Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
10 votes
0 answers
212 views

Is any choice axiom other than WISC inherited by Grothendieck topoi?

It is well known that even if one works with say ZFC as a base theory, Grothendieck topoi do not in general satisfy even fairly weak axioms like countable choice or small violations of choice and one ...
saolof's user avatar
  • 1,843
11 votes
1 answer
518 views

Is every set being cardinal definable consistent with ZF + negation of Choice?

Recall the definition of cardinal definable, where every set being cardinal definable is proved consistent relative to ZF + V=HOD. To re-iterate it: $Define: X \text { is cardinal definable} \iff \\\...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
312 views

Is choice over definable sets equivalent to AC over axioms of ZF-Reg.?

If we add the following axiom schema to ZF-Reg., would the resulting theory prove $\sf AC$? Definable sets Choice: if $\phi$ is a formula in which only the symbol $``y"$ occurs free, then: $$\forall X ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
526 views

Relation between AC and the axiom of foundation

The fact that the axiom of foundation doesn't imply the axiom of choice is pretty standard (the model Cohen created to prove the consistency of $\neg AC$ models the axiom of foundation as well), and ...
Maxime Ramzi's user avatar
  • 14.4k
4 votes
1 answer
168 views

Does this axiom (a weak form of class valued choice) has a name?

At some point in my work (which has nothing to do with set theoretics foundation) I need to consider the following axiom: For any set $X$, any class $V$ with a surjective map $f : V \...
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 40.8k
7 votes
8 answers
1k views

Result that follows from ZFC and not ZF but are strictly weaker than choice

A number of results that people use that require the axiom of choice (i.e. do not follow from ZF alone) are known to actually imply the axiom of choice. Therefore, one might naturally wonder whether ...
David Corwin's user avatar
  • 15.5k
12 votes
2 answers
7k views

Is it possible to show that an infinite set has a countable (infinite) subset, without using the Axiom of Choice?

Let X be an infinite set. Is it possible to show the existence of a countably infinite subset of X without using the Axiom of Choice?
tibet's user avatar
  • 185
28 votes
11 answers
7k views

Does the Axiom of Choice (or any other "optional" set theory axiom) have real-world consequences? [closed]

Or another way to put it: Could the axiom of choice, or any other set-theoretic axiom/formulation which we normally think of as undecidable, be somehow empirically testable? If you have a particular ...
DoubleJay's user avatar
  • 2,383
6 votes
2 answers
2k views

Axiom of Computable Choice versus Axiom of Choice

What would be the consequence of requiring that any choice function be computable; i.e. using as the foundational basis ZF + ACC? Does it make a difference if we admit definable functions? I guess I ...
Halfdan Faber's user avatar