- The document discusses the biomechanics and pathomechanics of the elbow joint. It describes the ligaments of the elbow, the articulations between the humerus, ulna, and radius, and the range of motion of the elbow joint. It also examines the muscles that flex, extend, pronate, and supinate the forearm, discussing their attachments, actions, innervation, and the effects of joint positioning on their function. Key concepts covered include torque, moment arms, classes of levers, and the screw home mechanism of the elbow.
Knee joint anatomy, biomechanics, pathomechanics and assessmentRadhika Chintamani
the knee complex complete anatomy, biomechanics, pathomechanics and its physical assessment in one single slideshow.a brief table given for easy understanding of what special test to be performed in which condition along with evidences of each special test.
small correction in slide number: 10
during flexion of tibia over femur in OKC; tibia glides and rolls posteriorly
during extension of tibia over femur in OKC: tibia glides and rolls anteriorly
This document discusses the pathomechanics of ankle joint injuries. It begins with the anatomy and ligaments of the ankle joint. It then discusses the muscle groups around the ankle joint and their actions. Next, it explores the mechanics of ankle motion and different types of ankle injuries including lateral and medial ligament injuries, fractures, and muscular imbalances. It provides details on specific muscles like the tibialis anterior and their weaknesses or tightnesses. It concludes with discussing chronic ankle instability and recent literature on lateral ankle sprains and reinjury rates. In summary, the document provides an in-depth overview of ankle joint anatomy, mechanics, common injuries and their pathomechanics, as well as muscular factors.
The document discusses postural control and balance, defining it as the ability to control body position in space. It describes static and dynamic postural control, and notes an intervention program should be based on an accurate evaluation. The summary provides exercises to improve postural alignment, control of movement, adaptation to tasks/environments, and fall prevention. A balance training program incorporates steady state, anticipatory and reactive exercises focusing on static and dynamic postural control.
This document discusses biomechanics and activities of daily living. It defines biomechanics as the study of mechanics in the human body. Functional biomechanics looks at the link between the human body and its environment. Biomechanics consists of kinematics, the description of motion, and kinetics, the forces producing motion. Common activities like running, lifting, and walking are analyzed in terms of joint motion and ground reaction forces. Proper form and muscle engagement can reduce stresses, as seen in squat lifting versus stoop lifting.
This document discusses the biomechanics of the knee joint, including its structure, stability mechanisms, and kinetics. It describes the knee as a complex hinge joint made up of the femur, tibia, and patella. Key stabilizing structures include the collateral and cruciate ligaments, menisci, and surrounding muscles. The document outlines the knee's degrees of freedom and range of motion, including screw-home rotation. It also analyzes the forces acting on the knee during activities like walking, cycling, and squatting using free body diagrams and dynamic analysis.
3. biomechanics of Patellofemoral jointSaurab Sharma
The patellofemoral joint is one of the most incongruent joints in the body. It depends on static structures like the lateral lip of the femoral condyle and the length of the patellar tendon for stability. Forces through the joint increase significantly during activities like squatting or ascending stairs. Pathologies of the patellofemoral joint can include osteoarthritis, ligament injuries, meniscal tears, and patellofemoral pain syndrome resulting from an imbalance of forces through the joint.
Brian Mulligan described novel concept of the simultaneous application of therapist applied accessory mobilizations and patient generated active movements
Running requires greater balance, muscle strength, and joint range of movement than walking. There are three phases to the running cycle: stance, swing, and float. During running, the ground reaction force can increase to 250% of body weight. The kinematics of running involve hip flexion at heel strike and extension at toe off, knee flexion during loading and extension before toe off, and ankle dorsiflexion at heel strike and plantarflexion throughout stance phase. Key muscles like gluteus maximus, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius are active at different parts of the running cycle to provide shock absorption, balance, forward propulsion, and control of changes in direction.
The document provides an overview of the Kaltenborn joint mobilization method. It describes how traditional manipulations have changed over time to reduce risk of injury. Kaltenborn introduced using linear translatoric movements instead of rotational forces to further reduce joint compression. The method evaluates joints for hypomobility and uses grades I-III mobilizations within or at the end of the joint's range of motion to restore normal movement and reduce pain. Precise positioning and understanding concave/convex bone movement aids effective and safe treatment.
Biomechanics and pathomechanics of scoliosisRashmitadash3
This document discusses the biomechanics and pathomechanics of scoliosis. Some key points:
- Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine that deviates from the normal vertical line. It can occur in the sagittal, coronal, or axial planes.
- In structural scoliosis, asymmetrical pressure on immature vertebrae causes uneven growth, resulting in wedging and rotation. Soft tissues also shorten on the concave side.
- Several theories try to explain scoliosis progression, like the Hueter-Volkmann law about bone growth and Stoke's vicious cycle theory.
- Types of scoliosis include idiopathic, congenital, neu
A type of manual therapy in which the muscle or the joint is altered and placed in a position of comfort for certain duration after which the pain disappears completely or gets reduced. this slide show explains about the principles, mechanism and Phases of PRT
Concept given by Shacklock (modern concept) and Butler (old concept), a method of assessment as well as treatment of peripheral neurological system by physiotherapists.
