Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
52 views

Square of the Feynman amplitude for $a +b\to c+d$ and its reverse

In quantum field theory, if a process $a +b\to c+d$ is allowed by a certain interaction Lagrangian (hermitian), the reverse process, $c+d\to a+b$, must also be allowed (as far as I understand) by the ...
Solidification's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
65 views

Field redefinitions in the Higgs mechanism

Consider the Higg's mechanism for a simple $U(1)$ theory. Leaving aside the lagrangian which consists of a kinetic term for the gauge field, a covariant derivative term and the potential term for the ...
Nakshatra Gangopadhay's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
104 views

What is a particle in the context of QFT with interactions?

This is a crossposting of the same question from mathoverflow: https://mathoverflow.net/q/454768/ It seems that this question was not received well there, claiming that this question is not ...
Mehmet Coen's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
70 views

Redefinition of fields and interpretation of the particle content

Suppose I have some Lagrangian $\mathcal L_1$ involving multiple fields $\phi_i$ with interactions. I can reparametrize the Lagrangian in terms of new fields $\psi_i$ by inserting some ...
F.Burton's user avatar
  • 153
2 votes
2 answers
227 views

Polology of Feynman amplitudes, Section 10.2, Weinberg

In Weinberg's QFT Volume 1 section 10.2, we basically find that we have a pole when we have an intermediate particle state; the momentum of the intermediate state is on-shell. I am having trouble ...
physicsbootcamp's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
147 views

LSZ reduction formula relation

LSZ formula gives a relation between the scattering amplitudes and correlators as $$\langle f |i \rangle = (-i)^{m+n}\int \Pi_{i=1}^m d^4x_, e^{ik_i'x_i (\Box_{x_i} -m^2)}\Pi_{j=1}^n d^4x_, e^{ik_j ...
Monopole's user avatar
  • 3,464
3 votes
0 answers
97 views

Adiabatic turn-on of free multi-particle states

Consider a second-quantized operator $\mathcal{H}_{full}$ describing some interacting QFT, whose action is known on a set of Fock states $\{\mathcal{|F\rangle}\}$, which, in turn, are the eigenstates ...
mavzolej's user avatar
  • 2,921
2 votes
0 answers
107 views

Energy Renormalization and Vacuum Diagrams

I have been reading the lecture notes of Coleman's course on QFT. When developing scattering theory with the use of a cutoff function, he mentions that, in order to ensure that the free vacuum ...
Ivan Burbano's user avatar
  • 3,915
5 votes
1 answer
801 views

Trouble deriving expression for differential scattering cross section from $S$-matrix

I am following the derivation of the scattering cross-section from Peskin and Schroeder textbook. On page 105, we get an expression for the differential cross-section: $$d\sigma = \left(\prod_f \frac{...
shadowbiscuit's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
181 views

What is particle under potential in quantum field theory?

Let's say we solve the Schrodinger equation with infinite well. We can quantize the field by the resonance state and can get the annihilation and creation operator. So we will get the sort of particle ...
hbadger19042's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
690 views

Why do we need to embed particles into fields?

In QFT we have the so-called embeding of particles into fields. This is discussed at full generality in Weinberg's book, chapter 5. In summary what one does is: From Wigner's classification, for each ...
Gold's user avatar
  • 36.4k
9 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is an interacting QFT Hilbert space a physical particles Fock space?

There are "Lectures on Quantum Field Theory" by P.A.M. Dirac, in which he claims that QFT state space is not a separable Hilbert space. Also, I have seen some research papers (in axiomatic QFT), which ...
warlock's user avatar
  • 749
4 votes
1 answer
746 views

Status of particles in interacting QFT

From my readings in QFT and answers such as this, I've read that the concept of particles and particle-number in interacting systems becomes ill-defined in QFT. Of course, in the real world, a number ...
Dragonsheep's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
2k views

How to tell whether a Feynman diagram is $t$-channel or $s$-channel by looking?

By looking at a diagram, how does one tell whether it represents a $s$-channel process or a $t$-channel process i.e., without finding the amplitude? I'm familiar with Mandelstam variables but I've ...
SRS's user avatar
  • 26.8k
6 votes
1 answer
261 views

S-Matrix Interpretation and Predictions

How does one distinguish between the second-loop contribution of a known particle, and the first-loop contribution of a more massive-and as yet undiscovered-particle in the S-matrix and/or ...
Optimus Prime's user avatar

15 30 50 per page