Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
0 answers
63 views

Split Pauli Four-vector as quadratic terms of spinors

If I have the Pauli Four-vector $$x_{\mu}\sigma^{\mu} = \left(\begin{array}{cc} t+z & x-i y \\ x+i y & t-z \end{array}\right)$$ with $\sigma^0$ as Identity Matrix. Is there some way to write ...
Alexandre Masson Vicente's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
44 views

Is the Dirac adjoint in the representation dual to Dirac spinor?

As seen in this Wikipedia page, the Lorentz group is not compact and the Dirac spinor (spin $\frac{1}{2}$) representation is NOT unitary. Therefore, the complex conjugate representation does NOT ...
Keith's user avatar
  • 1,669
0 votes
0 answers
30 views

Schwichtenberg Physics from Symmetry p. 83 Eq 3.225

Firstly - an apology. This is my first question to Stack Exchange and also my first attempt at using Latex. I need to show a subscript letter with a dot above it, but can't work out how to do that ...
user404102's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
52 views

Trying to solve the energy levels of a spin 1/2 particle in a one-dimensional box using Dirac Equation

I was studying the problem I asked above in the title and found the article P Alberto et al 1996 Eur. J. Phys. 17 19. The wave function inside the walls is: $$ \psi(z)=B\ exp(ikz) \left[\begin{array}{...
Joao Pedro Medeiros's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
98 views

How to motivate spinors from the Dirac equation? [closed]

I am trying to motivate spinors by making sure the Dirac equation is relativistically invariant (and it suffices to discuss just the Dirac operator). Let $\{ e_i \}$ be an orthonormal frame and $x^i$ ...
Integral fan's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
55 views

What is the connection between Lorentz transforms on spinors and vectors?

When deriving the (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) representations of the Lorentz group one usually starts by describing how points in Minkowski space transform while preserving the speed of light (or the metric). ...
Alexander Haas's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
357 views

Can we make a Bloch sphere for Weyl spinors?

If spinors are the "square root" of 3-vectors [$\mathrm{SU}(2)$ double cover of $\mathrm{SO}(3)$], Weyl spinors can be thought of as the "square root" of 4-vectors [$\mathrm{SL}(2,\...
Mauricio's user avatar
  • 5,568
2 votes
0 answers
72 views

Interpretation of "spin-1/2" in classical Dirac field

I emphasize that the proceeding is purely classical physics. Consider the Grassmann-valued field (where $\mathcal{N}$ is a Grassmann number), which is a solution to the Dirac equation, given by $$\psi(...
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 2,676
0 votes
0 answers
54 views

Weyl spinors under the Lorentz transformation

I am reading An Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Maggiore. On page 28, it says Using the property of the Pauli matrices $\sigma^2 \sigma^i \sigma^2 = -\sigma^{i*}$ and the explicit form ...
user174967's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
94 views

Why is the derivative necessary to connect left and right-hand spinors?

I am studying Weyl and Dirac spinors. Suppose we have two Weyl fermions $\eta, \chi$ transforming under $(1/2,0)$ representation of the Lorentz group. I learned that to construct Lorentz invariant ...
IGY's user avatar
  • 1,783
2 votes
1 answer
120 views

Columns, rows, dotted, undotted, $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$ reps, and building Dirac spinors from Weyl spinors

I'm looking through Introduction to Supersymmetry by Muller-Kirsten and Wiedemann, along with any other resource I can find. I'm specifically trying to understand the concepts and notations for ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
1 vote
1 answer
73 views

Transformation of spinor reps and why the Dirac rep is its own conjugate

In Polchinski's String Theory volume 2, appendix B, on page 433 (in the section on Spinors and SUSY in various dimensions, specifically the subsection on Majorana spinors) he says: "It follows ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
0 votes
0 answers
186 views

Represent the Pauli 4-vector $\sigma^\mu$ as hermitian matrix of matrices due to the $SL(2,C)$ universal double cover of $SO^+(3,1)$