Part-I: The current slideshow: theoretical aspect of neurodynamics.
Part-II: Assessment of peripheral nervous system on the basis of neurodynamic concepts: Date: 01/04/2020
Part-III: treatment part: Date: 03/04/2020
Part-IV: Self neurodynamics: 05/04/2020
This document discusses prehension, or gripping, which is made possible by the opposable thumb in humans. It describes two main types of grip: power grip, which involves the whole hand and is used to hold cylindrical or spherical objects, and precision grip, which requires finer motor control and pad-to-pad, tip-to-tip, or pad-to-side contact between the thumb and fingers. Specific grips like hook, spherical, and lateral grips are subtypes of power grip. Precision grips depend on intact sensation and muscles like the flexor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis. The functional position of the wrist and fingers optimizes power and efficiency of grip.
Dr. James Cyriax developed Cyriax techniques in the early 1900s as a systematic approach to soft tissue injuries. The techniques involve selective tissue tension testing to diagnose lesions, followed by treatments like deep friction massage, passive movements, and active exercises. Deep friction massage uses longitudinal or transverse forces to separate tissue fibers and relieve pain. Passive movements can be graded from low-force range-of-motion to high-velocity small-amplitude thrusts. Active exercises prevent immobilization effects and maintain tissue integrity. Together, Cyriax techniques aim to accurately diagnose and beneficially treat soft tissue disorders.
1. The elbow joint includes the humeroradial, humeroulnar, and superior radioulnar joints.
2. Flexion and extension at the elbow occurs around a fixed axis through the trochlea and capitulum.
3. Several ligaments and muscles work together to provide stability and control motion at the elbow and radioulnar joints during activities of daily living.
The document discusses the anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow complex. It describes the bones, joints, ligaments, muscles and range of motion of the elbow. Specifically, it details the articulating surfaces of the humerus, radius and ulna that make up the elbow joint. It explains how the ligaments provide stability and the functions of the main flexor and extensor muscles like the biceps, brachialis and triceps. Finally, it discusses how biomechanical factors like carrying angle and two-joint muscles can impact the elbow's range of motion.
The document discusses the anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow complex. It describes the bones, joints, ligaments, and muscles that make up the elbow. The elbow complex includes the humeroulnar joint, humeroradial joint, and proximal and distal radioulnar joints. It allows flexion/extension of the forearm and pronation/supination from the rotation of the radius. Key muscles like the biceps, brachialis, and triceps act across these joints to enable movement. Common injuries like tennis elbow and supracondylar fractures are also mentioned.
This document discusses the biomechanics of the elbow joint. It describes the bones and joints that make up the elbow complex, including the humeroulnar and humeroradial joints. It details the range of motion, ligaments, muscles, and biomechanics involved in flexion, extension, pronation and supination. Common injuries around the elbow joint like compression injuries, distraction injuries, and varus/valgus injuries are also summarized.
The elbow joint is a hinge joint formed between the humerus, radius, and ulna bones. It allows flexion and extension movements. The elbow joint is stabilized by ligaments including the medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament complex. Muscles such as the biceps brachii and triceps brachii are responsible for flexion and extension, respectively. The radioulnar joints allow pronation and supination movements of the forearm and are stabilized by ligaments like the annular ligament. Mobility of both the elbow and radioulnar joints is important for performing daily activities.
The document discusses the biomechanics of the elbow complex, which includes the elbow joint and proximal and distal radioulnar joints. It describes the bones that make up the elbow joint, including the humerus, ulna, and radius. The elbow functions as a modified hinge joint, allowing flexion and extension in the sagittal plane. The proximal and distal radioulnar joints allow forearm rotation. Ligaments like the ulnar collateral and radial collateral provide joint stability. Common injuries include elbow dislocations and lateral/medial epicondylitis.
The document discusses lower limb biomechanics, including:
1) The knee plays an important role in walking by maintaining the body's center of gravity and providing shock absorption during stance phase.
2) Orthoses that limit knee flexion can result in an abnormal gait pattern due to the significant impact of the knee on walking.
3) Ground reaction forces during activities like walking and squats produce moments at the ankle, knee, and hip joints that must be counteracted by specific muscle groups to maintain stability.
The elbow is a complex joint that allows flexion-extension and pronation-supination movements. It has multiple bony structures that articulate including the distal humerus, ulna, and radius. The elbow is stabilized by ligaments like the medial and lateral collateral ligaments as well as surrounding muscles. During motion, the elbow experiences changing axes of rotation and joint forces that can reach up to 3 times body weight during activities. The biomechanics of the elbow are crucial for understanding normal function and injury mechanisms.
This document discusses the biomechanics of the hip and pelvis. It begins by defining biomechanics and describing the mobility and stability of the hip joint. It then covers the angles of the femoral neck, direction of the acetabulum, and axes of the lower limb. Key biomechanical concepts discussed include levers, forces across the hip joint, and instant centers of rotation. Specific examples analyzed include forces in single leg stance, the effects of a cane, and changes with weight gain or femoral neck deformities. The document concludes by reviewing the biomechanical principles of total hip replacement.
