Skip to main content

All Questions

37 votes
3 answers
12k views

What's the relationship between $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$, $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ and $SO(1,3)$?

I'm a beginner of QFT. Ref. 1 states that [...] The Lorentz group $SO(1,3)$ is then essentially $SU(2)\times SU(2)$. But how is it possible, because $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ is a compact Lie group ...
346699's user avatar
  • 5,971
28 votes
2 answers
3k views

Wick rotation and spinors

I am quite familiar with use of Wick rotations in QFT, but one thing annoys me: let's say we perform it for treating more conveniently (ie. making converge) a functional integral containing spinors; ...
toot's user avatar
  • 2,926
26 votes
4 answers
1k views

How does complexifying a Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ to $\mathfrak{g}_\mathbb{C}$ help me discover representations of $\mathfrak{g}$?

I have been studying a course on Lie algebras in particle physics and I could never understand how complexifying helps us understand the original Lie algebra. For example, consider $\mathfrak{su}(2)$...
Hermitian_hermit's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
266 views

Understanding spinors, double cover and professor's expanation

I'm following an introductory course in QFT, and we are facing the spin group part. I think that most of the details are left apart because it would take too much time to be developd, and my profesor ...
Heidegger's user avatar
  • 361
26 votes
2 answers
13k views

Dirac, Weyl and Majorana Spinors

To get to the point - what's the defining differences between them? Alas, my current understanding of a spinor is limited. All I know is that they are used to describe fermions (?), but I'm not sure ...
Phibert's user avatar
  • 1,306
7 votes
2 answers
2k views

Regarding the Weyl spinor and its transformation properties

I am trying to prove the Lorentz invariance of the (left-handed) Weyl Lagrangian: $$\mathcal L=i\psi^\dagger\bar\sigma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi$$ A Lorentz transformation is realized as $\psi\to M\psi$, ...
AccidentalFourierTransform's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
1k views

Why is the $(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$ representation of the Lorentz group realized as the vector space of Hermitian $2\times 2$ matrices?

Why can we write an arbitrary object $v_{a \dot{b} }$ our transformations in this basis act on as $$ v_{a \dot{b} } = v_{\nu} \sigma^{ \nu}_{a \dot{b} } = v^0 \begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&1 \...
Tim's user avatar
  • 1,872
13 votes
2 answers
5k views

Conceptual interpretation of the left- and right-handed spinor representations of the Lorentz group

I understand mathematically that the Lorentz group's Lie algrebra $\mathfrak{so(3,1)}$ (given by eqns. (33.11)-(33.13) in Srednicki's QFT book) is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{su(2) \times su(2)}$ (given ...
tparker's user avatar
  • 48.4k
8 votes
2 answers
756 views

Does Wightman's unitary $U(\Lambda)$ really exist for Lorentz boost?

This question is related to another question here. But I am asking a more fundamental question about the existence of Wightman's unitary $U(\Lambda)$ for Lorentz transformation. Let $\psi^\alpha$ be a ...
MadMax's user avatar
  • 4,452
4 votes
2 answers
2k views

What are the actual transformation properties of Dirac spinors $u_\sigma(p)$?

Let $u_\sigma(p)$ be a Dirac spinor. As far as I know, it transforms under changes of reference frame according to $$ u_\sigma(p)=S(\Lambda)u_\sigma(\Lambda p)\tag{1} $$ where the $\sigma$ label doesn'...
AccidentalFourierTransform's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

How do simple two-component Fierz identities follow from a property of the Pauli matrices?

On page 51 Peskin and Schroeder are beginning to derive basic Fierz interchange relations using two-component right-handed spinors. They start by stating the trivial (but tedious) Pauli sigma identity ...
theage's user avatar
  • 566
0 votes
1 answer
666 views

Transformation of the spinor indices of Hermitian $2\times 2$ matrices under the Lorentz group

The left-handed Weyl operator is defined by the $2\times 2$ matrix $$p_{\mu}\bar{\sigma}_{\dot{\beta}\alpha}^{\mu} = \begin{pmatrix} p^0 +p^3 & p^1 - i p^2\\ p^1 + ip^2 & p^0 - p^3 \end{...
nightmarish's user avatar
  • 3,203
29 votes
3 answers
12k views

Lorentz transformation of Gamma matrices $\gamma^{\mu}$

From my understanding, gamma matrices transforms under Lorentz transformation $\Lambda$ as \begin{equation} \gamma^{\mu} \rightarrow S[\Lambda]\gamma^{\mu}S[\Lambda]^{-1} = \Lambda^{\mu}_{\nu}\gamma^{\...
user113988's user avatar
21 votes
2 answers
5k views

Interpretation of Dirac Spinor components in Chiral Representation?

I failed to find any book or pdf that explains clearly how we can interpret the different components of a Dirac spinor in the chiral representation and I'm starting to get somewhat desperate. This is ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.1k
13 votes
3 answers
10k views

Dirac spinor and Weyl spinor

How can it be shown that the Dirac spinor is the direct sum of a right-handed Weyl spinor and a left-handed Weyl spinor? EDIT: - Let $\psi_L$ and $\psi_R$ be 2 component left-handed and right-handed ...
SRS's user avatar
  • 26.8k

15 30 50 per page