4
\$\begingroup\$

In the IPC 2221 is a table that specifies the required trace spacing. One thing that I find very surprising is the jump once the elevation is above 3050m. E.g. For an external conductor (uncoated) at 500V

  • up to 3050m above sea level: 2.5mm clearance
  • over 3050m above sea level: 12.5 mm clearance

The jump seems very abrupt. Why does IPC 2221 suddenly require a factor 5 more clearance? What is the rational?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's noteworthy that IPC-2221 is old and widely deprecated in favor of [actual] regulations e.g. IEC 60950-1 (itself rather old and there are superseding standards now). These largely use reasonable curves. Why IPC gave stepwise functions, who knows. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 8 at 13:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/646456/… \$\endgroup\$
    – winny
    Commented Jul 8 at 13:40

2 Answers 2

8
\$\begingroup\$

It comes from the Paschen's Law.

The following graph is a Paschen curve taken from this research.

Paschen Curve

The graph may look a bit awkward to make a conclusion as "required clearance increases with altitude."

The horizontal axis represents the distance between the two conductors in open air. Starting from a conductor-to-conductor distance of 0.1 mm and an altitude of up to 50 kft (~15250 m) the effect becomes more pronounced. For example, for a distance (clearance) of 0.2 mm, the breakdown voltage (the voltage enough to generate an arc) is about 2 kV at sea level and drops to 750 V at 10 kft (~3050 m).

A similar curve can be obtained by taking the horizontal axis as air pressure (decreases with altitude) for a constant conductor-to-conductor spacing.

IPC tables also include a correction factor so the numbers shown on the tables may not match to the graph above (or Paschen's experimental results).

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ As an aside, Paschen's Law is not limited to just two conductors. It applies in any situation where you have high E fields, as can occur in waveguides carrying high power RF or microwave. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented Jul 8 at 13:36
4
\$\begingroup\$

It's more of a one (or two, in this case) size fits all strategy. If you don't want to deal with calculating the exact factor for the altitude at which you'll be operating, then the values given will cover you in all circumstances, albeit in a somewhat more cumbersome fashion above 10000 feet.

IEC 60664-1 gives correction factors for altitudes up to 20km (snippet here if you don't want to pay $345 just to peek). You can see that the IPC values given ensure adequate clearance up to ~12km which covers all land on earth (Mt. Everest = 8849m).

And as always, IPC will let you substitute different values and remain in compliance. They just need to be agreed upon between the customer and the designer.

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.