ and $\text{dim}_{\text{H}}(A)$ is the ...
Arbuja's user avatar
  • 1
9 votes
1 answer
622 views

Small Violations of Choice: Can we force AC without collapsing the cardinalities of ordinals?

We say that a model $M$ of $\mathsf{ZF}$ satisfies Small Violations of Choice ($\mathsf{SVC}$) if all (any) of the following apply: There is a model $V\subseteq M$ such that $V\vDash\mathsf{ZFC}$, ...
Calliope Ryan-Smith's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
715 views

Class-theoretic division paradox

The Division Paradox is the fact that there are models of ${\sf ZF \neg C}$ in which a set can be partitioned into a set that is bigger than it — equivalently, in which there are sets $X$ and $Y$ such ...
user171348's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
199 views

Basic cardinal arithmetic without choice

Do we know everything about addition and multiplication of cardinalities in choiceless set theory? For example, let $M$ be a model of $\textsf{ZF}+\textsf{AD}+V=L(\mathbb{R})$, consider the sets $\...
new account's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Stone-Weierstrass Theorem without AC

To what extent does the usual Stone-Weierstrass Theorem depend on some form of the Axiom of Choice? There seems to be a lot of literature on constructive versions in toposes, but I have been unable ...
Bruce Blackadar's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
114 views

Elementary abelian 2-subgroups of $\mathrm{Aut}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$ (with and without choice)

Consider the absolute Galois group $G_{\mathbb{Q}} := \mathrm{Aut}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$. As I understand it, the only torsion elements have order $2$ (by Artin-Schreier), and they are ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,503
7 votes
0 answers
310 views

What is the strongest form of the Axiom of Choice available in $\mathsf{Z}_{2}$?

$\mathsf{Z}_{2}$ denotes second-order arithmetic. Some forms of AC are expressible in $\mathsf{Z}_{2}$; for example the $\mathsf{\Sigma}_{1}^{1}$ axiom of choice is part of the theory $\mathsf{ATR}_{0}...
Victor's user avatar
  • 2,106
5 votes
1 answer
515 views

Large cardinals in ZF + DC + AD

The Axiom of Dependent Choice (DC) is often considered to be an "intuitive and non-controversial" version of choice used in the proofs of many theorems in Analysis. Similarly, the Axiom of ...
Anindya's user avatar
  • 381
6 votes
1 answer
486 views

Automorphisms of algebraically closed fields without the Axiom of Choice

In the paper Algebraische Konsequenzen des Determiniertheits-Axioms (U. Felgner – K. Schulz, Arch. Math. (Basel) 42 (1984), pp. 557–563), the authors show that in models of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,503
6 votes
0 answers
161 views

Weak trichotomy principle in the absence of choice

It is well known that the trichotomy property of cardinals ($∀κ,λ\in\operatorname{Card}(κ<λ∨κ=λ∨κ>λ)$) is equivalent to the axiom of choice. D. Feldman and M. Orhon had defined in [1] a ...
Holo's user avatar
  • 1,654
-2 votes
1 answer
199 views

Does cardinal definable choice imply AC?

Recall the definition of cardinal definable sets, to re-iterate: $Define: X \text { is cardinal definable} \iff \\\exists \text { cardinal } \kappa \, \exists \text { cardinals } \lambda_1,.., \...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
202 views

Exactly how much (and how little) can partial ordered sets (classes) embed to the cardinalities

In the paper "Convex Sets of Cardinals", Truss mentioned a result of Jech: If $M$ is a countable transitive model of ZFC, and $(P,<)∈M$ is a poset, then there exists a Cohen extension of ...
Holo's user avatar
  • 1,654

15 30 50 per page
1
3 4
5
6 7
39