Skip to main content

All Questions

14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Proof/Reference to a claim about AC and definable real numbers

I’ve read somewhere on this site (I believe from a JDH comment) that an argument in favor of AC (I believe from Asaf Karagila) is that without AC, there exists a real number which is not definable ...
Lave Cave's user avatar
  • 243
7 votes
1 answer
400 views

How much choice is needed to prove the completeness of equational logic?

All the proofs of the completeness of (Birkhoff's) equational logic I have read seem to pick representatives for equivalence classes of terms and hence require the axiom of choice. Is AC (or a weak ...
ralphS16's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
188 views

Reference request: choiceless cardinality quantifiers

There is a substantial literature on the logic of cardinality quantifiers. (E.g., the quantifier $Q_\alpha$ where $M \vDash Q_\alpha x \, \varphi (x)$ iff $\vert \{a \in M : M \vDash \varphi[a] \} \...
Beau Madison Mount's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
132 views

References for the axiom of surjective comparability

The axiom $W_\kappa$, for $\kappa$ a cardinal, is the statement that for all sets $X$, either $|X|\leq\kappa$ (that is, there is an injection $X\to\kappa$) or $\kappa\leq|X|$. Is there literature on ...
Calliope Ryan-Smith's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
221 views

stating large cardinal axioms in ZF

Can I ask whether there is a good reference for how to state the standard large cardinal axioms in the context of $ZF$? My concern is that it seems that the usual proof that embeddings defined from ...
Rupert's user avatar
  • 2,055
4 votes
1 answer
202 views

Exactly how much (and how little) can partial ordered sets (classes) embed to the cardinalities

In the paper "Convex Sets of Cardinals", Truss mentioned a result of Jech: If $M$ is a countable transitive model of ZFC, and $(P,<)∈M$ is a poset, then there exists a Cohen extension of ...
Holo's user avatar
  • 1,654
12 votes
1 answer
434 views

Is there a more modern account of the main results of "Adding Dependent Choice" by D. Pincus?

I would like to read Pincus' article Adding dependent choice, where he proves, among other things, the consistency of the theory $\mathsf{ZF+DC+O+\neg AC}$, where $\mathsf{DC}$ stands for Dependent ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
13 votes
0 answers
321 views

$\mathsf{AC}_\mathsf{WO}+\mathsf{AC}^\mathsf{WO}\Rightarrow \mathsf{AC}$?

Let $\mathsf{AC}_\mathsf{WO}$: Every well-orderable family of non-empty sets has a choice function. $\mathsf{AC}^\mathsf{WO}$: Every family of non-empty well-orderable sets has a choice function. My ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
14 votes
4 answers
2k views

What can be preserved in mathematics if all constructions are carried out in ZF?

This is inspired by this discussion. I see that the debates about the necessity of the axiom of choice in this or that statement are still ongoing. In this regard, I became interested in whether there ...
Sergei Akbarov's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
141 views

Consistency of a strange (choice-wise) set of reals, pt. 2

This is a follow-up on this question. Consider a set $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $X$ is not separable wrt its subspace topology Every countable family of non-empty pairwise disjoint subsets of $...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
7 votes
2 answers
714 views

Consistency of a strange (choice-wise) set of reals

Consider a set $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $X$ is not separable wrt its subspace topology For all $r\in\mathbb{R}$ there exists a sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\omega} \subset X$ converging to $r$ In a ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
5 votes
0 answers
279 views

Reference for countable and uncountable algebraic closures of $\mathbb{Q}$ in ZF

The following facts seem to be part of the folklore (where $\mathsf{ZF}$ means Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with no axiom of choice): it is consistent with $\mathsf{ZF}$ that there exists an ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 30.8k
5 votes
1 answer
292 views

A question about the axiom of dependent choice

Let $\mathrm{NBG}^-$ be $\mathrm{NBG}$ minus the Axiom of Choice for Classes (including sets)). Further let $\mathrm{DC}$ be the Axiom of Dependent Choice for sets and $\mathrm{DC}^\omega$ be Bernays ...
Philip Ehrlich's user avatar
10 votes
3 answers
551 views

Terminology for a set that does not surject onto $\omega$ (in ZF)

Short question: Is there a standard term for a set $F$ such that there does not exist a surjection $F \twoheadrightarrow \omega$ (in the context of ZF)? More detailed version: Consider the following ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 30.8k
3 votes
1 answer
166 views

A simple form of choice

While reviewing some categorical versions of the axiom of choice, it occurred to me that none of the formulations I'm aware of actually reflect how I use choice in practice: pronounce that we 'choose ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,097

15 30 50 per page