Skip to main content

Questions tagged [hamiltonian]

The central term in the hamiltonian formalism. Can be interpreted as an energy input, or "true" energy.

3 votes
1 answer
283 views

Time-evolution operator in QFT

I am self studying QFT on the book "A modern introduction to quantum field theory" by Maggiore and I am reading the chapter about the Dyson series (chapter 5.3). It states the following ...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 521
-1 votes
0 answers
38 views

How to get $ H=\int\widetilde{dk} \ \omega a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})a(\mathbf{k})+(\mathcal{E}_0-\Omega_0)V $ in Srednicki 3.30 equation?

We have integration is \begin{align*} H =-\Omega_0V+\frac12\int\widetilde{dk} \ \omega\Big(a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})a(\mathbf{k})+a(\mathbf{k})a^\dagger(\mathbf{k})\Big)\tag{3.26} \end{align*} where \...
liZ's user avatar
  • 31
3 votes
1 answer
140 views

How to get a lower bound of the ground state energy?

The variational principle gives an upper bound of the ground state energy. Thus it is quite easy to get an upper bound for the ground state energy. Every variational wave function will provide one. ...
poisson's user avatar
  • 1,947
0 votes
0 answers
35 views

When is the derivative of Hamilton flow respect to initial conditions independent of time?

Consider a Hamiltonian system with coordinates $\Gamma^A=(q^i,p_i)$ and let $X^A(s,\Gamma_0)$ be the Hamiltonian flow (i.e. a solution to Hamilton's equations) parametrized by time $s$ and initial ...
P. C. Spaniel's user avatar
8 votes
4 answers
1k views

Examples of systems with infinite dimensional Hilbert space, whose energy is bounded from above

We often encounter (and love to!) deal with systems whose energy is bounded from below, for good reasons like stability, etc. But what about systems whose energy is bounded from above? In finite ...
Sanjana's user avatar
  • 785
1 vote
2 answers
49 views

In degenerate perturbation theory why can we assume that matrix elements above and below the degenerate subspace disappear?

The picture shows some original Hamiltonian H which has some degeneracies. Suppose I have some perturbation V to the system and I want to find the new energies and eigenstates of the system. Then from ...
David's user avatar
  • 103
4 votes
1 answer
77 views

Solving for unitary operation using perturbation theory

Let the time-dependent Hamiltonian be \begin{equation} H(t) = H_0(t) + \lambda H_1(t), \end{equation} where $\lambda$ is a small parameter. In the interaction picture (i.e. rotating frame w.r.t ...
Hailey Han's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Mean energy measurement in an arbitrary quantum state

I've gone through many papers looking for a way to measure a mean energy in an arbitrary state $\langle \psi | H | \psi \rangle$. I am interested in a theoretical protocol or an exemplary experimental ...
Pawel's user avatar
  • 1
5 votes
1 answer
282 views

Are "good" states in perturbation theory eigenstates of both the unperturbed and perturbed Hamiltonian?

In my quantum course, my professor asked us the true/false question: "Are 'good' states in degenerate perturbation theory eigenstates of the perturbed Hamiltonian, $H_0 + H'$?" I was ...
nnn's user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

What are the similarities and differences between the Magnus expansion and the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation?

The Magnus expansion and the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation are both methods used to get certain effective Hamiltonians. I know that at a basic level, the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation eliminates ...
NikNack's user avatar
  • 19
2 votes
1 answer
111 views

Derivation of Dirac Hamiltonian

In Minkowski spacetime with signature $(-,\;+,\;+,\;...,\;+)$ the Dirac Lagrangian reads $$ L=\int d^dx\;\mathcal{L}=\int d^dx\;\psi^\dagger\left(i\gamma^0\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-im\gamma^0\right)\psi. ...
TopoLynch's user avatar
  • 495
0 votes
2 answers
87 views

Energy and momentum operators using Hamilton's equations

The energy operator is: $${\displaystyle {\hat {E}}=i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}}\tag1$$ and the momentum operator is $${\displaystyle {\hat {p}}=-i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}}.\...
User198's user avatar
  • 443
0 votes
0 answers
51 views

Why the kinetic term of the Hamiltonian has to be positive definite for well-posed time evolution?

I was going through this paper on QCD chaos, where in Appendix B (page 10), for equation B12: $$\frac{\mathcal{S}}{\mathcal{T}}= \int \mathrm{d}t\sum _{n=0,1} \left(\dot{c}_n^2-c_n^2 \omega _n^2\right)...
codebpr's user avatar
  • 193
0 votes
1 answer
32 views

Eigenstates of the Laplacian and boundary conditions

Consider the following setting. I have a box $\Omega = [0,L]^{d} \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$, for some $L> 0$. In physics, this is usually the case in statistical mechanics or some problems in quantum ...
MathMath's user avatar
  • 1,123
0 votes
0 answers
43 views

Math in Hamiltonian of the hyperquantization of EM field

1. Background: I encounter this when looking into the hyperquantization of EM field. We have the secondly quantized field as below: $$\hat{E}^{(+)}(t)=\mathscr{E} e^{-iwt+i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}}\hat{a}=\...
Hans Funny's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
13