Skip to main content

All Questions

4 votes
0 answers
105 views

Why does proof of Zorn's lemma need to use the fact about ordinals being too large to be a set?

I'm not understanding why its necessary to invoke the knowledge about ordinals in order to prove Zorn's lemma. The Hypothesis in Zorn's lemma is Every chain in the set Z has an upper bound in Z Then ...
Pecan Lim's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
102 views

Using a form of the Axiom of Choice to prove the Well Ordering Theorem

I have been studying ordinals on my own for a few weeks now, and I have just gone through the proof for Hartogs' lemma, that given $S$ a set, $\exists \alpha$ an ordinal s.t. there is no injective ...
Nylonco's user avatar
  • 93
2 votes
1 answer
104 views

Can $ZF$ construct this function?

Is it possible in the $ZF$ theory to construct a function with domain $\omega_1$ (the set of all countable ordinals) that maps each countable ordinal $\alpha$ to a bijection between $\alpha$ and $\...
cnikbesku's user avatar
  • 555
0 votes
1 answer
32 views

Reordering a Sequence of Sets Whose Union is the Whole Set

I have a set $ B $ that can be written as $ B = \cup_{\nu < \lambda} B_{\nu} $ where $ \kappa $ is the cardinality of $ B $, that is uncountable, and $ \vert B_{\nu} \vert < \kappa $ with $ \...
nomeaning's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
166 views

Ordinal embedding in $\mathbb{R}$, and the use of $\mathsf{AC}$

Prove that if an ordinal $\alpha$ can be embedded (in an order preserving manner) into $\Bbb{R}$, then $\alpha$ is countable. I managed to prove this using $\mathsf{AC}$ (countable choice is ...
Roy Sht's user avatar
  • 1,371
2 votes
1 answer
111 views

Infinite Lexicographic Order on Bijections is Well-Order

Problem. Prove, without using $\mathsf{AC}$ if possible , that if $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are ordinals such that $\alpha$ is countable and $\beta>1$, then $\alpha^\beta$ is countable. The induction ...
Roy Sht's user avatar
  • 1,371
2 votes
1 answer
102 views

Finding a winning strategy for a game in ZF + “$\omega_1$ is regular”.

Say two players ($A$ and $B$) are playing a game of length $\omega$ on $\omega_1$ in which they play a countable ordinal turn by turn (starting with $A$) and form a sequence of countable ordinals, $(...
Tan's user avatar
  • 1,316
2 votes
1 answer
152 views

Use of the axiom of choice in a first course in ordinals

(It's likely that this entire question is answered with a "yes, you're right" comment. I'm just proceeding with extreme caution after discovering an error in my notes.) I was reading my ...
Patrick Stevens's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
180 views

Why does global choice imply a bijection between all proper classes?

According to this old answer, global choice implies its own version of the well-ordering theorem. Namely that Every proper class can be put in bijection with the class of ordinals. There are two ...
tox123's user avatar
  • 1,602
0 votes
1 answer
40 views

Finding surjections from some subsets of $\omega^2$ to $\omega$ many at most countable ordinals without choice.

Set $A_k = \{\gamma \ | \ \omega \cdot k \leq \gamma < \omega \cdot (k+1) \}$, and let $B$ be a set of ordinals such that $B = \{ \alpha_n \ | \ n \in \omega \}$ where each $\alpha_n$ is an at ...
Tan's user avatar
  • 1,316
1 vote
1 answer
135 views

In $\mathsf{ZF}$, for each set $A$ exists an ordinal $\alpha$ such that no surjection $A\to \alpha$ exists

Some observations. The statement can easily be proven in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, but we do not assume that $\mathsf{AC}$ holds. If one proves that $S=\{\beta \mid \text{there is a surjection $A\to \beta$}...
Zuy's user avatar
  • 4,743
1 vote
0 answers
28 views

Is this proposition regarding equipotence true, without the needing axiom of choice? [duplicate]

Proposition: let $A$ and $B$ be arbitrary sets. Then, there exists a set $C$ such that $A\cap C=\varnothing$ and $C\sim B$. This proposition seems really easy at first, but when I tried to prove it, ...
Bryan Castro's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
72 views

Can $\omega_2$ be the order type of a countable union of countable sets of ordinals?

Working in ZF(wihtout choice), according to this answer: $\omega_2$ is not the countable union of countable sets. Can $\omega_2$ be the order type of a countable union of countable sets of ordinals?
Zuhair's user avatar
  • 4,631
0 votes
0 answers
30 views

Can ZF prove the cartesian product of an ordinal by itself to be subnumerous to that ordinal? [duplicate]

Does ZF (without choice) prove the following? $\forall \ ordinal \ \alpha \ \exists f( f:\alpha \times \alpha \hookrightarrow \alpha)$ where: $ \alpha\times \alpha $ is the cartesian product of $\...
Zuhair's user avatar
  • 4,631
1 vote
1 answer
141 views

How does $\mathsf{ZF}$ prove the countability of ordinals coming out of functions such as the ordinal collapse function?

I am reading about fast growing hierarchies and the ordinal functions that are used in the indices, which allow us to categorise fast growing functions by selecting fundamental sequences for these ...
Sonk's user avatar
  • 509

15 30 50 per page