Skip to main content

All Questions

8 votes
4 answers
1k views

Examples of systems with infinite dimensional Hilbert space, whose energy is bounded from above

We often encounter (and love to!) deal with systems whose energy is bounded from below, for good reasons like stability, etc. But what about systems whose energy is bounded from above? In finite ...
Sanjana's user avatar
  • 785
1 vote
2 answers
49 views

In degenerate perturbation theory why can we assume that matrix elements above and below the degenerate subspace disappear?

The picture shows some original Hamiltonian H which has some degeneracies. Suppose I have some perturbation V to the system and I want to find the new energies and eigenstates of the system. Then from ...
David's user avatar
  • 103
5 votes
1 answer
286 views

Are "good" states in perturbation theory eigenstates of both the unperturbed and perturbed Hamiltonian?

In my quantum course, my professor asked us the true/false question: "Are 'good' states in degenerate perturbation theory eigenstates of the perturbed Hamiltonian, $H_0 + H'$?" I was ...
nnn's user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
0 answers
51 views

What are the similarities and differences between the Magnus expansion and the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation?

The Magnus expansion and the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation are both methods used to get certain effective Hamiltonians. I know that at a basic level, the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation eliminates ...
NikNack's user avatar
  • 19
10 votes
3 answers
1k views

Quantum harmonic oscillator meaning

Imagine we want to solve the equations $$ i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left| \Psi \right> = \hat{H}\left| \Psi \right> $$ where $$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial ...
Jorge's user avatar
  • 221
3 votes
2 answers
203 views

Form of the Hamiltonian at Half-filling

I am trying to understand why chemical potential $= U/2$ is considered to be at half-filling in the case of the Hubbard Model Hamiltonian. So when I substitute this in its Hamiltonian, this is the ...
CuriousMind's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
32 views

Time evolution using non-Hermitian (not a PT symmetric) Hamiltonian

I am currently dealing with non-Hermitian hamiltonian and dynamics using it. In general the diagonalizable non-Hermitian matrix might have complex eigenvalues and the eigenvectors may not be ...
user101134's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
82 views

Exercise on self-adjointness of Hamiltonian [closed]

I am struggling with some exercise I have to solve for my quantum mechanics class. PROBLEM: Suppose $|\psi\rangle, |\phi\rangle$ are normalised and linearly independent (but not necessarily ...
Octavius's user avatar
  • 743
0 votes
0 answers
62 views

Wigner's formula for the kinetic energy density in QM

In the Schroedinger equation the kinetic energy is represented by the operator $T = -\frac {\hbar^2} {2m} \Delta$ which acts on a wavefunction $\Psi$. If we multiply this by the complex conjugate of ...
M. Wind's user avatar
  • 743
0 votes
2 answers
113 views

Is the initial state the eigenstate of a Hamiltonian?

Solutions to the Schrödinger equation can take the form $ \psi(r,t)=\psi(r)f(t) $, where $f(t) = e^{\frac{-iEt}{\hbar}}$, $$ H \psi(r) = E \psi(r) ,$$ where $\psi(r)$ is the eigenstate of a ...
ZhuanXu's user avatar
  • 45
1 vote
0 answers
72 views

If $H$ anniliates a state, must $Q$ and $Q^\dagger$ also annihilate the state?

Suppose we have a a Hamiltonian, $H$. And suppose also we have some operator $Q$ such that $\{Q, Q^{\dagger}\} = H$, and $Q^2 = 0$. If we find a state $|\psi \rangle$ such that $Q|\psi \rangle = Q^{\...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
3 votes
2 answers
204 views

Why are these unbounded operators (essentially) self-adjoint?

Can anyone provide exact mathematical reasoning as to why the following fundamental unbounded symmetric operators are essentially self-adjoint? I.e. on, their natural domains, they admit a unique ...
SiOn's user avatar
  • 30
-3 votes
2 answers
107 views

Multi-particle Hamiltonian for the free Klein-Gordon field

The text I am reading (Peskin and Schroeder) gives the Hamiltonian for the free Klein-Gordon field as: $$H=\int {d^3 p\over (2\pi)^3}\; E_p\; a^{\dagger}_{\vec p}a_{\vec p}$$ This does not seem to be ...
Albertus Magnus's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
81 views

Why Fock representation holds only in a free quantum field theory?

With a quantum system with $N$ degrees of freedom, all the representations are unitarily equivalent to Fock representation. However, if the number of degrees of freedom goes to infinity, there are ...
MBlrd's user avatar
  • 159
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Questions of lower boundness of Hamiltonians in quantum theories

In general spectral analysis, we have examples of unbounded from below hamiltonians with discrete spectrum. Is it okay to say that they have no sense in physical context, because for me it looks like ...

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
15