Skip to main content

All Questions

5 votes
1 answer
266 views

Does weak countable choice imply that the Cauchy reals are Dedekind complete?

Assuming the axiom of weak countable choice, is the set of modulated Cauchy reals Dedekind complete? The second theorem on this ncatlab page claims something equivalent, but it doesn't contain a proof ...
Christopher King's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
364 views

Why is the double negation of the axiom of choice rarely considered?

In constructive/intuitionistic mathematics, it is common to reject the axiom of choice, because it is highly nonconstructive and implies the law of the excluded middle by Diaconescu's theorem/Bishop's ...
saolof's user avatar
  • 1,843
11 votes
1 answer
438 views

A weak form of countable choice

Let $\Omega$ be the set/type of truth values. We're using constructive logic. Define $AC_{0, 0} = \forall P : \mathbb{N}^2 \to \Omega, (\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \exists m \in \mathbb{N}, P(n, m)) \to ...
Mark Saving's user avatar
25 votes
1 answer
2k views

In what ways is ZF (without Choice) "somewhat constructive"

Let me summarize what I think I understand about constructivism: "Constructive mathematics" is generally understood to mean a variety of theories formulated in intuitionist logic (i.e., not assuming ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 30.8k
16 votes
2 answers
815 views

Cauchy real numbers with and without modulus

In constructive mathematics there are many possible inequivalent definitions of real numbers. The greatest variety seems to be in Dedekind-style approaches: in addition to "the" Dedekind real numbers ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 65.8k
14 votes
1 answer
2k views

Bishop quote stating that axiom of choice is constructively valid

This is about constructive mathematics, but it is not a research question. But since it may also be of interest for research mathematicians, I hope this question is appropriate for this forum. As ...
user104007's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
2k views

Axioms of Choice in constructive mathematics

There is a widely accepted opinion that the Axiom of Countable Choice (further, ACC) $$ \forall n\in \mathbb{N} . \exists x \in X . \varphi [n, x] \implies \exists f: \mathbb{N} \longrightarrow X . \...
Rubi Shnol's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
168 views

Does this axiom (a weak form of class valued choice) has a name?

At some point in my work (which has nothing to do with set theoretics foundation) I need to consider the following axiom: For any set $X$, any class $V$ with a surjective map $f : V \...
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 40.8k
2 votes
2 answers
991 views

Axiom of choice and convergence

Hi fellows, I was wondering. Is the axiom of choice used to show that $\mathbb{R}$ is complete? If yes, is there a way to construct monotonic bounded sequences that do not converge? Thanks in ...
Jean-Luc Bouchot's user avatar
27 votes
4 answers
12k views

Does constructing non-measurable sets require the axiom of choice?

The classic example of a non-measurable set is described by wikipedia. However, this particular construction is reliant on the axiom of choice; in order to choose representatives of $\mathbb{R} /\...
Mark Bell's user avatar
  • 3,145