Timeline for Help us identify micro-privileges for top users
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Jan 2, 2019 at 21:17 | history | suggested | Picachieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
10k tools have voting to delete questions, not answers
|
| Jan 2, 2019 at 20:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 2, 2019 at 21:17 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2016 at 11:26 | history | edited | wythagoras | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2016 at 14:54 | comment | added | yo' | +1. I have never understood why protecting is 15k, and not 10k or 20k. It IMHO does not make any difference, and I agree, protection is a technical thing, almost as technical as the ability to see deleted answers. | |
| Aug 7, 2015 at 18:31 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | Filling in some of the more disappointing privileges seems like a good idea. I'm proposing a mentoring system that could, potentially, open up at 15k. A few of the ideas here (and on my 30k question) seem like natural complements to existing privileges. I'm going to see if we can augment some of the middle levels as we add new levels. | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 1:06 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | I agree with the sentiment. Many of the answers here are privileges I consider substantial -- curating selections to show off as my best work, having better access to content (see deletions, search comments), and some others are things that I would be quite happy to get -- way happier than "protect questions". | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 0:49 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |