Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
2 answers
148 views

Particle Creation by a Classical Source (on-shell mass momenta)

It is noted in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT text that the momenta used in the evaluation of the field operator $\phi(x)$ are "on mass-shell": $p^2=m^2$. Specifically, this is in relation to ...
Albertus Magnus's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
117 views

Show that $i/2m\int d^3\vec x\hat\pi(\vec x)\partial^2_i\hat\phi(\vec x)=1/(2\pi)^3\int d^3\vec p E(\vec p)\hat a(\vec p)^\dagger\hat a(\vec p)$ [closed]

Show that the quantum field for the Hamiltonian, $$\hat H=\frac{i}{2m}\int d^3 \vec x\hat{\pi}(\vec x)\partial^2_i\hat{\phi}(\vec x)\tag{1}$$ can be written as $$\int \frac{d^3\vec p}{(2\pi)^3}E(\vec ...
Electra's user avatar
  • 295
0 votes
1 answer
80 views

Confusion on the signs in the complex scalar field [closed]

I saw there are different ways we can write down the complex scalar field. For example, in most textbooks I can find, this is defined as $$\phi(x) =\int \dfrac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2E_p}}\...
IGY's user avatar
  • 1,783
0 votes
0 answers
111 views

Total momentum operator for the KG field

This question pertains to Equation (2.33) in Peskin and Schroeder: $$ \hat{\vec P}=-\int d^3\!x\,\hat\pi(\vec x)\vec\nabla\hat\phi(\vec x)=\int d^3\!p\,\vec p\,\hat a_{\vec p}^\dagger\,\hat a_{\vec p} ...
hodop smith's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
248 views

Quantization of non-relativistic complex scalar field

I found that the taking the non-relativistic limit of the Lagrgangian for complex scalar fields gives $$\mathcal{L} = i\dot{\psi}\psi^* -\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi \nabla\psi^*.\tag{1}$$ Now, when we ...
Souroy's user avatar
  • 193
-1 votes
1 answer
208 views

Field operators on vacuum

What do the field operators $\psi$ and $\pi$ produce when they act on vacuum $|0>$ state? Here, $$\psi(\vec{x}) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2E_p}}\left(a_p e^{i\vec{p}\cdot \vec x} ...
niket's user avatar
  • 21
3 votes
1 answer
119 views

Can we obtain an exact answer when we sum Feynman diagrams to all orders?

Consider a $\phi^4$ theory in QFT. Following Peskin & Schroeder's QFT chapter 4, we can do some calculations of correlation functions using perturbation expansion. On their book's page 83, they ...
Daren's user avatar
  • 1,421
1 vote
2 answers
265 views

What are Test Functions in QFT (physics context)?

In terms of mode function solutions of the KG equation, the field operator can be written as $$ \hat{\phi}(x) = \int_{R^3} d^3\textbf{p}\space \left(u_\textbf{p} \hat{a}_\textbf{p}+ u^*_\textbf{p}\hat{...
Ef00's user avatar
  • 136
2 votes
0 answers
78 views

QFT Formalism, Relation between different POVs

A Klein-Gordon field on a Minkowski background can be written in the following expansion $$ \hat{\phi}(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2E_p}} (\hat{a}_p e^{-ip x} + \hat{a}^\dagger_p e^{...
Ef00's user avatar
  • 136
0 votes
0 answers
123 views

Calculating the contraction of a field operator and a creation operator

In Folland's Quantum Field Theory (section 6.4) he considers a field: $$\phi_\pi = \sum_\tau \int f(\textbf{q})\big[u(\textbf{q}, \tau, \pi)a(\textbf{q}, \tau, \pi) e^{-iq_\mu x^\mu} + v(\textbf{q}, \...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,350
9 votes
3 answers
3k views

How do we know that all quantum fields are Fourier transforms of creation and annihilation operators?

In Folland's book Quantum Field Theory, he says ...we start out with classical field equations and a relativistically invariant Lagrangian from which they are derived, then replace the classical ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,350
5 votes
1 answer
305 views

What does it mean to apply a creation or annihilation operator to a free field, e.g. $\langle 0|a(p)\varphi(x)| 0 \rangle$?

I am self studying Quantum Field Theory, and I am starting to get a little lost. So far, I have studied free fields and some basic computations involving them, such as creation and annihilation ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,350
1 vote
1 answer
54 views

Generalized conjugate momenta and the generalized Fourier transform

Let the Lagrangian be a functional of $\hat{\phi}$ and $\partial_{\mu}\hat{\phi}$, i.e. $\hat{L} = L(\hat{\phi},\partial_{\mu}\hat{\phi})$, where $\hat{\phi}$ is an operator. The conjugate momenta is ...
Angela's user avatar
  • 1,023
0 votes
0 answers
153 views

Time dependent operators in QFT

In Quantum field theory, how does one define time-dependent operators? For example, let me generalize the operator fermion $\psi$: $\psi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{2 (\pi)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2E_p}} \sum_s \...
Angela's user avatar
  • 1,023
1 vote
1 answer
91 views

What's the rationale of replacing the Fourier coefficients in a field expansion by operators?

Let's take a look on the particular case of the Fourier expansion of the Klein-Gordon field: $$\psi (x,t) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2E_0(p)}[a(p)e^{i(E_0(p)t-px)}+a^\star (p)e^ {-i(E_0(p)t-...
Gerald's user avatar
  • 500

15 30 50 per page