Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
131 views

Which algebraic intuition can be used in fields

I wonder what basic laws of arithmetic of reals e.g. $x^n x^m = x^{m+n}$ holds for fields. Every time I take some book on abstract algebra it proves very abstract and unpractical properties. So I ...
Trismegistos's user avatar
  • 2,420
1 vote
1 answer
330 views

What properties do you lose when you extend your number set? [duplicate]

So in $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ you have both associative and commutative property, but as you extend to $\mathbb{H}$ you lose the commutative property, and $\mathbb{O}$ loses the associativity. ...
Frank Vel's user avatar
  • 5,339
3 votes
1 answer
180 views

Dedekind's Cuts Lemma

I'm studying Dedekind's Cuts and his construction of Real numbers from the Rational ones. Here we are allowed to use $\Bbb{Q}$ as an ordered field and all all its properties (Archimedean Property, his ...
Derso's user avatar
  • 2,811
1 vote
3 answers
171 views

What are all different (non-isomorphic) field structures on $\mathbb R \times \mathbb R$

We know that $\mathbb R \times \mathbb R$ forms a field under addition and multiplication defined as $(a,b)+(c,d)=(a+c,b+d)$ ; $(a,b)*(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)$ ; is there any other way to make $\mathbb R \...
Souvik Dey's user avatar
  • 8,387
2 votes
2 answers
3k views

Prove that $\sup f(x) \leq \inf g(y)$

Let $f: D \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ and $g: D\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be functions ($D$ nonempty). Suppose that $f(x) \leq g(y)$ for all $x\in D$ and $y \in D$. Show that $$\sup f(x) \leq \inf g(...
ayv2's user avatar
  • 349
0 votes
1 answer
70 views

Related Zorn's lemma proof?

Let $S$ be a partially ordered set, with the additional property that every chain $s_0\le s_1 \le s_2 \le...$ has an upper bound in $S$ (i.e. there is some $t$ in $S$ such that $s_n \le t$ for all $n$)...
Mark's user avatar
  • 27
76 votes
7 answers
33k views

Is an automorphism of the field of real numbers the identity map?

Is an automorphism of the field of real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ the identity map? If yes, how can we prove it? Remark An automorphism of $\mathbb{R}$ may not be continuous.
Makoto Kato's user avatar
  • 42.9k
9 votes
4 answers
2k views

Using Zorn's lemma show that $\mathbb R^+$ is the disjoint union of two sets closed under addition.

Let $\Bbb R^+$ be the set of positive real numbers. Use Zorn's Lemma to show that $\Bbb R^+$ is the union of two disjoint, non-empty subsets, each closed under addition.
Omar's user avatar
  • 517

15 30 50 per page
1
3 4 5 6
7