Skip to main content

All Questions

2 votes
1 answer
115 views

Derivation of Dirac Hamiltonian

In Minkowski spacetime with signature $(-,\;+,\;+,\;...,\;+)$ the Dirac Lagrangian reads $$ L=\int d^dx\;\mathcal{L}=\int d^dx\;\psi^\dagger\left(i\gamma^0\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-im\gamma^0\right)\psi. ...
TopoLynch's user avatar
  • 503
0 votes
0 answers
54 views

Why the kinetic term of the Hamiltonian has to be positive definite for well-posed time evolution?

I was going through this paper on QCD chaos, where in Appendix B (page 10), for equation B12: $$\frac{\mathcal{S}}{\mathcal{T}}= \int \mathrm{d}t\sum _{n=0,1} \left(\dot{c}_n^2-c_n^2 \omega _n^2\right)...
codebpr's user avatar
  • 193
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

If the Lagrangian depends explicitly on time then the Hamiltonian is not conserved?

Why is the Hamiltonian not conserved when the Lagrangian has an explicit time dependence? What I mean is that it is very obvious to argue that if the Lagrangian has no an explicit time dependence $L=L(...
Spectree's user avatar
  • 227
0 votes
3 answers
106 views

Lagrangian equal to Hamiltonian - is it possible?

In one calculation, I got a result where the Hamiltonian equals the Lagrangian, with both values constant. Eventually I found the error and corrected it, but I began to wonder whether there could even ...
pog's user avatar
  • 9
1 vote
0 answers
83 views

Independence of variables in Lagrangain and Hamiltonian mechanics - Rigorous Mathematical approach

I am trying to self-learn the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics and I came across thoughts to which I could not find an answer therefore I would like to try and ask them here. My questions are as ...
Gauss_fan's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
64 views

What would make the Legendre transformation interesting, from the graphical point of view?

The term "transformation" is often used in physics and mathematics for functions to denote a different (and useful) way of encoding the information in a function. In this question, I want to ...
Jbag1212's user avatar
  • 2,599
2 votes
1 answer
861 views

Proof that Hamiltonian is constant if Lagrangian doesn't depend explicitly on time

I know that on solutions of motion we have $\frac{dH}{dt}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial t} $ and i understand the proof for this fact. Then, we have that $$\frac{\partial H}{\partial t}=-\frac{\partial L}...
abc's user avatar
  • 49
0 votes
1 answer
148 views

Why is the hamiltonian density written in terms of $\phi$ and $\pi$ only? [duplicate]

Why is the hamiltonian density defined as: $$\mathcal{H}=\dot{\phi}\pi-\mathcal{L}$$ Where $\pi \equiv \frac{d\mathcal{L}}{d\dot{\phi}}$ and $\mathcal{L}(\dot\phi, \nabla \phi, \phi)$ is a function of ...
Habouz's user avatar
  • 1,324
0 votes
2 answers
42 views

Is there a way to understand which variable is more influential in the dynamics of a system?

Is there any known way to identify which variable has the most impact in the dynamics of a system given its lagrangian or hamiltonian formulation? Let's say i have a system with 3 variables, two ...
francesco pagano's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
202 views

How to find the ground state of a system via its Hamiltonian density?

I am trying to find the ground state of the following Lagrangian (with $\lambda> 0 , g > 0$): $$\tag{1} \mathcal{L}= -\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \sigma + \partial_\mu \pi \partial^\mu ...
GeoPhys's user avatar
  • 23
2 votes
2 answers
215 views

Hamiltonian from Lagrangian defined as an integral

I need to derive the Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian defined in the following way: $$L[x, \dot{x}] = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} f(x(t), t) \sqrt{1 + \dot{x}^2} \mathrm{d}t.\tag{1}$$ The usual method is to ...
lemurman's user avatar
  • 131
7 votes
2 answers
2k views

What is "gradient energy" in classical field theory?

For the simple theory of a single real scalar field $\phi$ in 1+1D, the Lagrange density is $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi-U(\phi)\tag{1}$$ with Minkowski signature $(+,-)$, ...
Superbee's user avatar
  • 661
2 votes
2 answers
156 views

How to derive the fact that $p\sim d/dx$ and $H\sim d/dt$ from classical mechanics?

I am trying to understand Noether's conserved quantities to shifts in time and or position. I have seen the derivation of the operators for Schrodinger's equation but not for classical mechanics. Is ...
nemui's user avatar
  • 381
3 votes
1 answer
324 views

What is the difference between gauge transformation and canonical transformation?

Recently I have been studying theoretical mechanics, then I have this question, Is the gauge transformation the same as the canonical transformation?
a Fish in Dirac Sea's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
209 views

Scalar field Hamiltonian $H = 0$ from parameterization independence

This question is related (but not similar) to this old one of mine: How to derive the two Friedmann-Lemaître equations from a Lagrangian? Consider the Lagrangian of an isotropic-homogeneous ...
Cham's user avatar
  • 7,592

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5