Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 24, 2015 at 11:46 | history | edited | wythagoras | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Dec 9, 2015 at 16:59 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | @ChristianRau: Correct. Though, if you were quick, you could have searched other people's posts. That hole has been patched. | |
| Dec 9, 2015 at 16:57 | comment | added | Christian Rau |
@JonEricson As to the status-completed, am I right that it is only half-way completed, since it only shows your own deleted things or have I misinterpreted that linked meta answer?
|
|
| Dec 9, 2015 at 16:54 | history | edited | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Done. Yay!
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 18:36 | history | edited | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Thanks for the suggestion. No promises on the timeline, but I'm going to circulate this with the team soon.
|
| Apr 22, 2015 at 23:12 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | Wouldn't this make sense as an addition to the 10k level which includes the ability to view (and vote to undelete) posts? | |
| Apr 19, 2015 at 1:12 | comment | added | user259867 | This is a three-course dinner, not a tapa. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 13:24 | comment | added | TZHX | Do you intend this to also allow for the search of other user's deleted posts? It seems you're taking @bluefeet's suggestion and adding a whole lot more power to it (not that it's ever likely to affect me). | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | user262767 | I still haven't read a single convincing argument for why this should be accessible to everyone. What exactly would you do with that information? (Besides, this looks like a huge privilege, not really in the spirit of this thread.) | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 | comment | added | Scimonster | Basically my request for 30k users? | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:38 | comment | added | Taryn | Had to show me up, huh? | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:35 | comment | added | Doorknob |
@JoeZ. You can manually send the GET request (through XMLHttpRequest or $.get in your browser console), and there's no server-side check to see if you really have 1k rep. (There's also a convenience script on Stack Apps, which I won't link here but can easily be found via a simple search.)
|
|
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:27 | comment | added | Joe Z. | "(Similarly to how it's really possible to view split vote counts before earning the privilege, but simply not advertising this is sufficient to prevent excess load on the server.)" Wait, really? How? | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:23 | history | answered | Doorknob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |