All Questions
Tagged with quantum-field-theory operators
715
questions
1
vote
2
answers
201
views
Using Wick's Theorem in an example with the harmonic oscillator
I understand Wick's theorem to be,
$$T(x)=\mathcal{N}(x)=\sum:\textbf{all contractions}:$$
And I'm researching combinatorics and quantum theory in general.
How would one connect Wicks theorem to the ...
2
votes
2
answers
81
views
How does inserting an operator in the path integral change the equation of motion?
I am reading this review paper "Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics". In equation (2.43)-(2.47), the paper tried to prove that when
$$U_g(\Sigma_2)=\exp\...
1
vote
0
answers
122
views
On which bundle do QFT fields live?
In QFT, there is a vector field of electromagnetism, usually notated by $A$, which transforms as a 1-form under coordinate changes. Since quantum fields are operator-valued, I thought it is a section ...
3
votes
1
answer
249
views
Derivation of two-body Coulomb interaction in momentum space
$\newcommand{\vec}{\mathbf}$
In Condensed Matter Field Theory by Altland and Simons, they claim the two-body Coulomb interaction for the nearly-free electron model for a $d$-dimensional cube with side ...
0
votes
0
answers
31
views
Why the Slavnov operator is self-adjoint? [duplicate]
In the context of BRST we can define the Slavnov operator $\Delta_{BRST}$ which generates BRST transformations. My lecture notes claim that $\Delta_{BRST}$ is self-adjoint, but I don't see why.
0
votes
2
answers
116
views
Do different bases of Fock space commute?
$\newcommand\dag\dagger$
Suppose we have a Fock space $\mathcal{F}$ with two different bases of creation and annihilation operators $\{a_\lambda, a^\dag_\lambda\}$ and $\{a_{\tilde \lambda}, a^\dag_{\...
2
votes
1
answer
468
views
Primary fields in di Francesco's CFT
In the CFT book by Di Francesco et al. they use conventions such that part of the conformal algebra (see eq. 4.19) is
$$
[D,P_\mu]=iP_\mu, \\
[D,K_\mu]=-iK_\mu, \tag{1}
$$
where $P_\mu$, $D$ and $K_\...
3
votes
0
answers
106
views
The commutation relations of photon and gluon?
In QED, the photon field has the following commutation relations:
\begin{equation}
[A^{\mu}(t,\vec{x}),A^{\nu}(t,\vec{y})]=0, \tag{1}
\end{equation}
where $A^{\mu}(t,\vec{x})$ is the photon filed. ...
3
votes
1
answer
287
views
Time-evolution operator in QFT
I am self studying QFT on the book "A modern introduction to quantum field theory" by Maggiore and I am reading the chapter about the Dyson series (chapter 5.3).
It states the following ...
-1
votes
0
answers
39
views
How to get $ H=\int\widetilde{dk} \ \omega a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})a(\mathbf{k})+(\mathcal{E}_0-\Omega_0)V $ in Srednicki 3.30 equation?
We have integration is
\begin{align*}
H =-\Omega_0V+\frac12\int\widetilde{dk} \ \omega\Big(a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})a(\mathbf{k})+a(\mathbf{k})a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})\Big)\tag{3.26}
\end{align*}
where
\...
11
votes
3
answers
636
views
Why can the time-ordered exponentials be brought to the right?
Having worked through almost all calculations in section 4.2 of Peskin & Schroeder's An Introduction to QFT, I still don't get why we can get to Eq. (4.31)
\begin{equation}
\langle\Omega|\mathcal{...
4
votes
0
answers
107
views
Canonical commutation relation in QFT
The canonical commutation relation in QFT with say one (non-free) scalar real field $\phi$ is
$$[\phi(\vec x,t),\dot \phi(\vec y,t)]=i\hbar\delta^{(3)}(\vec x-\vec y).$$
Is this equation satisfied by ...
3
votes
0
answers
77
views
Application of Callias operator in physics
In his article "Axial Anomalies and Index Theorems on Open Spaces" C.Callias shows how the index of the Callias-type operator on $R^{n}$ can be used to study properties of fermions in the ...
2
votes
2
answers
351
views
Relationship between normal-ordered vacuum state and parity operator
In the paper "Operator ordering in quantum optics
theory and the development of Dirac’s
symbolic method" by Hong-yi Fan, as referenced in this question, the authors mention the property
$$:A:...
2
votes
1
answer
628
views
What's the difference in defining normal ordering as $:c c^\dagger:=c^\dagger c$ vs $:c^\dagger c:=c^\dagger c- \langle c^\dagger c \rangle$?
If I understood correctly there are two terms called normal ordering:
$:c c^\dagger: = c^\dagger c \hspace{.5cm}$so shifting all creation operators to the left and all annihilation operators to the ...