Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
1 answer
226 views

Is Morse-Kelley set theory with Class Choice bi-interpretable with itself after removing Extensionality for classes?

Let $\sf MKCC$ stand for Morse-Kelley set theory with Class Choice. And let this theory be precisely $\sf MK$ with a binary primitive symbol $\prec$ added to its language, and the following axioms ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
165 views

"Minimal-ish" Dedekind-finite cardinalities of models

Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZF}+$ "There is an infinite Dedekind-finite set." Say that a Dedekind-finite cardinality $\kappa$ is $\Sigma^1_1$-isolated iff there is some first-order ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
75 views

Is "strongly unbounded logics are unbounded" equivalent to "no descending sequence of cardinals"?

This question is motivated by Vaananen's paper Generalized quantifiers in models of set theory. Say that a (set-sized, regular) logic $\mathcal{L}$ is unbounded if there are $\mathcal{L}$-sentences $\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
438 views

Automorphisms of projective spaces, and the Axiom of Choice

It is known that upon not accepting the Axiom of Choice (AC), there exist models of ZF in which there are projective spaces (over a division ring) with a trivial automorphism group. (This is a truly ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,503
7 votes
1 answer
369 views

How hard is it to get "absolutely" no amorphous sets?

A beautiful and surprising (to me at least) result around the axiom of choice is that, while full $\mathsf{AC}$ is preserved by forcing, a model of $\mathsf{ZF}$ + "There are no amorphous sets&...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
307 views

Is there a "nice" inner model for $\mathsf{ZF}$ + a Dedekind-finite infinite set of reals?

Below, given a formula $\varphi$ which $\mathsf{ZF}$ proves defines a set of reals and an inner model $W$, I'll write "$\varphi^W$" and "$L(\varphi^W)$" for "$\{x:W\models\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
283 views

Is this "finite-ish combinatorics" reflection principle consistent?

This question is an attempt to chisel away at this earlier question of mine, which in retrospect may be rather intractable. Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZF}$. Briefly (see the linked question for ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
350 views

How much "finitary combinatorics" can be emulated by an infinite Dedekind-finite set?

Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZF}$. Let $[n]=\{1,...,n\}$. Given a set $X$ and a first-order sentence $\varphi$, let $M_X(\varphi)$ be the set of isomorphism types of models of $\varphi$ with ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
39 votes
3 answers
3k views

Can one show that the real field is not interpretable in the complex field without the axiom of choice?

We all know that the complex field structure $\langle\mathbb{C},+,\cdot,0,1\rangle$ is interpretable in the real field $\langle\mathbb{R},+,\cdot,0,1\rangle$, by encoding $a+bi$ with the real-number ...
Joel David Hamkins's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
222 views

Second-order strong minimality and amorphousness, take 2

Recently I asked a question about whether a second-order analogue of strong minimality could correspond to amorphous satisfiability (= having a model whose underlying set cannot be partitioned into ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
673 views

Can second-order logic identify "amorphous satisfiability"?

Recall that a set is amorphous iff it is infinite but has no partition into two infinite subsets. I'm interested in the possible structure (in the sense of model theory) which an amorphous set can ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
360 views

Do saturated models require choice?

Let $T$ be a first-order theory, and suppose we want to build a saturated model $\mathbb U$ of $T$. That is, we want a model $\mathbb U$ of cardinality bigger than $|T|$, saturated in its own ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 62.6k
7 votes
1 answer
282 views

Is the hereditary version of this weak finiteness notion nontrivial?

Say that a set $X$ is $\Pi^1_1$-pseudofinite if every first-order sentence $\varphi$ with a model with underlying set $X$ has a finite model. The existence of infinite $\Pi^1_1$-pseudofinite sets is ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
432 views

Is this notion of finiteness closed under unions?

This was asked and bountied at MSE without success. Throughout, we work in $\mathsf{ZF}$. Say that a set $X$ is $\Pi^1_1$-pseudofinite if for every first-order sentence $\varphi$, if $\varphi$ has a ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
424 views

What is first-order logic with Dedekind-finite sets of variables?

The usual set up of first-order logic is with an infinite reservoir of variables which we can use in formulas. This is one of the annoying reasons why we need to put $\aleph_0$ into the cardinal ...
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 38.5k

15 30 50 per page