Skip to main content

All Questions

14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Proof/Reference to a claim about AC and definable real numbers

I’ve read somewhere on this site (I believe from a JDH comment) that an argument in favor of AC (I believe from Asaf Karagila) is that without AC, there exists a real number which is not definable ...
Lave Cave's user avatar
  • 243
10 votes
1 answer
613 views

Infinitary logics and the axiom of choice

Suppose we want to enhance ZF by allowing for infinitary formulas instead of just first-order ones in our axiom schema of separation and/or replacement. It seems that we don't need much power in our ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
162 views

Is discriminative choice provable in ZFC?

Let $\phi$ be a formula defining an equivalence relation. Definitions: The $\phi$-cardinality of a set $X$ be the cardinality of $X/\phi$. That is, the cardinality of the set of all equivalence ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
488 views

Must strange sequences wear Russellian socks?

This is an attempt to make more precise a vague guess at the end of this answer of mine. We work in $\mathsf{ZF}$ throughout. Say that a sequence $\mathcal{A}=(A_i)_{i\in\omega}$ of disjoint sets is ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
458 views

Does Well-Ordered Interval Power Set "WOIPS" principle , prove $\sf AC$ in $\sf ZFA$?

Does $\sf ZFA + WOIPS$ prove $\sf AC$? Where $\sf WOIPS$ is phrased as: for every infinite set $X$ the set of intervening cardinals between $|X|$ and $|\mathcal P(X)|$ is well-ordered. In $\sf ZF$, I ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
149 views

The equivalence of Dedekind-infinite and dually Dedekind-infinite as a weak form of (AC)

A set $X$ is Dedekind-infinite if there is an injective map $f: X\to X$ that is not surjective. A set $X$ is dually Dedekind-infinite if there is a surjective map $f: X\to X$ that is not injective. In ...
Dominic van der Zypen's user avatar
26 votes
1 answer
897 views

A cardinal inequality for finiteness

Nearly ten years ago, I explained in a blog post that, assuming only ZF, a cardinal number $\mathfrak{n}$ is finite if and only if it satisfies this monstrous inequality: $$2^{2^{2^{2^{\mathfrak{n}}}}}...
François G. Dorais's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
298 views

Proof of the axiom of choice for finite sets in ZF [closed]

Let the set $A$ be finite and $\emptyset \notin A$. How can I, without using the axiom of choice, prove by mathematical induction that there exists a function $f : A \rightarrow \bigcup A$ satisfying $...
Maria S.'s user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
161 views

Periodicity in the cumulative hierarchy

Under Reinhardt cardinals in ZF, the cumulative hierarchy exhibits a periodicity in that for large enough $λ$, certain properties of $V_λ$ depend on whether $λ$ is even vs odd. See Periodicity in the ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
180 views

Large cardinals beyond choice and HOD(Ord^ω)

Are Reinhardt and Berkeley cardinals (and even a stationary class of club Berkeley cardinals) consistent with $V=\mathrm{HOD}(\mathrm{Ord}^ω)$ ? It seems natural to expect no, but I do not see a proof....
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
144 views

Consistency of definability beyond P(Ord) in ZF

Is it consistent with ZF that the satisfaction relation of $L(P(Ord))$ is $Δ^V_2$ definable? More generally, is it consistent with ZF that there is a $Δ^V_2$ formula (taking $α$ as a parameter) that ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
270 views

Would strengthening Foundation and Choice in NBG, make it equi-consistent with MK?

This is a follow up to an earlier question about strengthening of foundation in relation to proving the consistency of ZFC. It was shown that it would achieve that, but it may fail short of MK. Here, ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
230 views

Long chains of Dedekind finite sets

This is a variation on this question with amorphous cardinals replaced with dedekind finite sets. Dedekind finite sets are sets that have no countable subset, and it is well known that this is a ...
Ynir Paz's user avatar
  • 384
13 votes
1 answer
549 views

Long chains of amorphous cardinalities

An amorphous set is an infinite set that cannot be partitioned into 2 infinite subsets. An amorphous cardinality is the cardinality of an amorphous set. Working in $\sf ZF$, it is consistent that ...
Ynir Paz's user avatar
  • 384
12 votes
1 answer
506 views

Building the real from Dedekind finite sets

It is well known that the real numbers can be countable union of countable sets by starting with GCH and taking a finite support permutations while collapsing all of $\aleph_n$ for natural $n$. The ...
Holo's user avatar
  • 1,654

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
19