Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
2 answers
203 views

Form of the Hamiltonian at Half-filling

I am trying to understand why chemical potential $= U/2$ is considered to be at half-filling in the case of the Hubbard Model Hamiltonian. So when I substitute this in its Hamiltonian, this is the ...
CuriousMind's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
50 views

Obtaining Eigenvalue Expression

Say we have an excitonic system with a creation operator operator: $$ |\Psi_{ex}\rangle=\sum_{\vec{k}} \phi(\vec{k})c^\dagger_{\vec{k}+\vec{Q}}b_{\vec{k}}|GS\rangle$$ And the Hamiltonian of the system ...
L_J's user avatar
  • 155
2 votes
1 answer
95 views

Is the Hamiltonian for the transverse field Ising model Hermitian?

I'm watching these lectures in Condensed Matter Physics. At Lec. 13, the lecturer introduces the transverse field Ising model with the Hamiltonian $$H = - J \sum_i \sigma_i^x \sigma_{i+1}^x - h \sum_i ...
Níckolas Alves's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
52 views

Sign of momentum doesn't affect Bogoliubov coefficients in Bogoliubov transformation for BEC

I'm running into some issues with the deriving Bogoliubov transformation. Specifically, in order to diagonalize the Hamiltonian $$\begin{align}H = \sum_p \frac{p^2}{2m} \hat a^\dagger_p \hat a_p + \...
Zonova's user avatar
  • 319
3 votes
1 answer
76 views

$\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf p$ Hamiltonian

I am looking into the $k\cdot p$ Hamiltonian approach to describe a semiconductor system. The simplest system appears to be the 2x2 system which can be visualised as: \begin{pmatrix} \epsilon(k) &&...
L_J's user avatar
  • 155
1 vote
0 answers
77 views

Renormalization of two-sublattice tight-binding Hamiltonian

I have a generic tight-binding Hamiltonian of the form $$H=\sum_n A c_n^\dagger d_n+Bd_n^\dagger c_n +C c_{n+1}^\dagger d_n + D d_n^\dagger c_{n+1}$$ where $A,B,C,D$ are parameters (hopping amplitudes)...
LORENTZo_lamas's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
90 views

Effective Hamiltonian for twisted bilayer graphene

I'm trying to follow along with this paper, which reviews the Bistrizer--MacDonald model of twisted bilayer graphene. I'm particular, I'm struggling to derive their Eq. (100). Starting from the ...
CW279's user avatar
  • 349
1 vote
1 answer
80 views

Fourier transform of the Heisenberg antiferromagnetic model

I have a short question about the Fourier transform of the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model. The Hamiltonian, written in terms of bosonic operators, is: $$ \widehat{H} = -NJ\hbar^2s^2 + J\hbar^2s \...
Jochem4T's user avatar
  • 237
2 votes
0 answers
62 views

$\vec{k}\cdot\vec{p}$ Hamiltonian approach

I am new to reading into the $\vec{k}\cdot\vec{p}$ approach. Where for a periodic function $u_{\vec{k}}$, which satisfies the Schrodinger equation: $$ H_\vec{k}u_{\vec{k}}=E_{\vec{k}}u_{\vec{k}} $$ ...
Lb762's user avatar
  • 31
1 vote
1 answer
218 views

Diagonalize a many-body Hamiltonian

Assume we start with a generic many-body Hamiltonian: $$ H=\sum_{ij} t_{ij} a_i^\dagger a_j+\sum_{mnlk}U_{mnkl}a_{m}^{\dagger}a_{n}^{\dagger}a_la_k. $$ Now if there is only the one-body part, which ...
ZhiYu Fan's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
44 views

Non-Hermitian PT-symmetric Interacting Hamiltonian with Real Spectra

The following hamiltonian is $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric $$\mathcal{H} = -J \sum_{j = 1}^{2N} [ 1 + (-1)^j \delta ] [ c^{\dagger}_{j} c_{j+1} + h.c. ] + \imath \gamma \sum_{j = 1}^{2N} (-1)^j c^{\dagger}...
Snpr_Physics's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
81 views

How to evaluate interaction term in Hamiltonian?

If one has an interaction term in the Hamiltonian of a system as follows:$$ \sum_{\vec{q}}V(\vec{q}) \psi(\vec{k}-\vec{q}) $$ where $\psi(\vec{k}-\vec{q})$ and $V(\vec{q})$ is the wave function and ...
L_J's user avatar
  • 155
3 votes
0 answers
55 views

What is the ground state of a Hamiltonian in $k$-space after Bogoliubov transformation? [duplicate]

Consider the following Hamiltonian in $k$-space, quadratic in terms of the $\gamma$ operators: \begin{equation} \hat{H}_2=\frac{1}{2}\sum_k \begin{pmatrix} \gamma_k^\dagger & \gamma_{-...
Humberto Emiliano's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
72 views

Why must a Hamiltonian be gapped to have "local" excitations?

On page 4 of Kitaev's "Anyons in an Exactly Solved Model and Beyond" he states The notion of anyons assumes that the underlying state has an energy gap (at least for topologically ...
DeafIdiotGod's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

Is there any method for folding a Hamiltonian matrix to lower dimension?

I want to solve a tight-binding Hamiltonian which is $6\times6$. I'm only interested in two of the six bands which lie near zero energy at $\vec{k}=(0,\frac{4\pi}{3\sqrt{3}a})$. Is there any way to ...
Ali Rayat's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
8