The document provides information on the anatomy, biomechanics, and principles of the hip joint. It describes the hip joint as a ball-and-socket synovial joint with articular cartilage covering the femoral head and acetabulum. Key ligaments that support the hip joint are also outlined. Biomechanics concepts like lever arms, forces, and strategies to reduce joint reaction forces are discussed. The principles of total hip replacement to decrease forces on the implant through acetabular deepening and increasing the abductor lever arm are presented.
The ankle/foot complex allows both stability and mobility through its structures. It bears weight and provides stability through the ankle joint and subtalar joint. The ankle joint permits dorsiflexion and plantarflexion around an oblique axis between the talus and tibia/fibula mortise. Ligaments including the deltoid and collateral ligaments support the joints. The talus wedging in the mortise enhances stability in dorsiflexion. Plantarflexion provides less stability.
This document discusses the biomechanics of the hip joint. It begins by defining biomechanics and describing the mobility and stability of the hip. It then discusses forces acting on the hip like body weight, abductor muscles, and joint reaction forces. It explains how these forces are balanced in different positions like two-leg stance, single-leg stance, and with the use of a cane. The document concludes by discussing implications for conditions like coxa valga and coxa vara, and principles of total hip replacement surgery.
This document discusses the biomechanics of the hip joint. It describes how the hip functions as a lever with the body weight and abductor muscles producing forces on either side of the fulcrum. It explains how the hip is designed to provide both mobility and stability. Key factors like the neck angle, acetabular direction, and forces during activities like standing, walking and running are summarized. The effects of conditions like coxa valga and coxa vara on hip biomechanics are also outlined. Lastly, the biomechanical goals and considerations for total hip replacement surgery are presented.
The document discusses hip joint anatomy and biomechanics from the perspective of total hip arthroplasty. It describes key terms like kinematics and kinetics. It provides details on normal ranges of motion for the hip. It discusses femoral head anatomy and the forces acting on the hip during single leg stance, which can be up to 4 times body weight. Factors like leg length, weight, and abductor lever arm influence joint loading.
This document discusses biomechanical principles of human motion. It covers topics such as kinetics, kinematics, Newton's laws of motion, forces, levers, and stability. Key points include:
- Kinetics deals with forces causing movement, while kinematics involves time, space, and mass aspects of motion.
- Newton's first law states an object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force.
- Torque is the tendency of a force to cause rotation, and is equal to the force magnitude multiplied by the distance from the axis of rotation.
- Stability depends on the relationship between an object's center of gravity and its base of support
1. Biomechanics is the study of forces acting on the living body, including those acting across joints like the hip.
2. The hip is both mobile and stable due to its strong bones, muscles, ligaments and the depth of the acetabulum.
3. Forces acting across the hip joint include body weight, abductor muscle forces, and a joint reaction force that maintains equilibrium. The joint reaction force increases during activities like walking and running that place greater demands on the hip.
This document provides an overview of biomechanics concepts related to the hip joint, including:
- Forces acting on the hip joint include body weight and forces generated by hip abductor muscles. The joint reaction force is the force generated within the joint in response.
- Parameters like femoral head size, neck length, and offset impact joint stability and the required abductor muscle force. Restoring anatomy reduces joint forces.
- Gait adaptations like limping or using a cane bring the body's center of gravity closer to the hip joint, reducing forces on the joint.
The shoulder complex is composed of four joints that link the upper extremity to the thorax. It includes the sternoclavicular joint, acromioclavicular joint, scapulothoracic joint, and glenohumeral joint. The shoulder complex provides a large range of motion but has more laxity than other joints, making it prone to instability and injury without the dynamic stabilization of muscles and ligaments. The glenohumeral joint in particular is a ball-and-socket synovial joint surrounded by a large capsule that relies on reinforcement from ligaments and the rotator cuff muscles.
Similar to elbow biomechanics and Pathomechanics.pptx (20)
Search for Dark Matter Ionization on the Night Side of Jupiter with CassiniSérgio Sacani
We present a new search for dark matter (DM) using planetary atmospheres. We point out that
annihilating DM in planets can produce ionizing radiation, which can lead to excess production of
ionospheric Hþ
3 . We apply this search strategy to the night side of Jupiter near the equator. The night side
has zero solar irradiation, and low latitudes are sufficiently far from ionizing auroras, leading to a lowbackground search. We use Cassini data on ionospheric Hþ
3 emission collected three hours either side of
Jovian midnight, during its flyby in 2000, and set novel constraints on the DM-nucleon scattering cross
section down to about 10−38 cm2. We also highlight that DM atmospheric ionization may be detected in
Jovian exoplanets using future high-precision measurements of planetary spectra.
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
just download it to see!
Probing the northern Kaapvaal craton root with mantle-derived xenocrysts from...James AH Campbell
"Probing the northern Kaapvaal craton root with mantle-derived xenocrysts from the Marsfontein orangeite diatreme, South Africa".
N.S. Ngwenya, S. Tappe, K.A. Smart, D.C. Hezel, J.A.H. Campbell, K.S. Viljoen
A slightly oblate dark matter halo revealed by a retrograde precessing Galact...Sérgio Sacani
The shape of the dark matter (DM) halo is key to understanding the
hierarchical formation of the Galaxy. Despite extensive eforts in recent
decades, however, its shape remains a matter of debate, with suggestions
ranging from strongly oblate to prolate. Here, we present a new constraint
on its present shape by directly measuring the evolution of the Galactic
disk warp with time, as traced by accurate distance estimates and precise
age determinations for about 2,600 classical Cepheids. We show that the
Galactic warp is mildly precessing in a retrograde direction at a rate of
ω = −2.1 ± 0.5 (statistical) ± 0.6 (systematic) km s−1 kpc−1 for the outer disk
over the Galactocentric radius [7.5, 25] kpc, decreasing with radius. This
constrains the shape of the DM halo to be slightly oblate with a fattening
(minor axis to major axis ratio) in the range 0.84 ≤ qΦ ≤ 0.96. Given the
young nature of the disk warp traced by Cepheids (less than 200 Myr), our
approach directly measures the shape of the present-day DM halo. This
measurement, combined with other measurements from older tracers,
could provide vital constraints on the evolution of the DM halo and the
assembly history of the Galaxy.
Hydrogen sulfide and metal-enriched atmosphere for a Jupiter-mass exoplanetSérgio Sacani
We observed two transits of HD 189733b in JWST program 1633 using JWST
NIRCam grism F444W and F322W2 filters on August 25 and 29th 2022. The first
visit with F444W used SUBGRISM64 subarray lasting 7877 integrations with 4
BRIGHT1 groups per integration. Each effective integration is 2.4s for a total effective exposure time of 18780.9s and a total exposure duration of 21504.2s (∼6 hrs)
including overhead. The second visit with F322W2 used SUBGRISM64 subarray
lasting 10437 integrations with 3 BRIGHT1 groups per integration. Each effective
integration is 1.7s for a total effective exposure time of 17774.7s and a total exposure
duration of 21383.1s (∼6 hrs) including overhead. The transit duration of HD189733
b is ∼1.8 hrs and both observations had additional pre-ingress baseline relative to
post-egress baseline in anticipating the potential ramp systematics at the beginning
of the exposure from NIRCam infrared detectors.
Dalghren, Thorne and Stebbins System of Classification of AngiospermsGurjant Singh
The Dahlgren, Thorne, and Stebbins system of classification is a modern method for categorizing angiosperms (flowering plants) based on phylogenetic relationships. Developed by botanists Rolf Dahlgren, Robert Thorne, and G. Ledyard Stebbins, this system emphasizes evolutionary relationships and incorporates extensive morphological and molecular data. It aims to provide a more accurate reflection of the genetic and evolutionary connections among angiosperm families and orders, facilitating a better understanding of plant diversity and evolution. This classification system is a valuable tool for botanists, researchers, and horticulturists in studying and organizing the vast diversity of flowering plants.
Lunar Mobility Drivers and Needs - ArtemisSérgio Sacani
NASA’s new campaign of lunar exploration will see astronauts visiting sites of scientific or strategic
interest across the lunar surface, with a particular focus on the lunar South Pole region.[1] After landing
crew and cargo at these destinations, local mobility around landing sites will be key to movement of
cargo, logistics, science payloads, and more to maximize exploration returns.
NASA’s Moon to Mars Architecture Definition Document (ADD)[2] articulates the work needed to achieve
the agency’s human lunar exploration objectives by decomposing needs into use cases and functions.
Ongoing analysis of lunar exploration needs reveals demands that will drive future concepts and elements.
Recent analysis of integrated surface operations has shown that the transportation of cargo on the
surface from points of delivery to points of use will be particularly important. Exploration systems will
often need to support deployment of cargo in close proximity to other surface infrastructure. This cargo
can range from the crew logistics and consumables described in the 2023 “Lunar Logistics Drivers and
Needs” white paper,[3] to science and technology demonstrations, to large-scale infrastructure that
requires precision relocation.
11. Ligaments of the Elbow
• Medial (ulnar) collateral ligament :
• The medial collateral ligament
complex consists of bundles of
fibers that may be differentiated
into anterior, posterior, and
transverse portions.
• Function :
• Providing medial support to the
elbow against valgus stress.
• Limiting end range elbow
extension.
12. Lateral (radial) collateral ligament :
• The lateral collateral ligament
complex, a fan-shaped ligament on
the lateral surface of the elbow, is
composed of the lateral collateral
ligament, the lateral ulnar collateral
ligament, and the annular ligament.
• Function :
This complex provides stability to the
lateral aspect of the elbow against varus
and supination forces, stabilizes the
humeroradial joint, resists longitudinal
distraction, and prevents posterior
translation of the radial head.
13. Humeroulnar Articulation
Characteristics :
The humeroulnar (HU) articulation is a modified
hinge joint. The primary motions at this
articulation are flexion and extension.
Arthokinematics : During flexion/extension the
concave fossa slides in the same direction in
which the ulna moves, so with elbow flexion, the
fossa slides around the trochlea in an anterior
and distal direction. With elbow extension, the
fossa slides in a posterior and proximal direction.
