Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
49 views

Point-separating fields of clopen sets on compact spaces without Choice

In Matthew Dirk's Paper on Stone's representation theorem there is a proof of Lemma 3.8. If X is a Stone space and F is a separating field of clopen subsets of X, then F is the dual algebra of X; that ...
Daniel Weichhart's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
97 views

Where do I use finiteness in this proof of: In ZF, the compactness theorem implies the Axiom of Choice for collections of finite sets?

Work in ZF, and assume the compactness theorem. Let $\mathsf{AC}^\text{fin}$ be the sentence "every collection of finite non-empty sets has a choice function". UPDATE: Thank you to the ...
dingo's user avatar
  • 43
1 vote
1 answer
111 views

If $Y$ is a regular, then $\delta(X,Y)$ with compact-open topology is regular

Suppose $Y$ is regular. Let $f^*$ be point in $δ(X,Y)$ and $\{f:f(K)∈G\}$ open set such that $f^*∈\{f:f(K)⊆G\}$. Since $f^* (K)⊆G$, and ($Y$ regular) then $∀y∈f^* (K), ∃v_y$ open set such that $y∈v_y⊆(...
gbd's user avatar
  • 2,013
2 votes
1 answer
144 views

Avoid AC in the proof that compact subspaces of a Hausdorff space are closed.

In Munkres Topology Theorem 26.3 there is a proof that a compact subspace of a Hausdorff space is closed. The proof uses the axiom of choice (AC) at some point. Here we can find a proof by ...
Alphie's user avatar
  • 4,827
24 votes
1 answer
502 views

Does Tychonoff's Theorem imply Excluded Middle?

It is well-known that using excluded middle, we can prove that Tychonoff's Theorem implies the axiom of choice. This was proved by Kelley in 1950. However, the standard proof requires excluded middle ...
Mark Saving's user avatar
  • 32.2k
2 votes
1 answer
122 views

Heine's theorem and axiom of choice

I recently read a proof on Wikipedia of Heine's theorem here. I am using their notations. The proof aims at showing that given two metric spaces $M$ and $N$ where $M$ is compact, if $f$ is a ...
Chris's user avatar
  • 143
3 votes
1 answer
251 views

Every compact subset of a CW-complex is contained in a finite subcomplex: does this statement require choice?

In Introduction to Topological Manifolds by J. M. Lee this result proved with a use of an axiom of choice. In my words: If $K$ is a compact subset of CW-complex $(X,\mathcal{E},\varphi)$ in question, ...
Nik Bren's user avatar
  • 1,879
2 votes
1 answer
109 views

How much choice is needed to prove that every compact metric space is a continuous image of the Cantor set?

Having inspected the proof of the fact that for every compact metric space $X$ there exists a continuous surjection from $\{0,1\}^{\mathbb N}$ onto $X$, it looks to me it is a theorem of ZF + DC (...
Tomasz Kania's user avatar
  • 16.5k
2 votes
1 answer
190 views

Separating a point and a compact subset in a Hausdorff space without Choice

Let $K$ be a compact subset of a Hausdorff space $X$, and $x \not \in K$. Then there are disjoint open sets $U,V$ with $K \subseteq U$ and $x \in V$. The proof of this result that I have seen uses ...
revan's user avatar
  • 97
1 vote
0 answers
108 views

compact $\Leftrightarrow$ sequentially compact $\Leftrightarrow$ totally bounded and complete

Let $X$ be a metric space. Assuming the axiom of countable choice, the following are equivalent: $X$ is compact. $X$ is sequentially compact. $X$ is totally bounded and complete. What if we don't ...
Ponta's user avatar
  • 318
6 votes
1 answer
203 views

Is the axiom of choice needed in proving that metric spaces in which every infinite subset has a limit point are compact?

The following proof is based on Rudin's Principles, chapter 2, exercise 26. I wanted to confirm that the axiom of (countable) choice is used in the line in bold, and was curious to know whether this ...
Steven's user avatar
  • 2,306
4 votes
2 answers
223 views

"Indexed" version of compactness and Axiom of Choice

When thinking about some problems related to compactness, I thought of this notion which, at the first glance, seems similar to the usual definition of compactness. A topological space is compact iff ...
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
135 views

Only base in definition of compactness - do we need AC?

This is the usual definition of a compact space: A topological space is compact iff every open cover has a finite subcover. It is possible to consider only covers by sets from a fixed base $\mathcal ...
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
316 views

Prove that Sequentially Compact Metric Spaces are Lindelöf without the Axiom of Choice.

A proof can be found here, but it seems that it uses AC. I would like to know if there is a proof for this fact without AC. I came up with this question after seeing a proof of sequential compactness ...
William Sun's user avatar
  • 2,503
3 votes
1 answer
99 views

Possible use of choice in proving "Compactness implies limit point compactness"

A standard proof can be found here. Basically, the idea is to prove the contrapositive: Let $A\subseteq X$. If $X$ is compact and $A$ doesn't have any limit point, then A is finite. Since A has ...
YuiTo Cheng's user avatar
  • 4,243

15 30 50 per page