Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://data.stackexchange.com/ with https://data.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 15, 2015 at 19:13 | comment | added | corsair992 | @JonasCz: Thanks, I was aware of the script, and already have the Chrome extension installed. | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 19:12 | comment | added | Jonas Czech | @corsair992, there is a Greasemonkey script which lets you see vote counts no matter what your rep is. See stackapps.com/questions/3082/view-vote-totals-without-1000-rep | |
| S Sep 8, 2015 at 17:54 | history | suggested | wythagoras | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a bit more detail on status-completed.
|
| Sep 8, 2015 at 16:13 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 8, 2015 at 17:54 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2015 at 17:50 | history | edited | Werner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added tag.
|
| Jun 17, 2015 at 3:08 | comment | added | Jeffrey Bosboom | I think it's a bit silly to have official statistics for high-rep users and (inevitable) meta posts linking to analogous SEDE queries for the rabble. Being transparent even to low-rep users will help address charges of elitism and may get curious users interested in community moderation. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 11:32 | comment | added | Madara's Ghost | @PythonMaster I'm guessing Jon didn't want to post it himself to prevent it from having an unfair FGITW advantage? Regardless, I've asked him in chat before posting, and he said it was fine by him. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 5:49 | comment | added | Jeremy | @Braiam Jeff Atwood made a lot of excuses like that, many of which were unfounded. I trust that Stack Exchange's engineers could make it work without much difficulty, if they wanted to, but now it's a thing the way it is. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 3:41 | comment | added | corsair992 | @Braiam: Then the system is badly implemented, and should have been optimized to retain this data along with the aggregated total. A badly optimized system should inspire optimization, not patching. | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 3:26 | comment | added | Braiam | @corsair992 if I recall correctly, the privilege was put in place because it costs too much on server side, and most (like ~50%) of users are under 1k. You wouldn't give metal pipes to monkeys around your car, will you? | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:45 | comment | added | corsair992 | As I commented on the main post: "I think it's a bad idea to bind useful and harmless features to only a subset of users. The 1k reputation requirement for observing vote counts is extremely annoying on sites where I am not registered or don't have sufficient reputation. Is there any reason why the site analytics should not be a completely public feature?" | |
| Apr 17, 2015 at 0:19 | comment | added | Anthony Pham | Shouldn't the OP answer with that himself? | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:18 | comment | added | Mysticial | Yes! Very often I come across something with a lot of traffic and I'm unable to find where it is coming from. Sometimes it's obvious if it's on Reddit or HN, but most of the time, I'm left guessing. | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 23:17 | history | answered | Madara's Ghost | CC BY-SA 3.0 |