Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
0 answers
64 views

Deriving a contradiction from the LSZ condition

I'm reading the LSZ reduction formula in the wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSZ_reduction_formula To make the argument simple, let $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}(\partial \varphi)^2 - \frac{1}{2}...
Sung Kan's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
74 views

Quantization of a massless scalar

Let $t$:time, $r$:distance, and $u=t-r$. Since any massless particle should propagate along u=const. , we need to change the asymptotic infinity of a massless scalar from time infinity to null ...
gerogero's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
114 views

Schrodinger's picture and Heisenberg's picture in finding interaction ground state and two-point correlator

In section 4.2 of An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by M.E.Peskin and others, it derives interaction ground state by observing the time evolution of ground state in free field theory (pg.86), ...
Ting-Kai Hsu's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
121 views

Explict Form of Ground State in Interacting Field Theory

In An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Peskin and Schroeder chapter 4, it has discussed about the ground state $|\Omega\rangle$ (where $|0\rangle$ is the ground state in free field theory) in ...
Ting-Kai Hsu's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
296 views

Derivation of Peskin & Schroeder eq. (4.29)

Background material: These are the parts that I can follow. Previously Peskin & Schroeder have derived already the expression of the interaction ground state $|\Omega\rangle$ in terms of the free ...
Rescy_'s user avatar
  • 838
3 votes
0 answers
151 views

LSZ reduction formula and connected Feynman diagrams in Peskin & Schroeder [duplicate]

I don't understand why in the LSZ reduction formula I need to consider only connected Feynman diagrams when I compute scattering amplitudes. From what I read in Peskin & Schroeder it seems that ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 357
2 votes
0 answers
77 views

LSZ theorem for trivial scattering

The $1\to1$ scattering amplitude is trivial and is given by (take massless scalars for simplicity) $$ \tag{1} \langle O(\vec{p}) O^\dagger(\vec{p}\,')\rangle = (2 | \vec{p}\,|) (2\pi)^{D-1} \delta^{(...
stringynonsense's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
56 views

Conservation of angular momentum in LSZ reduction formula

I recently solved a problem involving calculating an LSZ reduction formula for the decay of a polarized photon into two pions. Specifically, I wrote an expression for the matrix element $\langle p_+,...
user1394273's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
187 views

Angular momentum and the $S$-matrix

I have been curious about the status of angular momentum in the context of the $S$-matrix and scattering amplitudes. In particular, if we pass to a classical scattering problem and imagine scattering ...
Panopticon's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
91 views

Some calculation in Mahan book, p73 [closed]

On page 73 of Mahan, Many-particle physics, 3rd edition, one finds $$ _0\langle|S(-\infty,0) = e^{-iL}_0\langle|S(\infty,-\infty)S(-\infty,0). $$ I'm wondering why this is true, as in the previous ...
user2820579's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
181 views

Calculate first-order term of the $S$-matrix for the $\phi^{4}$ theory [closed]

Before I ask a question, I will start with a small introduction. I want to evaluate the $S$-matrix order-by-order in an expansion in small $\lambda$ for a $2 \rightarrow 2$ scattering in $\phi^{4}$ ...
Jochem4T's user avatar
  • 237
2 votes
1 answer
159 views

Confusion regarding the $S$-matrix in Quantum Field Theory

In his Harvard lectures on QFT, Sidney Coleman defines the $S$-matrix as, $$ S \equiv U_{I}(\infty, -\infty) $$ Where $U_{I}(-\infty, \infty)$ is the time evolution operator in the interaction picture....
ShKol's user avatar
  • 322
3 votes
1 answer
183 views

Sidney Coleman's Lectures Notes on QFT: Question regarding incoming states and free states

In Sidney Coleman's Lecture Notes on Quantum Field Theory, under section 7.4, we have the following, For a scattering of particles in a potential, we have a very simple formula for the S-matrix. We ...
ShKol's user avatar
  • 322
3 votes
1 answer
326 views

General interpretation of the poles of the propagator

I am somewhat familiar with the fact that the poles of the Feynman propagator in QFT give the momentum of particle states. I'm also familiar with the KL spectral representation in that context (See ...
P. C. Spaniel's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

How to apply multiple Klein-Gordon operators to products of propagators?

I have the 4-point correlation function for a scalar free field $$ \langle{0} | T \phi_1 \phi_2 \phi_3 \phi_4 | 0 \rangle = -\left[ \Delta_F(x_1-x_2) \Delta_F(x_3-x_4) + \Delta_F(x_1-x_3) \Delta_F(x_2-...
SrJaimito's user avatar
  • 601

15 30 50 per page
1
2
3 4 5
31