Skip to main content

All Questions

4 votes
0 answers
144 views

Consistency of definability beyond P(Ord) in ZF

Is it consistent with ZF that the satisfaction relation of $L(P(Ord))$ is $Δ^V_2$ definable? More generally, is it consistent with ZF that there is a $Δ^V_2$ formula (taking $α$ as a parameter) that ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
207 views

Does $\mathsf{ZF}$ prove $\operatorname{Col}(\lambda,\kappa)$ preserves cardinals below $\lambda$?

Let $\lambda<\kappa$ be cardinals and consider the forcing $\operatorname{Col}(\lambda,\kappa)$ adding a generic surjection $\lambda\to\kappa$. More formally, $\operatorname{Col}(\lambda,\kappa)$ ...
Hanul Jeon's user avatar
  • 2,910
9 votes
1 answer
622 views

Small Violations of Choice: Can we force AC without collapsing the cardinalities of ordinals?

We say that a model $M$ of $\mathsf{ZF}$ satisfies Small Violations of Choice ($\mathsf{SVC}$) if all (any) of the following apply: There is a model $V\subseteq M$ such that $V\vDash\mathsf{ZFC}$, ...
Calliope Ryan-Smith's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
434 views

Is there a more modern account of the main results of "Adding Dependent Choice" by D. Pincus?

I would like to read Pincus' article Adding dependent choice, where he proves, among other things, the consistency of the theory $\mathsf{ZF+DC+O+\neg AC}$, where $\mathsf{DC}$ stands for Dependent ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
7 votes
1 answer
369 views

How hard is it to get "absolutely" no amorphous sets?

A beautiful and surprising (to me at least) result around the axiom of choice is that, while full $\mathsf{AC}$ is preserved by forcing, a model of $\mathsf{ZF}$ + "There are no amorphous sets&...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
137 views

$2^{|V|}$ class cardinalities without global choice

Is it consistent with Morse-Kelley set theory without global choice (but with choice for sets) that there are $2^{|V|}$ proper classes of different cardinalities? Alternative question: Is it ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
141 views

Consistency of a strange (choice-wise) set of reals, pt. 2

This is a follow-up on this question. Consider a set $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $X$ is not separable wrt its subspace topology Every countable family of non-empty pairwise disjoint subsets of $...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
7 votes
2 answers
714 views

Consistency of a strange (choice-wise) set of reals

Consider a set $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $X$ is not separable wrt its subspace topology For all $r\in\mathbb{R}$ there exists a sequence $(x_n)_{n\in\omega} \subset X$ converging to $r$ In a ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,236
7 votes
2 answers
673 views

Can second-order logic identify "amorphous satisfiability"?

Recall that a set is amorphous iff it is infinite but has no partition into two infinite subsets. I'm interested in the possible structure (in the sense of model theory) which an amorphous set can ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
288 views

Does ZF + BPI alone prove the equivalence between "Baire theorem for compact Hausdorff spaces" and "Rasiowa-Sikorski Lemma for Forcing Posets"?

Rasiowa-Sikorski Lemma (for forcing posets)is the statement: For any p.o. $\mathbb{P}$ (i.e. $\mathbb{P}$ is a reflexive transitive relation) and for any countable family of dense subsets of $\mathbb{...
Samuel G. Silva's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
144 views

Maximality principle in symmetric extensions

Let $M$ be a ctm and $P\in M$ a forcing order. In regular forcing extensions, we have the following well-known Principle: $$p\Vdash_{M,P}\exists x\phi[x]\;\Longrightarrow\;\exists\sigma\in M^P\;p\...
Hannes Jakob's user avatar
  • 1,632
10 votes
1 answer
517 views

Models of ZF intermediate between a model of ZFC and a generic extension

Let $M$ be a countable model of $ZFC$ and $M[G]$ be a (set) generic extension of $M$. Suppose $N$ is a countable model of $ZF$ with $$M\subseteq N \subseteq M[G]$$ and that $N=M(x)$ for some $x\in ...
Toby Meadows's user avatar
  • 1,132
18 votes
2 answers
817 views

Do choice principles in all generic extensions imply AC in $V$?

It's well-known that not all choice principles are preserved under forcing, e.g. in this answer https://mathoverflow.net/a/77002/109573 Asaf shows the ordering principle can hold in $V$ and fail in a ...
Elliot Glazer's user avatar
10 votes
4 answers
551 views

What are some kinds of models where DC holds?

There are a lot of ways to build a model where DC fails. However, all of them that I'm aware of involve adding at least a messy set of reals (or rather, taking a forcing extension and then passing to ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
156 views

Invariant names and submodels of forcing extensions

EDIT: There are serious problems with the definition below; see the comment thread below for those problems and some thoughts on addressing them. I'm leaving the question up for now since I think the ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar

15 30 50 per page