It's known that it's possible to map a 4-vector $x^\mu=(t,x,y,z)$, here i use $c=1$, into a 2x2 hermitian matrix as linear combination of Pauli matrices, thus the mapping $x^\mu \leftrightarrow X$. ...
Cuntista's user avatar
  • 310
1 vote
1 answer
213 views

Building 4-vectors out of Weyl spinors: Combining 2 independent Weyl spinors and a sigma matrix to get a 4-vector

i'm struggling with this problem In Exercise 2.3 of A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory of Michele Maggiore I am asked to show that, if $\xi_R$ and $\psi_R$ are right-handed spinors, then $$...
Cuntista's user avatar
  • 310
2 votes
0 answers
43 views

Representation theoretic constraints in SUSY algebra

Let's try to build from scratch the SUSY commutator $[Q_\alpha^I, P_\mu]$. We know that the result of this commutator must be a fermonic generator belonging to $(1/2, 0)\otimes(1/2,1/2) \simeq (1, 1/2)...
Jack Euler's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
266 views

Understanding spinors, double cover and professor's expanation

I'm following an introductory course in QFT, and we are facing the spin group part. I think that most of the details are left apart because it would take too much time to be developd, and my profesor ...
Heidegger's user avatar
  • 361
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

Question about spinor inner products

Let a 2D spinor be given by $$\chi_2(p)=\pmatrix{\xi^1\\\xi^2}+i\pmatrix{\xi^3\\\xi^4}$$ with the $\xi^i$'s being real for $i=\{1,2,3,4\}$. Assume, now, that I want to represent this spinor by a real-...
schris38's user avatar
  • 3,992
0 votes
0 answers
55 views

Questions on Lorentz generators in Spinor-Helicity formalism

I have read the following PSE posts on Lorentz generators in Spinor-Helicity formalism: Total Angular Momentum Operator in Spinor-Helicity formalism Derivation of conformal generators in spinor ...
schris38's user avatar
  • 3,992
0 votes
0 answers
112 views

Spin and Representation Theory

So for integer spin, the way I understand it mathematically (in a classical limit), is that under a Lorentz transformation (i.e. change of coordinates), spin $n$ particles transform like rank $n$ ...
Chris's user avatar
  • 269
-2 votes
1 answer
103 views

Wavefunction spinor in Dirac equation

Which is the physical interpretation that in Dirac's equation the wavefunction is a spinor?
appliedSciences's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
101 views

Question on the spinor Indices, in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

I've caught by a loop of: Standard texts of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics $\to$ Representation theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras of $SO(3)$ and $SU(2)$ $\to$ Discussions of infinitesimal ...
BasicMathGuy's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
149 views

Lorentz Invariance of kinetic terms for Weyl Spinors

Just to preface things, this exact question has been asked before here, but I don't feel like the answer really clarifies things for me. The core issue is that we want to construct a 4-vector that we ...
FranDahab's user avatar
  • 328
5 votes
1 answer
156 views

How do projective representations act on the QFT vacuum?

Let $U:\mathcal{G}\to \mathcal{U}(\mathcal{H})$ be a unitary projective representation of a symmetry group $\mathcal{G}$ on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. It satisfies the composition rule: $$U(g_1)U(...
nodumbquestions's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
236 views

Projective representations of the Lorentz group can't occur in QFT! What's wrong with my argument?

In flat-space QFT, consider a spinor operator $\phi_i$, taken to lie at the origin. Given a Lorentz transformation $g$, we have $$\tag{1} U(g)^\dagger \phi_i U(g) = D_{ij}(g)\phi_j$$ where $D_{ij}$ is ...
nodumbquestions's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

$S$-operator for proper Lorentz transformation

By applying infinitesimal Lorentz transformatios successively (with rotation angle $\omega$ around the $\bf n$ axis) one would get $$\Psi'(x') = \hat{S}\Psi(x) = e^{-(i/4)\omega\hat{\sigma}_{\mu\nu}(\...
Bruno Piveta's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
561 views

Bilinear covariants of Dirac field

In the book "Advanced quantum mechanics" by Sakurai there is a section (3.5) about bilinear covariants, however i can't really find a definition of these objects, neither in the book nor ...
dallla's user avatar
  • 59
1 vote
2 answers
100 views

Rotation by 360°, spin-1/2 fermions and quaternions

Rotating a spin-1/2 fermion by 360° multiplies the quantum state by -1. Representing a continuous 360° rotation as a quaternion is also a multiplication by -1. Is there a relationship between these ...
Tomek Czajka's user avatar
8 votes
3 answers
2k views

What are Dirac spinors and why did relativistic quantum mechanics need them?

I have a good grasp of the Schrödinger equation and the basics of special relativity But the Dirac equation is alien to me. What are Dirac spinors and why did Dirac use them?
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
97 views

What does quantization of spin have to do with spinors?

A fermion has half-integer spin. In the context of the theory, this means its wavefunction is made of spinors: geometric objects which, under Lorentz rotations, transform in such a way that they ...
Adam Herbst's user avatar
  • 2,475
0 votes
0 answers
75 views

Is there an analog of $\Lambda^T\eta\Lambda = \eta$ in any representation of the restricted Lorentz group?

The Lorentz group $O(1,3)$ is defined by $$\Lambda^T \eta \Lambda = \eta \quad(1)$$ which we call the defining representation. Given an irreducible representation of the restricted Lorentz group $SO^+...
user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
87 views

How does the two index spinor $(v_{a\dot{b}})$ transforms?

Using the Van der Waerden Notation, we define the four-vector as: $$v_{a\dot{b}}=v_\nu \sigma^\nu_{a\dot{b}}$$ I'm trying to see how this transforms. Defining: $$\Lambda \equiv e^{i\vec{\theta}\cdot \...
Young Kindaichi's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
81 views

Derivation of the transformation law for spinors

I'm reading the book Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Approach by Eduardo Fradkin, and I got stuck where the transformation law for spinors $$ \psi'(x') = S(\Lambda) \psi(x) $$ is derived. In ...
SrJaimito's user avatar
  • 601
3 votes
1 answer
187 views

What is the relationship between spinors and rotating motion geometrically?

Spinors are famously like spinning tops, but not actually like spinning tops since they are point particles and thus cannot rotate around their axis. It is easy to show algebraically how spinors must ...
user438236's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
66 views

Doubt on transformation laws of tensors and spinors using standard tensor calculus and group theory

1) Introduction From standard tensor calculus, here restricted to Minkowski spacetime, we learned that: A scalar field is a object that transforms as: $$\phi'(x^{\mu'}) = \phi(x^{\mu})\tag{1}$$ A ...
M.N.Raia's user avatar
  • 3,085
1 vote
1 answer
219 views

How to contract spinor indices?

In normal vector representation, vectors can be contracted as follows: $$v^\mu v_\mu$$ with one covariant and one contravariant index. But in spinor representation, there are 4 possible type of ...
Habouz's user avatar
  • 1,324
0 votes
1 answer
90 views

Lorentz boost property of gamma matrices

I was watching this video where he boosted the Dirac equation. He reached this equation: $$S^{-1}(\Lambda)\gamma^\mu S(\Lambda)=\Lambda^\mu{}_\nu \gamma^\nu$$ My question is since $\gamma^\mu$ is a ...
Habouz's user avatar
  • 1,324
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Can one express the evolution of a particle with a one-parameter group of $SO(3,1)$?

Can one express the evolution of a particles using a sequence of $SO(3,1)$ transformations? If yes, how? Is it sufficient to apply $SO(3,1)$ transformations to a spinor? $$ \psi(t) = e^{t\mathfrak{so}(...
Anon21's user avatar
  • 1,548
2 votes
0 answers
146 views

Angular-momentum of the Dirac spinor theory

The standard Dirac action $$ S = \int d^4 x \bar \psi (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi $$ is invariant under Lorentz transformation. In David Tong's lecture note, eq (4.96) lists that the ...
Lelouch's user avatar
  • 669
5 votes
2 answers
451 views

What is the idea behind 2-spinor calculus?

In the book by Penrose & Rindler of "Spinors and Space-Time", the preface says that there is an alternative to differential geometry and tensor calculus techniques known as 2-spinor ...
Cathartic Encephalopathy's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
212 views

Does the Dirac Spinor live in the complexification of the Lorentz group?

In this question I learned that when working with quaternionic representations of (the double cover of) our relevant orthogonal group, we cannot avoid working in complex vector spaces. However it is ...
Craig's user avatar
  • 1,117
3 votes
0 answers
147 views

Is the real spinor representation of the Lorentz group irreducible?

Specifically the $(\frac{1}{2},0)\oplus(0,\frac{1}{2})$ representation. Given that we label representations by the corresponding representations of the complexified Lie group, the direct sum can be ...
Craig's user avatar
  • 1,117
0 votes
1 answer
146 views

Quantum Field Theory Unitary Transformations

I am currently reading through Itzyskon and Zuber for my quantum field theory class, and I came across this regarding the unitary transformations of the Dirac bispinors in chapter 2. They show that ...
user132849's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
250 views

Linearization of the Klein-Gordon equation and decoupling of ''spinors''! [closed]

We know that the K-G equation is deduced from the Einstein relation: $E^{2}=m^{2} +\vec{p}^{2} \;\;\;\;$ (with $c=1$) It is known that :$E^{2}=\frac{m^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}}=\left(\frac{m}{1-\beta}\...
The Tiler's user avatar
  • 1,400
1 vote
2 answers
160 views

To construct a Lorentz scalar we use $\psi^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}\psi$. Could we use $\gamma^{5}$ instead of $\gamma^{0}$ seen as both are Hermitian?

Both $\gamma^{0}$ and $\gamma^{5}$ are Hermitian, so could we replace $\gamma^{0}$ with $\gamma^{5}$ to construct a Lorentz scalar with the same properties as $\bar{\psi}\psi$?
sputnik44's user avatar
  • 115
0 votes
0 answers
155 views

Unitarity and boost

I wonder if anyone could shed some light on the representation theory of the Lorentz group. In particular, I would like to understand unitary and spinorial representations of boosts better. To my ...
egj's user avatar
  • 9
0 votes
0 answers
298 views

Lorentz-invariant Lagrangian for spinor field

Schwartz book on QFT (page 167), Zee book on group (page 461) and Maggiore book on QFT (page 55), prove that $\psi_R^{\dagger}\sigma^{\mu}\psi_R$ is a 4-vector, where $\psi_R$ is a right-handed spinor ...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 613
2 votes
1 answer
276 views

How to prove Weyl spinors transform as a representation of Lorentz group?

In my QFT lecture notes, it is written that the Lorentz group elements can be written as \begin{equation*} \Lambda = e^{i\vec{\theta}\cdot\vec{J} + i\vec{\eta}\cdot\vec{K}} \end{equation*} where $\Big\...
Ishan Deo's user avatar
  • 1,588
5 votes
1 answer
889 views

Do the Dirac matrices form a proper four-vector?

I'm seeing many conflicting statements about Dirac's gamma matrices. Some say it's a four-vector, some say it isn't, some say it's an invariant four vector. I know the Dirac matrices satisfy the ...
Adots005's user avatar
  • 187
1 vote
2 answers
487 views

Rarita-Schwinger spin projection operators

Chapter 2 of the paper Symmetry of massive Rarita-Schwinger fields by T. Pilling mentions "the usual" spin projection operators. However, to me, they are not usual and I struggle with ...
infinitezero's user avatar
  • 1,312
0 votes
2 answers
371 views

Riemannian and Weyl tensors as spinor representation

There is the way of converting vector indices to spinor indices, for example, Maxwell stress tensor $F_{[\mu\nu]}$ can be decomposed to $(1,0) \oplus (0,1)$ irreducible representations of $\mathfrak{...
Nikita's user avatar
  • 5,707

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5