Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•578 views
09.11.03 Report to the Dept. of Energy Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee Title: Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC Oak Ridge, TN
Report
Share
Recommended for you
Recommended for you
Recommended for you
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
Similar to Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC (20)
More from Larry Smarr
More from Larry Smarr (20)
Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 1. Project StarGate An End-to-End 10Gbps HPC to User Cyberinfrastructure ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC Report to the Dept. of Energy Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee Oak Ridge, TN November 3, 2009 Dr. Larry Smarr Director, California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology Harry E. Gruber Professor, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering Jacobs School of Engineering, UCSD Twitter: lsmarr
- 2. Project StarGate ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 3. Credits Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (ESnet) Eli Dart San Diego Supercomputer Center Science application Michael Norman Rick Wagner (coordinator) Network Tom Hutton Oak Ridge National Laboratory Susan Hicks National Institute for Computational Sciences Nathaniel Mendoza Argonne National Laboratory Network/Systems Linda Winkler Loren Jan Wilson Visualization Joseph Insley Eric Olsen Mark Hereld Michael Papka [email_address] Larry Smarr (Overall Concept) Brian Dunne (Networking) Joe Keefe (OptIPortal) Kai Doerr, Falko Kuester (CGLX) ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 4. Exploring Cosmology With Supercomputers, Supernetworks, and Supervisualization 4096 3 particle/cell hydrodynamic cosmology simulation NICS Kraken (XT5) 16,384 cores Output 148 TB movie output (0.25 TB/file) 80 TB diagnostic dumps (8 TB/file) Science: Norman, Harkness,Paschos SDSC Visualization: Insley, ANL; Wagner SDSC ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC Intergalactic medium on 2 Glyr scale
- 5. Project StarGate Goals Explore Use of OptIPortals as Petascale Supercomputer “Scalable Workstations” Exploit Dynamic 10 Gbs Circuits on ESnet Connect Hardware Resources at ORNL, ANL, SDSC Show that Data Need Not be Trapped by the Network “Event Horizon” [email_address] Rick Wagner Mike Norman ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 6. Why Supercomputer Centers Shouldn’t Be Data Black Holes or Island Universes Results are the Intellectual Property of the Investigator, Not the Center Where it was Computed Petascale HPC Machines Not Ideal for Analysis/Viz Doesn’t Take Advantage of Local CI Resources on Campuses (e.g., Triton) or at other National Facilities (e.g., ANL Eureka) ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 7. Opening Up 10Gbps Data Path ORNL/NICS to ANL to SDSC Connectivity provided by ESnet Science Data Network End-to-End Coupling of User with DOE/NSF HPC Facilities
- 8. StarGate Network & Hardware ALCF DOE Eureka 100 Dual Quad Core Xeon Servers 200 NVIDIA Quadro FX GPUs in 50 Quadro Plex S4 1U enclosures 3.2 TB RAM SDSC NICS Calit2/SDSC OptIPortal1 20 30” (2560 x 1600 pixel) LCD panels 10 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 graphics cards > 80 gigapixels 10 Gb/s network throughout NSF TeraGrid Kraken Cray XT5 8,256 Compute Nodes 99,072 Compute Cores 129 TB RAM simulation rendering visualization Science Data Network (SDN) > 10 Gb/s fiber optic network Dynamic VLANs configured using OSCARS ESnet ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC Challenge: Kraken is not on ESnet
- 9. StarGate Streaming Rendering ALCF SDSC flPy, a parallel (MPI) tiled image/movie viewer composites the individual movies, and synchronizes the movie playback across the OptIPortal rendering nodes. ESnet Simulation volume is rendered using vl3 , a parallel (MPI) volume renderer utilizing Eureka’s GPUs. The rendering changes views steadily to highlight 3D structure. A media bridge at the border provides secure access to the parallel rendering streams. gs1.intrepid.alcf.anl.gov ALCF Internal 1 The full image is broken into subsets (tiles). The tiles are continuously encoded as a separate movies. 2 3 4 Updated instructions are sent back to the renderer to change views, or load a different dataset. 5 ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 10. Test animation of 1/64 of the data volume (1024 3 region) www.mcs.anl.gov/~insley/ENZO/BAO/B4096/enzo-b4096-1024subregion-test.mov ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 11. Data Moved ORNL to ANL data transfer nodes 577 time steps ~148TB Peak bandwidth ~2.4Gb/s Disk to disk GridFTP, Multiple Simultaneous Transfers, Each with Multiple TCP Connects Average Aggregate Bandwidth <800mb/s, Using Multiple Transfers Additionally Pre-Transfer: Data was Stored in ORNL HPSS, Had to be Staged to Disk on Data Transfer Nodes One Moved to HPSS Partition, Cant Move Data Back Post-Transfer: Each Time Step was a Tar File, Had to Untar Moving Forward, will Need Direct High-Bandwidth Path from Kraken (NICS) to Eureka (ALCF) ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 12. ANL Eureka Graphics Cluster Data Analytics and Visualization Cluster at ALCF (2) Head Nodes, (100) Compute Nodes (2) Nvidia Quadro FX5600 Graphics Cards (2) XEON E5405 2.00 GHz Quad Core Processors 32 GB RAM: (8) 4 Rank, 4GB DIMMS (1) Myricom 10G CX4 NIC (2) 250GB Local Disks; (1) System, (1) Minimal Scratch 32 GFlops per Server ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 13. Visualization Pipeline vl3 – Hardware Accelerated Volume Rendering Library 4096 3 Volume on 65 Nodes of Eureka Enzo Reader can Load from Native HDF5 Format Uniform Grid and AMR, Resampled to Uniform grid Locally Run Interactively on Subset of Data On a Local Workstation, 512 3 Subvolume Batch for Generating Animations on Eureka Working Toward Remote Display and Control ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
- 14. vl3 Rendering Performance on Eureka Image Size: 4096x4096 Number of Samples: 4096 Note Data I/O Bottleneck ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC Data Size Number of Processors/ Graphics Cards Load Time Render/Composite Time 2048 3 17 2min 27sec 9.22 sec 4096 3 129 5min 10sec 4.51 sec 6400 3 (AMR) 129 4min 17sec 13.42sec
- 15. Next Experiments SC09 - Stream a 4Kx2K Movie From ANL Storage Device to OptIPortable on Show Floor Mike Norman is a 2009 INCITE investigator 6 M SU on Jaguar Supersonic MHD Turbulence Simulations for Star Formation Use Similar Data Path for This to Show Replicability Can DOE Make This New Mode Available to Other Users? ANL * Calit2 * LBNL * NICS * ORNL * SDSC
Editor's Notes
- NSF TeraGrid Review January 10, 2006 Charlie Catlett (cec@uchicago.edu) Eureka – the visualization cluster at ALCF Each node has 2 graphics cards 8 processors 32 GB RAM fast interconnect local disk Server FLOPS = 2.0 GHz * 8 cores * 2 flop per clock = 32 GFLOPS
- NSF TeraGrid Review January 10, 2006 Charlie Catlett (cec@uchicago.edu) One of its strengths is its speed, and ability to handle large data sets. Number of procs = power of 2 to do rendering + 1 for compositing 2 graphics cards per node, so half as many nodes as listed here Data i/o is clearly the bottleneck Doing an animation of a single time step, data is only loaded once, can be pretty quick