14. Humeroradial Articulation
• Characteristics : The humeroradial (HR) articulation
is a hinge-pivot joint. The laterally placed, spherical
capitulum at the distal end of the humerus is
convex. The concave boney partner, the head of
the radius, is at the proximal end of the radius.
Flexion/extension and pronation/supination occur
at this articulation.
• Arthrokinematics :
• As the elbow flexes and extends, the concave
radial head slides in the same direction as the bone
motion, so with elbow flexion, the concave head
slides anteriorly, and with elbow extension, it slides
posteriorly. With pronation and supination of the
forearm, the radial head spins on the capitulum.
15. Proximal ( superior ) Radioulnar Articulation
Characteristics : The convex rim of the radial head
articulates with the concave radial notch on the ulna
and the annular ligament. This ligament encircles the
rim of the radial head and stabilizes it against the
ulna. The primary motion is pronation/ supination.
Arthrokinematics : As the forearm rotates into
pronation and supination, the convex rim of the
radial head slides opposite the bone motion, so with
pronation, the head slides posteriorly (dorsally) on
the radial notch, and with supination, it slides
anteriorly (volarly). It also slides in the annular
ligament, and the proximal surface spins on the
Capitulum.
17. • Elbow flexion and extension take place at the humeroulnar and
humeroradial articulation.
• The normal range of flexion-extension is from 0° to 146° with a functional
range of 30° to 130°.
• The normal range of forearm pronation-supination averages from 71° of
pronation to 81° of supination.
• Most activities are accomplished within the functional range of 50°
pronation to 50° supination
ROM
18. Long Axes of the Humerus and Forearm
When the upper extremity is in the anatomical position (shoulder in
external rotation, elbow in extension and fully supinated), the long axis
of the humerus and the long axis of the forearm form an acute angle
medially when they meet at the elbow. The angulation in the frontal
plane is caused by the configuration of the articulating surfaces at the
humeroulnar joint. The medial aspect of the trochlea extends more
distally than does the lateral aspect, which shifts the medial aspect of
the ulna trochlear notch more distally and results in a lateral deviation
(or valgus angulation) of the ulna in relation to the humerus. This
normal valgus angulation is called the carrying angle or cubitus valgus
19. • The angle is less in children
as compared to adults and
greater in females as
compared to males,
averaging 10° and l3° of
valgus.
20. Elbow Flexion
• Biceps brachii. The biceps is a two-joint
muscle that crosses both the shoulder and
elbow and inserts close to the axis of
motion on the radius, so it also acts as a
supinator of the forearm.
• It functions most effectively as a flexor of
the elbow between 80° and 100° of flexion.
• For the optimal length-tension relationship,
the shoulder extends to lengthen the
muscle when it contracts forcefully for
elbow and forearm function
21. • If, sufficient elbow and shoulder
flexion occur together, the biceps
brachii may be so shortened that it
can generate little force. This is known
as active insufficiency.
• In contrast, shoulder extension
lengthens the biceps brachii and
increases the biceps contractile force
during elbow flexion.
22. Clinical Relevance
• Clinicians affect a patient’s elbow flexion
strength by varying the position of the elbow
or shoulder joint.
• shoulder hyperextension is a useful position
in which to exercise a patient with weakness
of the biceps brachii, since the resulting
muscle stretch enhances the muscle’s force
output.
23. Brachialis :
• The brachialis is a one-joint muscle that
inserts close to the axis of motion on the
ulna, so it is unaffected by the position of
the forearm or the shoulder; it participates
in all flexion activities of the elbow.
24. Brachioradialis :
• With its insertion a great distance
from the elbow on the distal radius,
the brachioradialis mainly functions
to provide stability to the joint.
• The brachioradialis contributes to
pronation and supination only as an
accessory muscle when resistance is
provided to the motion.
• Innervation : Radial nerve.
25. Torque
• Two forces that are equal in magnitude, opposite in direction,
parallel, and applied to the same object at different points are known
as a force couple. A force couple will always produce pure rotary
motion of an object (if there are no other forces on the object).
• The strength of rotation produced by a force couple is known as
torque (τ), or moment of force, and is a product of the magnitude of
one of the forces and the shortest distance (which always will be the
perpendicular distance) between the forces:
• τ = (F)(d)
26. Moment Arm
• The moment arm for any force vector will always be the length of a
line that is perpendicular to the force vector and intersects the joint
axis (presuming a two-dimensional perspective). In other words, the
moment arm will always be the shortest distance between a force
vector and the axis of rotation.
• The length of the moment arm is directly related to the angle of
application of the force on the segment. The angle of application of
a vector is the angle made by the intersection of the force vector
and the segment to which it applied, on the side of the joint axis
under consideration.
• The moment arms are maximal when the force is applied
perpendicular to the segment and at their minimum when the
forces lie closest to being parallel to the segment.
28. • Brachialis :
• Its moment arm (MA) is greatest at
slightly more than 100° of elbow
flexion, at which point its ability to
produce torque is greatest.
• Because the brachialis is inserted on
the ulna, it is unaffected by changes
in the forearm position brought
about by rotation of the radius. Being
a one-joint muscle, it is not affected
by the position of the shoulder.
29. • The moment arm of the biceps is largest between 80° and 100°of
elbow flexion, and therefore the biceps is capable of producing its
greatest torque in this range.
• The functioning of the biceps is affected by the position of the
shoulder because both heads of the muscle cross both the shoulder
and the elbow. If full flexion of the elbow is attempted with the
shoulder in full flexion, especially when the forearm is supinated, the
muscle’s ability to generate torque is diminished
30. • Brachioradialis :
• The brachioradialis is inserted at a
distance from the joint axis, and
therefore the largest component of
muscle force goes toward compression
of the joint surfaces and hence toward
stability.
• The peak moment arm for the
brachioradialis occurs between 100°
and 120° of elbow flexion. The
brachioradialis does not cross the
shoulder and therefore is unaffected
by the position of the shoulder.
32. • According to the length–tension
relationship, a muscle’s ability to produce
force improves as the muscle is
lengthened and diminishes as the muscle
is shortened. Thus when the elbow is
extended, the elbow flexors are
lengthened, facilitating force production.
• However, in the extended position, the
moment arms for the flexors are quite
small thereby decreasing the muscles’
capacity to generate a torque. Thus the
effect of elbow joint position on the length
of the elbow flexors is quite different from
its effect on muscle moment arm.
33. Classes Of Lever
• A lever is any rigid segment that rotates around a fulcrum.
• In a lever system, the force that is producing the resultant torque (the
force acting in the direction of rotation) is called the effort force (EF).
Because the other force must be creating an opposing torque, it is
known as the resistance force (RF).
• The moment arm for the effort force is referred to as the effort arm
(EA), whereas the moment arm for the resistance force is referred to
as the resistance arm (RA).
34. • A first-class lever is a lever system in which the
axis lies somewhere between the point of
application of the effort force and the point of
application of the resistance force.
• A second-class lever is a lever system in which
the resistance force has a point of application
between the axis and the point of application of
the effort force, which always results in the effort
arm being larger than the resistance arm.
• A third-class lever is a lever system in which the
effort force has a point of application between
the axis and the point of application of the
resistance force, which always results in the
resistance arm being larger than the effort arm.
35. Mechanical Advantage
• Mechanical advantage (M Ad) is a measure of the mechanical
efficiency of the lever system.
Mechanical advantage of a lever is the ratio of the effort arm (moment
arm of the effort force) to the resistance arm (moment arm of the
resistance force),
• M Ad = EA/RA
• Or when the effort arm is larger than the resistance arm, the
mechanical advantage will be greater than one.
36. • When a muscle is contracting concentrically (actively shortening), the
muscle must be moving the segment to which it is attached in the
direction of its pull. Therefore, the muscle will be the effort force.
• When a muscle is contracting eccentrically (actively lengthening), the
muscle must be acting in a direction opposite to the motion of the
segment; that is, the muscle must be the resistance force. When a
muscle is contracting eccentrically, it generally serves to control (slow
down) the acceleration of the segment produced by the effort force.
37. Elbow Extension
• Triceps brachii :
• The long head of the triceps brachii
crosses both the shoulder and elbow;
the other two heads are uniaxial. The
long head functions most effectively
as an elbow extensor if the shoulder
simultaneously flexes. This maintains
an optimal length–tension relationship
in the muscle.
• Innervation : Radial Nerve C6, C7 and
C8.
38. • Activity of the long head of the triceps is affected by changing
shoulder joint positions because the long head crosses both the
shoulder and the elbow. The long head’s ability to produce torque
may diminish when full elbow extension is attempted with the
shoulder in hyperextension. In this instance, the muscle is shortened
over both the elbow and shoulder simultaneously.
• Maximum isometric torque is generated at a position of 90° of elbow
flexion.
39. • The triceps is active
eccentrically to control elbow
flexion as the body is lowered
to the ground in a push-up.
• The triceps is active
concentrically to extend the
elbow when the triceps acts
in a closed kinematic chain,
such as in a push-up.
40. Clinical Relevance
• Tricep weakness in individuals with tetraplegia :
• Individuals with tetraplegia at the level of C6 lack active control of the
triceps brachii, innervated at the level of C7 and C8.
• Despite the absence of elbow extension strength, the individual is able to
bear weight on the upper extremity by locking the elbow in extension.
• Grover et al. demonstrate that an elbow flexion contraction of
approximately 25° prevents a patient with C6 tetraplegia and complete loss
of triceps brachii strength from performing a sliding transfer. Thus the
prevention of elbow flexion contractures is an essential element in the goal
of independent function for individuals with C6 tetraplegia.
41. Asymmetrical tonic neck reflex :
• The ATNR is a normally occurring motor reflex in infants. The reflex is manifested
in the upper extremities by a change in muscle tone in each upper extremity,
determined by the rotation of the head and neck. As the head is turned to one
side, there is an increase in motor tone in the extensor muscles of the upper
extremity to which the head is turned.
• This reflex usually is integrated as normal motor development unfolds during the
first year, before the child can perform many independent activities of daily living.
However, in some children with developmental delays and impaired motor
control, the reflex may continue to be evident even as the child becomes ready
for some functional independence.
• In this case, the abnormal presence of an ATNR may interfere with the child’s
ability to gain independence in activities such as self-feeding. As the child looks at
the hand with the food in it, the extensor tone increases in that limb, increasing
the difficulty of flexing the elbow and bringing the food to the mouth.
43. Anconeus :
• The anconeus muscle stabilizes the
elbow during supination and
pronation and assists in elbow
extension
• Innervation : Radial Nerve
44. Supinator :
• The proximal attachment of the
supinator at the annular and
lateral collateral ligaments.
• may function to stabilize the
lateral aspect of the elbow.
• Unlike the biceps brachii, its
effectiveness as a supinator is
not influenced by the elbow
position.
• Innervation : Posterior
interosseous nerve.
Forearm Supination
45. Biceps brachii.
• The biceps muscle acts as a supinator if the elbow simultaneously
flexes or if resistance is given to supination when the elbow is in
extension.
Brachioradialis :
• The brachioradialis contributes to pronation and supination only as an
accessory muscle when resistance is provided to the motion. It
cannot function alone as a rotator or stabilizer of the forearm joints
when other forearm muscles are paralyzed.
46. Forearm Pronation
Pronator teres :
• The pronator muscle pronates as
well as stabilizes the proximal
radioulnar joint and helps
approximate the humeroradial
articulation.
• Innervation : Median nerve.
47. Pronator quadratus :
• The pronator quadratus is a one-
joint muscle and is active during
all pronation activities.
• Innervation : Median nerve.
48. Screw Home Mechanism
• The arthrokinematics at the humeroradial joint involve a spin of the fovea of the
radial head against the rounded capitulum of the humerus. The arthrokinematics
during active pronation under the power of the pronator teres muscle.
Contraction of this muscle as well as others inserting into the radius can generate
significant compression forces on the humeroradial joint, especially when the
joint is near extension. This compression force is associated with a proximal
migration of the radius, which is greater during active pronation than during
supination.Because the interosseous membrane as a whole is relatively slackened
in pronation, it is likely less able to resist the proximal pull on the radius imparted
by pronator muscle contraction. The natural proximal migration of the radius and
associated increased joint compression of the humeroradial joint during active
pronation has been referred to as the “screw home” mechanism of the elbow.
49. Based on location, the humeroradial joint is
mechanically linked to the kinematics of both
the elbow and forearm. Any motion
performed at the elbow or forearm requires
movement at this joint. A postmortem study
of 32 cadavers (age at death ranging from 70
to 95 years) showed more frequent and
severe degeneration across the humeroradial
than the humero-ulnar joint.The increased
wear on the lateral compartment of the
elbow can be explained in part by the
frequent and complex arthrokinematics (spin
and roll-and-slide), combined with varying
amounts of muscular-produced compression
force.
51. Supracondylar Fracture
• Simple supracondylar fractures are typically seen in younger children, and
are uncommon in adults; 90% are seen in children younger than 10 years of
age, with a peak age of 5-7 years.
Mechanism :
• There are two types of supracondylar fractures: extension (95-98%) and
flexion (<5%) types.
• Extension type supracondylar fractures typically occur as a result of a fall
on a hyper-extended elbow. When this occurs, the olecranon acts as a
fulcrum after engaging in the olecranon fossa. The humerus fractures
anteriorly initially and then posteriorly. They result in an extra-articular
fracture line, and (when displaced) posterior displacement of the distal
component.
52. • The Gartland classification of supracondylar fractures of the humerus is
based on the degree and direction of displacement, and the presence of intact
cortex. It applies to extension supracondylar fractures rather than the
rare flexion supracondylar fracture.
57. • There are three main complications.
• malunion: resulting in cubitus varus (varus deformity of the elbow, also
known as gunstock deformity)
• ischemic contracture (Volkmann contracture) due to damage/occlusion to
the brachial artery and resulting in volar compartment syndrome
• damage to the ulnar nerve, median nerve, or radial nerve
• most commonly insured at the time of injury is the anterior interosseous
nerve (AIN; a branch of the median nerve), followed by the radial nerve
and then the ulnar nerve. Ulnar nerve injury is more common in flexion
type fractures.
58. Medial epicondyle fracture
Epidemiology :
• Medial epicondylar avulsion fractures are the most common
avulsion injury of the elbow and are typically seen in children
and adolescents 4. Medial epicondyle fractures are often
associated with elbow dislocation and make up
approximately 12-20% of all pediatric elbow fractures.
59. • posterior elbow dislocation transmitting force to the medial epicondyle via the
ulnar collateral ligament (most common; accounts for two-thirds of cases of
medial epicondylar fractures 3)
• fall on an outstretched hand with the elbow in full extension, resulting in
sudden traction on the flexor-pronator muscle group of the forearm.
62. Lateral Condyle Fracture
Epidemiology
•They represent ~12.5% (range 5-20%) of elbow
fractures in children and are the second most
common pediatric elbow fracture
after supracondylar fractures.
•They occur in school-age children, with a peak
at 6 years.
63. Mechanism :
• These occur either after fall onto an outstretched hand.
• Two theories exist regarding mechanism of injury: push-off
and pull-off theories2.
