Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2018 at 0:28 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
(While we are at it.) - yes, I did not bump it (that was by a new answer)! Removed meta information (this belongs in comments).
|
| Dec 7, 2018 at 20:09 | history | edited | user | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 834 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2018 at 20:03 | comment | added | user | @JonEricson There is already a mechanism for proposed edit ban on a per-site basis, and as I recall, one big trigger for that is if a user has proposed edits rejected in community review. If the edits are not constructive, they will hopefully be rejected in community review, which could (should) trigger that mechanism. Maybe users using this privilege could have a reduced threshold for when the proposed edit ban kicks in? Maybe they could have only a single outstanding edit at any one time, instead of the half-dozen-ish it is now for proposed edits? Both seem reasonable to me at a glance. | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 19:50 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | Some sites are sensitive to "outside" users making a lot of edits. How would you propose addressing that concern? | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 18:59 | history | answered | user | CC BY-SA 4.0 |