Skip to main content

Questions tagged [ordinals]

In the ZF set theory ordinals are transitive sets which are well-ordered by $\in$. They are canonical representatives for well-orderings under order-isomorphism. In addition to the intriguing ordinal arithmetics, ordinals give a sturdy backbone to models of ZF and operate as a direct extension of the positive integers for *transfinite* inductions.

1 vote
0 answers
67 views

How is transifnite recursion applied?

I've been struggling to understand how ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation, along with the Aleph function $\aleph$, are defined using Transfinite Recursion in Jech's Set Theory or ...
Sam's user avatar
  • 5,166
2 votes
1 answer
90 views

What is cardinality of ordinal exponentiation?

Using von Neumann definition of ordinals, is it true that for all cardinal numbers $a$ and $b$ the following equation holds: $$ a^b = |a^{(b)}| $$ where on the left side is the cardinal exponentiation ...
Iskander's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
27 views

Find unbounded sequence in an ordinal product of regular uncountable cardinals

I'm a little stuck here (and should mention that I lack experience with unbounded sets in the transfinite): Say we have two uncountable regular cardinals $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ where $\kappa < \...
Nibbler's user avatar
  • 57
0 votes
1 answer
55 views

Ordinal number closed for countable sum

I want to find an ordinal number $\beta$ such that $\sup\{\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\dotsc\}+1<\beta$ for any (countable) sequences $\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\dotsc< \beta$. I know that the least uncountable ...
Gizerst Nanari's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
80 views

Hessenberg sum/natural sum of ordinals definition

I was given the following definition of Hessenberg sum: Definition. Given $\alpha,\beta \in \text{Ord}$ their Hessenberg sum $\alpha \oplus \beta$ is defined as the least ordinal greater than all ...
lelouch_l8r4's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
75 views

Exercise 7.1.6 Introduction to Set Theory by Hrbacek and Jech

This is exercise 7.1.6 of the book Introduction to Set Theory 3rd ed. by Hrbacek and Jech. Let $h^{*}(A)$ be the least ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists no function with domain $A$ and range $\...
Alphie's user avatar
  • 4,827
2 votes
1 answer
42 views

If $X_1$,$X_2$ are wosets isomorphic to ordinals $\alpha_1,\alpha_2$ then $X_1\times X_2$ is isomorphic to $\alpha_2\cdot \alpha_1$

I want to prove the following: Let $X_1$,$X_2$ be wosets, isomorphic to ordinals $\alpha_1,\alpha_2$ respectively. Then $X_1\times X_2$, with the lexicographic order, is isomorphic to $\alpha_2\cdot\...
Alphie's user avatar
  • 4,827
4 votes
2 answers
216 views

How does one construct $\omega + \omega$ in ZFC?

I can't figure out what axioms allow me to construct it. Most of the answers I've encountered say to define $f(x,y) := y = \omega + x$ and use Replacement, but I don't see how that would work. $+$ ...
ChainOfChoice's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
166 views

What ways are there to define $\aleph$?

I've seen some posts on this website that consist in providing and comparing different proofs of a theorem (e.g. for Taylor's Theorem or trigonometric identities). Currently I'm reading Holz's ...
Sam's user avatar
  • 5,166
1 vote
1 answer
55 views

Transitive closure of an ordinal is the ordinal itself?

Let $\lambda\in \mathbb{ON}$, then is it true that $\text{trcl}(\lambda)=\lambda$? I think this is true, since an ordinal is already a transitive set, so it contains all of its subsets, and their ...
J.R.'s user avatar
  • 481
2 votes
1 answer
58 views

Why does regularity of an ordinal $\gamma$ imply the existence of a sequence $(\delta_n)$ such that $\delta_n<\gamma$ for all $n$?

Source: Set Theory by Kenneth Kunen. Lemma III.6.2: Let $\gamma$ be any limit ordinal, and assume that $\kappa:=cf(\gamma)>\omega$. Then the intersection of any family of fewer than $\kappa$ club ...
Dick Grayson's user avatar
  • 1,467
0 votes
1 answer
61 views

Proof of the Reflection Theorem in Kunen?

I'm reading Kunen's Set Theory and the last line of the proof of the Reflection theorem (page 131) is a bit puzzling to me. To those not in possession of Kunen at the moment, the book states verbatim: ...
J.R.'s user avatar
  • 481
0 votes
0 answers
45 views

How can we simplify $\omega^{\omega\times \omega}$?

I am trying to understand the ordinal $\omega^{\omega\times \omega}$, can it be simplified? I come across this ordinal number as the fixed point of the normal function $\alpha\mapsto \alpha^\omega$ ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,223
0 votes
0 answers
27 views

Being unbounded in a limit ordinal implies order type is also a limit?

Whilst trying to follow a proof from my lecture notes, I stumbled upon the following: $$\gamma \text{ limit, }A\subseteq \gamma, \sup A=\gamma\implies \text{type}(A)\text{ limit}$$ It sounds true, ...
J.R.'s user avatar
  • 481
1 vote
1 answer
63 views

Why do we define cardinality only for well-orderable sets?

I'm revising Kunen's Set Theory and he mentions that when we define the cardinality of a set, we should do it with well-orderable sets. Why is this the case? He points to a section which contains many ...
J.R.'s user avatar
  • 481

15 30 50 per page