• The push-off theory suggests there is a direct force
upwards and outwards causing the radial head to impact
the capitellum2.
• The pull-off theory suggest the lateral condyle avulses due
to the extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis creating a
varus stress on a supinated forearm
67. Posterolateral Rotatory Innstability
• O’Driscoll is credited with the description and detailing of
posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Osborne and
Cotterill were the first to appreciate fully the importance of
the lateral ligamentous complex in recurrent instability and
describe the findings of PLRI. The rotatory instability
develops due to injury to lateral UCL that happens with a
combination of axial compression, valgus stress and
supination (or external rotation).
69. Elbow Dislocation
• Elbow dislocation is the second most common large joint
dislocation in adults and the most common in children.
• If an elbow dislocation is associated with a fracture (fracture-
dislocation), it is called "complex." An isolated dislocation
without fracture is "simple.“
• The most common associated fracture in adults is a radial
head fracture, although coronoid process fracture is also
common. When all of these occur together in a severe
posterior dislocation, it is known as the terrible triad of the
elbow .
70. Clinical Presentation
• Patients typically present complaining of a painful, swollen joint
after a fall on an outstretched hand; also commonly occurs in the
context of motor vehicle accidents, violence, and sporting events.
• In posterior dislocations the affected elbow is commonly held in
mid-flexion, whereas patients with anterior dislocations tend to
adopt a position of forearm supination with extension at the
elbow.
• Inspection may reveal a prominent olecranon posteriorly, and the
ipsilateral forearm may appear "shortened" compared to the
contralateral extremity.
• Range of motion will be decreased.
71. Mechanism
• Posterior dislocations typically occur following a fall onto an extended arm,
either with hyperextension or a posterolateral rotatory mechanism.
75. Complications
• Ulnar nerve :
most common neuropraxia associated with posterior
dislocation.
• Median nerve :
anterior interosseous branch typically involved may be
entrapped during closed reduction of a posterior dislocation.
• Radial nerve
• Brachial artery :
associated with anterior dislocations.
76. Distraction Injuries
Pulled elbow :
• A tensile force of sufficient
magnitude exerted on a pronated
and extended forearm may cause
the radius to be pulled inferiorly
out of the annular ligament. This
injury is common in children
younger than 5 years and rare in
adults. Lifting a small child up into
the air by one or both hands or
yanking a child by one hand is the
usual causative mechanism, and
therefore the injury is referred to
as either nursemaid’s elbow or
pulled elbow.
79. Tennis Elbow
• Lateral epicondylitis, also known as tennis elbow, is an overuse
syndrome of the common extensor tendon and predominantly affects
the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon.
• Clinical Presentation :
• Patients often present with lateral elbow pain, tenderness and
swelling, which is frequently exacerbated when they grasp objects
during wrist extension with resistance.
80. Golfer’s Elbow
• Golfer’s elbow, also known as medial epicondylitis, medial
epicondylalgia, or medial epicondylosis, involves the common
flexor/pronator tendon at the tenoperiosteal junction near the medial
epicondyle. It is associated with repetitive movements into wrist
flexion, such as swinging a golf club, pitching a ball, or work-related
grasping, shuffling papers, and lifting heavy objects.
81. Etiology of Symptoms
• The most common cause of epicondylalgia is excessive repetitive use
or eccentric strain of the wrist or forearm muscles. The result is
microdamage and partial tears, usually near the musculotendinous
junction when the strain exceeds the strength of the tissues and
when the demand exceeds the repair process. Initially there may be
signs of inflammation followed by the formation of granulation tissue
and adhesions.
• With repetitive trauma, fibroblastic activity and collagen weakening
occurs. Recurring problems are seen because the resulting immobile
or immature scar is re-damaged when returning to activities before
there is sufficient healing or mobility in the surrounding tissue.
83. Cubital tunnel syndrome
• The cubital tunnel is an osseous/fibrous tunnel posterior to the
medial epicondyle of the humerus associated with the origin of the
flexor carpi ulnaris muscle.
• The cubital tunnel is a potential site of entrapment of the ulnar nerve,
resulting in “cubital tunnel syndrome.”
• Ulnar nerve compression results in loss of intrinsic hand function and
paresthesia on the medial aspect of the hand.
86. Myositis Ossificans
• The terms myositis ossificans and heterotopic or ectopic bone
formation are often used interchangeably to describe the
formation of bone in atypical locations of the body.
Etiology of Symptoms :
• Although not a common phenomenon, the sites most frequently
involved are the elbow region and thigh
• In the elbow, heterotopic bone formation most often develops in
the brachialis muscle or joint capsule as the result of trauma, such
as a comminuted fracture of the radial head, a fracture dislocation
(supracondylar or radial head fracture) of the elbow, or a tear of
the brachialis tendon.
87. • Patients with neurological impairments, specifically traumatic brain
injury or spinal cord injury, and patients with burns to the extremities
are also prone to develop this complication. It also may develop as
the result of aggressive stretching of the elbow flexors after injury and
a period of immobilization.
• After the acute inflammatory period, heterotopic bone formation is
laid down in muscle between, not within, individual muscle fibers or
around the joint capsule within a 2- to 4-week period.