11

I'm a Turkish national. I currently reside in Germany and I have a type D visa as well as a residence card, both issued by Germany. I was in Oslo, and to go back to Turkiye I could only afford a transit flight through the UK (London). I checked Timatic Web and the requirements for my profile were:

Transiting without a visa is possible for:

Nationals of Turkiye transiting through London (LHR) or Manchester (MAN) with a confirmed onward ticket for a flight to a third country on the same calendar day. They must:

  • have a "D" visa issued by Germany, and
  • stay in the international transit area of the airport, and
  • have documents required for the next destination.

I'm sure that I had all those required documents. But I was denied boarding by Norwegian Air Shuttle on the basis that the flight only lands in a gate that does not connect to the international area of the airport.

Is this a legitimate basis for being denying boarding? If so, do I have the right to make any claims for refunds? And if I was wrongfully denied boarding for this flight, how can I reclaim my rights under the EU's 261?

New contributor
Room Temperature Milk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
9
  • 4
    I’m struggling to see why you think you might have been wrongfully denied boarding. The flight lands at a gate that would mean you could not stay airside to make your connection. Was the transit a self-transfer? Is your complaint that you were not made aware the gate restriction would or might be the case when you booked?
    – Traveller
    Commented Jul 5 at 17:41
  • 9
    Welcome to Travel.SE. For completeness, please can you confirm which London airport were you planning to change flights and which airline were you due to fly between London and Türkiye?
    – B.Liu
    Commented Jul 5 at 17:43
  • 14
    Further to @B.Liu's point: Norwegian does not currently fly to Heathrow (LHR), only to Gatwick (LGW). If you were transferring through Gatwick, the above clause from Timatic doesn't apply. Commented Jul 5 at 19:41
  • 12
    To continute @MichaelSeifert's comment: Gatwick airport doesn't have a secure transit facility. To fly into Gatwick, every passenger must pass UK Immigration and be admitted into the UK. A passenger who is not eligible for admission into the UK will be denied boarding, even if holding a paid-for ticket on that flight. Commented Jul 5 at 20:22
  • 17
    Whether the traveler could transit airside seems to be irrelevant. A Turkish citizen holding either a valid D visa or residence permit issued by an EEA state (e.g. Germany) meets to requirements to enter the UK under landside transit without visa rules. So, the traveller would have been able to enter the UK as long as their onward flight was scheduled to depart by the next day. The rules are available here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65ce4119e1bdec0011322213/…
    – JohnDoe
    Commented 2 days ago

2 Answers 2

36

According to their website, the only airport in the London region that Norwegian Air Shuttle fly to is London-Gatwick (LGW), so presumably that was the airport you were flying through.

Unlike London Heathrow, London Gatwick does not have an "international transit area" - instead all arriving passengers must pass through immigration, even if they are connecting to another international flight. Doing this would require legal authority to enter the UK, which you did not have - thus you were correctly denied taking this flight.

The text you've quoted from Timatic specifically states that it covers "London (LHR) or Manchester (MAN)", however you were not travelling through either of these airports, so this text is not relevant.

If you had been flying a different airline, and had been travelling via London Heathrow, then you would have been able to travel (presuming that connection allowed you to stay airside - most, but not all, do).

So yes, you were correctly denied boarding, and as a result have no recourse under EU261 or any other means - having the correct visas/etc is always the responsibility of the passenger, and you didn't have what was required for this itinerary.

10
  • 3
    Maybe that's why the flight was cheaper.
    – DonQuiKong
    Commented 2 days ago
  • 1
    And since Norwegian does not fly from London to Istanbul, he quite surely did not have a through ticket for the onward flight. Norwegian would likely (also in that case rightfully) denied boarding even if international transfer had been possible in Gatwick, since the two flights were on separate tickets. Commented 2 days ago
  • 9
    The UK Home Office page cited by @JohnDoe in his comment to the original question contains language that provides an exemption from the visa requirement for those who hold a valid D-visa, such as the OP. Do you think this UK page is inapplicable to the OP? Commented 2 days ago
  • 5
    @André: The OP writes "the UK (London)". The bit about "London (LHR) or Manchester (MAN)" is in a quotation from Timatic -- not the OP's own wording. The OP apparently thought that (s)he was covered by the "London (LHR)" wording, but according to this answer, (s)he was mistaken about that. (Probably the OP simply didn't realize that "London (LHR)" refers to just one of the several airports serving London, and that his/her own flight was through a different one.)
    – ruakh
    Commented 16 hours ago
  • 8
    @André They never mentioned which airport they were flying to at all. They do mention the airline and destination city, and the only airport that airline flies to in that city is LGW. The airline doesn’t fly to the airport the Timatic extract quoted relates to, making it irrelevant to the itinerary. The whole point is that the question is based on a false premise. Commented 10 hours ago
5

Whether the traveler could transit airside seems to be irrelevant. A Turkish citizen holding either a valid D visa or residence permit issued by an EEA state (e.g. Germany) meets to requirements to enter the UK under landside transit without visa rules. So, the traveller would have been able to enter the UK as long as their onward flight was scheduled to depart by the next day. The rules are available here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65ce4119e1bdec0011322213/UK+Visa+requirements+February+2024.pdf

A query on Traveldoc also confirms this:

Direct Airside Transit Visa (DATV) is not required for passengers holding a valid Common Resident Format Residence Permit issued by a European Economic Area member state or Switzerland, when transiting Gatwick Airport (LGW), London Heathrow Airport (LHR) or Manchester Airport (MAN) and the passenger's next destination is not Ireland. Passenger must hold an onward flight, correct documentation for their destination and depart the same calendar day. E-visas or e-residence permits are not acceptable unless the airline is able to verify it with the issuing country.

Visa is required for passengers who leave the international transit area of the airport to transit land-side, or otherwise have to pass through border control.

This does not apply to passengers holding a confirmed onward ticket to depart the United Kingdom by air before the end of the next calendar day, and one of the following exemption documents (electronic visas or residence permits are not accepted) provided complying with any conditions specified:
[...]

  • Valid category "D" visa or common format residence permit issued by a European Economic Area member state or Switzerland;

I do not know the exact procedures for claiming compensation in this case for you. Maybe someone else can shine light on this.

1
  • It's interesting to note that while Traveldoc is aware of this, bizarrely Timatic doesn't seem to be, they only have a very small subset of the airside and landside exemptions, as far as I can see.
    – jcaron
    Commented 7 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .