Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
84 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://data.stackexchange.com/ with https://data.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 7, 2020 at 1:20 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 7, 2020 at 5:02 | |||||
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 7, 2019 at 20:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 7, 2019 at 21:03 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2019 at 19:19 | answer | added | GhostCat | timeline score: 13 | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 8:16 | answer | added | Sklivvz | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 7:31 | answer | added | Sklivvz | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 7:28 | answer | added | Sklivvz | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 7:26 | answer | added | Sklivvz | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 9, 2019 at 23:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 10, 2019 at 1:18 | |||||
| Feb 17, 2019 at 18:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 17, 2019 at 19:13 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2019 at 23:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 27, 2019 at 23:56 | |||||
| S Jan 7, 2019 at 4:41 | history | bounty ended | Emperor Palpatine | ||
| S Jan 7, 2019 at 4:41 | history | notice removed | Emperor Palpatine | ||
| S Jan 5, 2019 at 1:32 | history | bounty started | Emperor Palpatine | ||
| S Jan 5, 2019 at 1:32 | history | notice added | Emperor Palpatine | Reward existing answer | |
| Jan 4, 2019 at 4:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 4, 2019 at 5:37 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2018 at 20:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 16, 2018 at 20:17 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2018 at 0:45 | answer | added | Picachieu | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 12, 2018 at 3:38 | answer | added | Picachieu | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 18:59 | answer | added | user | timeline score: 18 | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 2, 2016 at 4:32 | comment | added | Chris | @JonEricson can I get a ruling on this one, either way? Seems to have support: meta.stackexchange.com/a/258814/163135 | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 20:32 | answer | added | wythagoras | timeline score: 18 | |
| Jan 11, 2016 at 22:07 | answer | added | noob | timeline score: -4 | |
| Jan 11, 2016 at 21:46 | answer | added | dauphic | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 7, 2016 at 23:35 | answer | added | Pollyanna | timeline score: 29 | |
| Jan 1, 2016 at 13:51 | answer | added | wythagoras | timeline score: 38 | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 20:24 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Any chance of a "winter holiday of your choice" gift of a "status-planned" on the top-voted not-yet-completed proposal? (Will Jon even see this comment, given that hat? :-) ) | |
| Dec 15, 2015 at 19:25 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 22 | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 20:11 | answer | added | Nathaniel is protesting | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 19:19 | answer | added | keshlam | timeline score: -11 | |
| Oct 23, 2015 at 20:36 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | @JonEricson thank you for saying why you chose what you chose for everything! :) | |
| Oct 23, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | @Won't: Thanks for the prodding. I've been tracking these for when I have bandwidth to do something about them. SInce it's been, what, half a year since I suggested this, it's waaaaay past time to provide my feedback. So I've started to leave edits below. | |
| Oct 20, 2015 at 13:11 | comment | added | user1228 | There's some pretty good stuff in here. Could we get an update with some movement on any of them? (I mean the ones not marked as status-completed) | |
| Oct 19, 2015 at 20:08 | answer | added | user160606 | timeline score: 51 | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 23:06 | answer | added | keshlam | timeline score: -8 | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 18:48 | answer | added | feetwet | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 17:37 | answer | added | wythagoras | timeline score: 19 | |
| Sep 8, 2015 at 16:25 | answer | added | wythagoras | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 0:49 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 23 | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 17:13 | answer | added | durron597 | timeline score: 23 | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 15:00 | answer | added | Kate Gregory | timeline score: 30 | |
| Jun 21, 2015 at 18:58 | answer | added | Makoto | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jun 19, 2015 at 16:26 | answer | added | John Saunders | timeline score: 35 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 23:09 | answer | added | X-27 is done with the network | timeline score: 31 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 15:13 | answer | added | hatchet - done with SOverflow | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 14:07 | answer | added | Ian Ringrose | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 9:18 | comment | added | Raphael | I agree with the top comment on that other question you link: please stay away from moderation features. (In fact, it may be useful to overhaul the moderation privileges so that they depend on useful moderation activity instead of content provided.) | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 22:21 | answer | added | Chris | timeline score: 109 | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 21:41 | answer | added | ChrisW | timeline score: 41 | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 20:47 | answer | added | ChrisW | timeline score: 22 | |
| May 2, 2015 at 5:10 | answer | added | Awesome Poodles | timeline score: 15 | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 14:12 | comment | added | Christian Rau | Uh, I've read that question two times now but still have a hard time seeing the difference to your previous 30k privilege question. What is it you're actually looking for, privileges that shouldn't just apply to 30kers but also lower ones? Or prvileges that should be somehow smaller than the ones presented previously? Does this mean the previous 30k privilege question has failed somehow and is now considered obsolete? Sorry if those are stupid questions, but I try to understand what the purpose of this question actually is, already knowing what tapas are didn't really help me here. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 12:42 | answer | added | Ernest Friedman-Hill | timeline score: -2 | |
| Apr 27, 2015 at 15:19 | answer | added | user259867 | timeline score: 37 | |
| Apr 19, 2015 at 15:06 | comment | added | Arjan | (Sorry, Jon, that "Eric" should read Jon in my off-topic comment above...) | |
| Apr 19, 2015 at 10:45 | comment | added | Arjan | @Najib, if I thought it answered the question, I'd have posted it as an answer, and left out the smiley... That said, handcrafting foot notes is not a good solution, I feel, so whenever a Stack Exchange employee does that, I like to point that out to them. Eric, remember your "it's still a pain and the results aren't ideal"? Use your powers! ;-) | |
| Apr 18, 2015 at 18:36 | answer | added | user259867 | timeline score: 15 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 17:10 | comment | added | user262767 |
@Arjan You can make hand-crafted footnotes with <sup></sup> and ---. And I don't really see why such an ability would be restricted to high rep users...
|
|
| Apr 17, 2015 at 12:10 | comment | added | Arjan | Allow 30k to use footnotes ;-) | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | Online User | @copy, it wouldn't be appropriate to share millions of dollars of revenue with contributing users not making any income. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 8:07 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 7:20 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft | timeline score: 49 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 6:02 | answer | added | Werner | timeline score: -7 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 3:57 | answer | added | Monica Cellio | timeline score: 156 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 2:46 | answer | added | Monica Cellio | timeline score: 27 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 2:36 | answer | added | Monica Cellio | timeline score: 98 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 2:15 | answer | added | Doorknob | timeline score: 57 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 2:05 | answer | added | user158781 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 1:03 | comment | added | Shog9 | As a glutton, I resent tapas. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:32 | answer | added | mhlester | timeline score: 55 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:26 | comment | added | corsair992 | I think it's a bad idea to bind useful and harmless features to only a subset of users. The 1k reputation requirement for observing vote counts is extremely annoying on sites where I am not registered or don't have sufficient reputation. Is there any reason why the site analytics should not be a completely public feature? | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:23 | answer | added | Doorknob | timeline score: 159 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:20 | comment | added | Joe Z. | @JonEricson I would support 6,000 reputation being the threshold for analytics on beta sites. It's consistent with being 1.5 times the "trusted user" level. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:11 | answer | added | CRABOLO | timeline score: -8 | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:02 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | @HDE226868: Maybe. The analytics view makes a lot of sense for beta sites, for instance. But we'd probably want to keep the reputation levels constant for more cosmetic items. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:53 | answer | added | user259867 | timeline score: 69 | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:51 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | Question: On beta sites, when would users unlock these privileges? | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:48 | answer | added | Taryn | timeline score: 87 | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:21 | comment | added | Mysticial | Just to nitpick on your last paragraph, I don't believe moderator privileges should be a burden. If high-rep users want to continue providing great content and nothing else, let them do it. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:18 | comment | added | copy | Share some ad revenue | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:17 | answer | added | Madara's Ghost | timeline score: 120 | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:04 | history | asked | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |