Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
1 answer
429 views

Parity transformations and Dirac Spinor

I'm reading "No-Nonsense quantum field theory" and I have some doubts about the transformation law for Dirac Spinors as explained by the author. In the book the left chiral spinors $\chi$ ...
mathripper's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
215 views

PT transformation of a spinor

By demanding the the Dirac equation be invariant under general Lorentz transformations, we get an equation for the transformation matrix of a Dirac spinor, $$ S^{-1}(\Lambda) \gamma^\mu S(\Lambda) = {\...
ersbygre1's user avatar
  • 2,648
0 votes
0 answers
249 views

How do time reversal and parity inversion act on a Majorana spinor in QFT?

Dirac particles are not the same Majorana particles. However, in the simple Lorentz group (boost and rotations, but no parity or time flips), they transform the same way. Particles in QFT were defined ...
don't train ai on me's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
588 views

Are pseudospinors valid or useful?

We all know that in addition to scalars and vectors, there are pseudoscalars and pseudovectors, which have an additional sign flip under parity. These are useful and necessary when constructing ...
knzhou's user avatar
  • 103k
5 votes
0 answers
666 views

Why parity exchanges right handed and left handed spinors

Reading through David Tong lecture notes on QFT. On pages 94, he shows the action of parity on spinors. See below link: QFT notes by Tong In (4.75) he confirms that parity exchanges right handed ...
user avatar
13 votes
2 answers
5k views

Conceptual interpretation of the left- and right-handed spinor representations of the Lorentz group

I understand mathematically that the Lorentz group's Lie algrebra $\mathfrak{so(3,1)}$ (given by eqns. (33.11)-(33.13) in Srednicki's QFT book) is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{su(2) \times su(2)}$ (given ...
tparker's user avatar
  • 48.4k
3 votes
1 answer
402 views

Different definitions of the parity transformation for the Dirac spinors

There are two definitions of the parity transformation acting on the Dirac spinors: $\Psi_P = \eta \gamma^0 \Psi$ with $\eta = i$ ($P^2=-1$ as in Srednicki) and $\eta=1$ ($P^2=+1$ as in Peskin & ...
user114001's user avatar