Skip to main content

Questions tagged [dirac-matrices]

Dirac matrices, or gamma matrices, are a set of matrices with specific anticommutation relations that generate a matrix representation of the Clifford algebra which acts on spinors, fundamental to the Dirac equation describing spin-1/2 charged particles.

2 votes
1 answer
50 views

$CP$-transformation for fermionic bilinears

I am trying to derive the transformation of the fermionic bilinear $\bar{\psi}\psi$ under $CP$ transformation. I know that $P$ acts as: $$\psi(t, \vec{x}) \xrightarrow{P} \gamma^0 \psi(t, -\vec{x})$$ ...
Damiano Scevola's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
73 views

Deriving the properties of the Dirac matrices

I am working on the properties of the Dirac matrices, but I cannot figure out the derivations. For example, on proving $\gamma^\mu {\not}{a} \gamma_\mu = -2{\not}{a}$, we first prove that $\gamma^\mu \...
user174967's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
87 views

Do gamma matrices commute with 4-vectors?

One of my exercises was to prove the identity $$\gamma^\mu\displaystyle{\not}a\gamma_\mu=-2\displaystyle{\not}a.$$ Which is trivial if $\gamma^\mu a_\nu=a_\nu \gamma^\mu$, as follows $$\gamma^\mu\...
agaminon's user avatar
  • 1,775
0 votes
0 answers
46 views

Fierz Identity in 2+1d

Wikipedia states an example of Fierz Identity, under the assumption of commuting spinors, the $\mathrm{V} \times \mathrm{V}$ product that can be expanded as, $$ \left(\bar{\chi} \gamma^\mu \psi\right)\...
Everlin Martins's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
98 views

How to motivate spinors from the Dirac equation? [closed]

I am trying to motivate spinors by making sure the Dirac equation is relativistically invariant (and it suffices to discuss just the Dirac operator). Let $\{ e_i \}$ be an orthonormal frame and $x^i$ ...
Integral fan's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
49 views

Fermi tetrad field: Fermi-Walker tetrad formalism?

These days I'm reading Dirac Eq in GR, and I'm confused about "Fermi tetrad field". Is it Fermi-Walker tetrad formalism?
Lou TY's user avatar
  • 1
1 vote
0 answers
80 views

Is there a $\gamma^{5}$ in $d$-dimensional Clifford Algebra?

I was trying to compute the EW vacuum polarization $$i\Pi_{LL}^{\mu\nu}=(-1)\mu^{\frac{\epsilon}{2}}e^{2}∫\frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^{d}}\frac{Tr\bigl(i\gamma^{\mu}(iP_{L})i(\not{k}+m_{i})(i\gamma^{\nu})P_{...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 475
2 votes
2 answers
312 views

The dimension of the Clifford algebra for the Dirac equation

The Dirac algebra contains sixteen linearly independent elements. In general, a Clifford algebra $\mathcal{C}\!\ell(V,Q)$ generated from a vector space $V$ equipped with a quadratic form $Q$ has ...
Nada Band's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
56 views

Obtaining the 16 elements of the Clifford algebra from the $\gamma^\mu$ generators

In my study of the Dirac equation, I have fully understood the "linearization" of the relativistic energy to obtain a matrix-valued equation that reduces to the Klein-Gordon equation if the ...
Nada Band's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
35 views

Question about meaning of "bar"-ing in the context of Dirac fields

Following chapter 38 of Srednicki, "bar"-ing means (based on eq. 38.15) $$\bar{A} = \beta A^\dagger\beta$$ One can show for instance that $$\bar{\gamma^\mu} = \gamma^\mu$$ My question is, ...
JohnA.'s user avatar
  • 1,713
0 votes
2 answers
69 views

Understanding derivation of Klein-Gordon equation from Dirac equation

Above is Tong's notes which shows how the Klein-Gordon equation is derived from Dirac equation. But I don't get why: $\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu} = \frac{1}{2} \{\gamma^{\mu},\...
Stallmp's user avatar
  • 665
0 votes
0 answers
75 views

Dirac field charge conjugation

I struggled a bit to understand the proof of the relation $C\overline\psi\psi C=\overline\psi\psi$ in Peskin's and Schroeder's book An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (page 70, formula 3.147): $$...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 603
0 votes
1 answer
39 views

Covariant derivative property

I am trying to demonstrate this propertie $$ \not{D}^2= \mathcal{D}^\mu \mathcal{D}_\mu-\frac{i}{4}\left[\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\right] F_{\mu \nu} $$ where $\not{}~$ is the Feynmann slash, and $D_\mu ...
Gorga's user avatar
  • 161
1 vote
1 answer
112 views

Feynman slash identity

How would one simplify the expression $\gamma^0 {\not}p \;\gamma^0$ ? My guess would be that its $$\begin{align} \gamma^0 {\not}p \;\gamma^0&=\gamma^0 \gamma^{\mu} p_{\mu} \;\gamma^0\\ &=\...
MVPlanet's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
46 views

Can $\gamma^5$ matrices be ignored in $q\bar{q}\to ZZ$ processes?

In the $q\bar{q}\to ZZ$ process, the following Feynman diagram in LO appears: This means for each vertex, the Feynman amplitude contains a term proportional to $(g_V-g_A\gamma^5)$, which makes $D$-...
Ozzy's user avatar
  • 172

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
38