ONLYOFFICE développée par Ascensio System SIA, est une suite bureautique open-source basée sur l'élément Canvas de HTML5, qui offre une gamme complète d’outils d’édition en ligne des documents texte, feuilles de calcul et présentations. Cette présentation commence par l’aperçu des principes de base : - support de tous les formats courants, - riche éventail d’outils de la mise en forme, - affichage du contenu de manière identique, quel que soit le navigateur utilisé, - ressources permettant d’étendre les fonctionnalités des éditeurs, - capacités avancées de co-édition, - transfert de données sécurisé en temps réel. Le nombre des universités et des écoles qui optent pour les alternatives open source aux solutions populaires offertes par les grandes marques, augmente chaque année. Les solutions de ONLYOFFICE sont actuellement utilisées par plus de 30 établissements d’enseignement en France tels que treize Universités de la Sorbonne, l’Université de Grenoble, l’Université de Nantes, l’École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest, le l'établissement public Campus Condorcet, etc. Dans cette partie, Jeremy Maton, l’Administrateur Systèmes et Réseaux à l’Institut de Biologie de Lille, va présenter comment ONLYOFFICE est intégrée au sein de leur unité de recherches et aide à organiser le flux de travail.
This presentation was provided by Fred Reiss of the University of Oklahoma for the NISO webinar, Integrating Library Management Systems, held on June 8, 2016.
The document summarizes announcements from the 2016 NASIG CORAL User Group meeting. It provides information on the steering committee and web committee members and notes their upcoming plans. These include merged repositories, a comprehensive roadmap, governance documents, new collaboration tools, and software updates. It also outlines new features and additions from SirsiDynix, such as fund code creation and import options, resource import updates, and helpful links in the licensing module.
Which application of O365 to use for which type of document? Is SharePoint a real DMS system? what are the pros and cons? Find here the analysis as presented on aOS Brussels, 5/12/2016 @Microsoft Belgium
This document introduces Learning Information Services (LIS) and Course and Program Scheduling (CPS), which are specifications that allow different systems like student information systems and learning management systems to exchange student data like courses, grades, and schedules in a standard way. LIS defines web services that use XML and SOAP to exchange this data. CPS builds on LIS to specifically handle scheduling of courses, classes, rooms, and students. Conformance testing is available to check that systems properly implement the LIS and CPS standards. The standards are overseen by an open governance group that considers updates and issues.
This document discusses the challenges facing academic libraries and trends in academia. It then introduces BLUEcloud as a library services platform that allows libraries to integrate physical and electronic resources through a cloud-based, multi-tenant system with APIs and web services. BLUEcloud provides functionality for discovery, acquisitions, metadata, interlibrary loan, digital archives, and connects libraries to content, library systems, and partners through its open platform approach.
This document discusses document management in Office 365. It provides an overview of where documents are stored in Office 365, including personal documents, records/archives, internal/external sites. It then discusses using SharePoint as a document management system (DMS), highlighting its features like classification, permissions, workflows. It notes attention points for SharePoint DMS like treating documents as files with properties, file name rules. The document also covers archiving, permissions, storage and concludes with notes on using SharePoint as a DMS and limits to consider.
Les slides de ma conférence à l'aOS Luxembourg de mai 2017 sur la gouvernance documentaire dans O365.
A presentation held by Lyubomir Penev in the iDiv Seminar Series at the Biodiversity Informatics Unit of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Leipzig, 15 February 2017.
This document describes a low-tech approach developed by Utah State University to link finding aids to digital content using Archival Resource Keys (ARKs). The approach aims to make the process flexible and accessible to various library staff and student workers without requiring in-depth XML training. It utilizes common office tools like Excel and Word along with XML editors. Dublin Core metadata is used to meet standards for two different consortiums while ARKs serve as persistent identifiers independent of any digital repository system. Step-by-step workflows are documented for applying this approach to born-digital archival materials.
This document describes workflows developed by Utah State University and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas to streamline metadata creation between special collections and digital initiatives departments. The workflows allow for converting finding aid information into Dublin Core for uploading item records to a digital repository, and batch linking digitized content to finding aids. The processes are designed to be taught easily and performed by various staff levels to automate metadata work and make it more flexible.
By Carlos Quiros (ILRI) at the Forum on Open Data and Open Science in Agriculture on 15th June 2015
Which application from O365 offer to use for which usage around document? What are the real SharePoint capabilities as a DMS? Slidedeck used for aOS Bangalore event 06/04/2017
This was delivered as a part of the Global Office 365 Developer Bootcamp at Panjab University in Chandigarh on Nov 3 2018
This document discusses OCLC's WorldCat knowledge base and its Cooperative Management Initiative to improve metadata quality. It notes that the knowledge base contains metadata on electronic resources from over 5,800 providers. Through the Initiative, member libraries can approve/deny provider changes and add/update their own records. While cooperative management has increased transparency and prevented bad data, challenges include inconsistent participation, a lack of change protection, and the need for clearer guidelines. The document calls for balancing provider and community contributions to better leverage crowdsourcing for metadata maintenance.
This document discusses Ontotext GraphDB connectors which allow users to perform complex SPARQL queries over RDF data by leveraging external engines like Elasticsearch, Solr, and Lucene. The connectors provide fast full-text search, faceted search, aggregations, and range queries through selective replication of RDF data to the external engines while synchronizing data and managing the connectors through SPARQL queries and updates. This enables users to get the benefits of SPARQL for graph pattern matching along with the advanced querying capabilities of systems like Elasticsearch without having to use a different query language.