Skip to main content

Questions tagged [axiom-of-choice]

The axiom of choice is a common set-theoretic axiom with many equivalents and consequences. This tag is for questions on where we use it in certain proofs, and how things would work without the assumption of this axiom. Use this tag in tandem with (set-theory).

6 votes
1 answer
190 views

Why is homological algebra nonconstructive?

In the Introduction to Weibel's homological algebra book, he states that homological algebra gives nonconstructive results. He doesn't elaborate on this further, so I wanted to know where exactly the ...
Hyunbok Wi's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
50 views

Prove The class Recset of recursive sets is the same as the class of all sets.

This is from spring18 mcs.pdf. recursive set definition Definition 8.3.1. The class of recursive sets Recset is defined as follows: Base case: The empty set $\varnothing$ is a Recset. Constructor ...
An5Drama's user avatar
  • 416
0 votes
2 answers
74 views

Implied proof of axiom of choice

As I understand it the axiom of choice is: For any set (A) a collection of non empty disjoint sets there exists (at least one set) that contains (exactly) one element of each of those sets. If we let ...
Howard Cary Morris's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
297 views

How to construct a nonzero real number between two given nonzero real numbers?

Statement: Let $$X=$$ $$\{(a,b) \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} \times \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}:a<b\}$$ There exists a function $f:X \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}$ such that for all $(a,b) ...
Mohammad tahmasbi zade's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
93 views

How does this proof that for every infinite set $A$ there exists an injection $f : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow A$ rely on the axiom of choice?

I'm currently taking a course in proof-writing, and the following question came up on a problem set: Prove that for every infinite set $A$, there is a one-to-one function $f : \mathbb{N} \rightarrow A$...
Wabberjockey's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
120 views

What is the most general form of the distributive law for $\cup$ and $\cap$?

The following forms of one of the distributive laws increase in generality as we move down the list: \begin{align} (A\cup B)\cap C &= (A\cap C)\cup(B\cap C)\\\\ &\,\Uparrow\\\\ (\bigcup_{a\in ...
John's user avatar
  • 4,432
1 vote
0 answers
66 views

Can the separability of a space depend on the axiom of choice?

Does there exist a topological space $X$ such that in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, $X$ is separable, but such that it is consistent with $\mathsf{ZF}$ that $X$ is not separable? The motivation behind this question ...
Smiley1000's user avatar
  • 1,649
5 votes
2 answers
125 views

No 3 vectors independent over $\mathbb{Z}$ in $\mathbb{Z}^2$, without AoC

Q: Are there three $\mathbb{Z}^2$ vectors independent over $\mathbb{Z}$ ? Context: This problem arise naturally when I'm characterizing possible sub-"latice" in $\mathbb{Z}^2$. Formally let ...
Lab's user avatar
  • 635
1 vote
1 answer
61 views

How Can I Finish off this Proof on Axiom of Choice?

Question Prove that the following is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice: Every surjective map has a right inverse. Attempt I already showed that if the Axiom of Choice holds, then every surjective map ...
Mr Prof's user avatar
  • 451
3 votes
1 answer
102 views

Can a subset of $\mathbb R$ of size $\aleph_1$ be explicitly constructed?

The Continuum Hypothesis claims that $|\mathbb R|=\aleph_1$. This has already been proven unprovable within ZFC. However, we can prove within ZFC that $|\mathbb R|\ge\aleph_1$ and thus there exists $S\...
Alma Arjuna's user avatar
  • 3,881
0 votes
1 answer
87 views

Is there a way to construct larger cardinals without choice axiom?

From Cantor's Theorem, we know that $|\mathcal{P}(X)| > |X|$. So, we can define inductively a set with cardinality $\aleph_n, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}$. Let $\lbrace A_i\rbrace_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ ...
Edwin's user avatar
  • 31
4 votes
1 answer
93 views

The negation of countable choice for reals is consistent

Full disclosure (in order to forestall indignation): I'm going to be using this result in my upcoming paper (I have a statement which I show to be equivalent to $\neg CC(\mathbb R)$ and which I want ...
Cloudscape's user avatar
  • 5,146
10 votes
1 answer
196 views

Equal number of finite and infinite subsets implies amorphous

We work in $\sf ZF$. An amorphous set is a set that cannot be partitioned into $2$ disjoint infinite sets. If $A$ is an amorphous set then it has an equal number of finite subsets and infinite subsets,...
Ynir Paz's user avatar
  • 607
17 votes
2 answers
402 views

Combinatorial proof, without axiom of choice, that for any set $A$, there is no surjection from $A^2$ to $3^A$

The well known proof of Cantor's theorem (stating that $A<2^A$ for any set $A$) does not make any use of the axiom of choice. I have now spent some time wondering if the analogous result $A^2<3^...
Tim Seifert's user avatar
  • 2,243
0 votes
1 answer
78 views

How to prove consistency with choice for large cardinal extensions?

How can we know if an extension of $\sf ZF$ by some large cardinal property that results in a consistency strength beyond $0^{\#}$ is compatible with choice or not? I mean the easiest way to know if ...
Zuhair's user avatar
  • 4,631

15 30 50 per page