Skip to main content

Questions tagged [group-theory]

Group theory is a branch of abstract algebra. A group is a set of objects, together with a binary operation, that satisfies four axioms. The set must be closed under the operation and contain an identity object. Every object in the set must have an inverse, and the operation must be associative. Groups are used in physics to describe symmetry operations of physical systems.

0 votes
0 answers
16 views

"Linear independency" of Lie Brackets [migrated]

I was watching this eigenchris video. At 21:49, he says: $$[g_i, g_j]=\Sigma_k {f_{ij}}^{k}g_k$$ for $\mathfrak{so}(3)$. Does this mean $[g_i, g_j]$ and $g_i, g_j$ can be linear independent? What ...
Cro's user avatar
  • 137
2 votes
0 answers
35 views

A reference for the fact that the second cohomology of the full Poincare algebra is zero

S. Weinberg in his book "The quantum theory of fields" vol. I says in page 86 that the full Poincare algebra is not semi-simple but its central charges can be eliminated (as he showed in the ...
Mahtab's user avatar
  • 374
2 votes
2 answers
125 views

Given a representation $(n, m)$ of the Lorentz group, is the little group representation just the tensor product $n \otimes m$?

I've been reading Weinberg's QFT Vol 1. and more specifically section 5.6. I would like to know if my understanding is correct or if I missed something. He starts with the full Lorentz group $\mathrm{...
Wihtedeka's user avatar
  • 2,068
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

How to find Casimir operator eigenvalues of $SU(N)$? [closed]

The $[f1, f2, f3…fn]$ in the image represent the irreducible representations of $SU[n]$. How to find the irreducible representations of $SU[n]$ that conform to the form $[f1, f2...fn]$. Can you give ...
snow snow's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
111 views

Does all symmetry breaking have corresponding unitary group?

In high energy physics. Symmetry breaking like electroweak's has corresponding $SU(2)\times U(1)$ unitary gauge group broken down to $U(1)$. Does it mean all kinds of symmetry breaking (even low ...
Jtl's user avatar
  • 425
3 votes
1 answer
85 views

What is the importance of $SU(2)$ being the double cover of $SO(3)$?

To my understanding, it is important that $SU(2)$ is (isomorphic to) the universal cover of $SO(3)$. This is important because $SU(2)$ is then simply-connected and has a Lie algebra isomorphic to $\...
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 2,676
2 votes
1 answer
98 views

$Ad\circ\exp=\exp\circ ad$ and $e^{i(\theta/2)\hat{n}\cdot\sigma}\sigma e^{-i(\theta/2)\hat{n}\cdot\sigma}=e^{\theta\hat{n}\cdot J}\sigma$

This question is inspired by my recent question How to prove $e^{+i(\theta/2)(\hat{n}\cdot \sigma)}\sigma e^{-i(\theta/2)(\hat{n}\cdot \sigma)} = e^{\theta \hat{n}\cdot J}\sigma$? with answer https://...
Jagerber48's user avatar
  • 14.4k
2 votes
4 answers
408 views

How to prove $e^{+i(\theta/2)(\hat{n}\cdot \sigma)}\sigma e^{-i(\theta/2)(\hat{n}\cdot \sigma)} = e^{\theta \hat{n}\cdot J}\sigma$?

Disclaimer: I'm sure this has been asked 100 times before, but I can't find the question asked or answered quite like this. If there are specific duplicates that could give me a simple satisfactory ...
Jagerber48's user avatar
  • 14.4k
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

Help with Wigner-Eckert Theorem problem

Currently trying to solve the following problem: Consider an operator $O_x$ for $x = 1$ to $2$, transforming according to the spin $1/2$ representation as follows: $$ [J_a, O_x] = O_y[\sigma_a]_{yx} / ...
DingleGlop's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
168 views

Can you ever obtain a pure rotation from composing Lorentz transformations?

An exercise asks one to show that given $v, u$ speeds much smaller than $c$ and oriented orthagonally, the composition of the lorentz boosts $B(\mathbf{v})B(\mathbf{u})B(\mathbf{-v})B(\mathbf{-u})$ is ...
Y G's user avatar
  • 75
0 votes
0 answers
52 views

Rotation and translation of a function of a 3D vector

I want to change the frame by doing translation and rotation. $$f(\vec{v})=\sum_{n,l,m}R_{nl}(v)Y_{lm}(\hat{v})f_{nlm}^v.$$ Let, $\mathcal{R}$ be the rotation matrix and $\mathcal{T}$ be the ...
QED's user avatar
  • 11
-1 votes
1 answer
74 views

From any element of $\mathrm{SO}(8)$, can we always find one corresponding $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ element?

I first recap the relation between $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ and $\mathrm{SO}(3)$ and then raise my question concerning $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ and $\mathrm{SO}(8)$. Given any traceless hermitian matrix $H$, we can ...
narip's user avatar
  • 307
19 votes
5 answers
2k views

Is intrinsic spin a quantum or/and a relativistic phenomenon?

Ok, this is my reasoning. I am probably making some wrong assumptions here, pls tell me where I am going wrong. Spin as a quantum phenomenon: Quantum phenomena disappear as the Planck constant goes to ...
Saeed's user avatar
  • 309
3 votes
1 answer
132 views

Rotation of spherical harmonics

I have a question about the rotation of spherical harmonics. In Wikipedia it is mentioned that if we make a rotation in 3D space: $R\vec{r}=\vec{r}'$,then the Spherical Harmonics can be written as a ...
Thanos Athanasopoulos's user avatar
3 votes
5 answers
219 views

What does the $N$ in $SU(N)$ mean?

So I know this is a very basic question, but I can't really wrap my head around it. I was told $N$ is the number of dimensions in the rotations of the group theory that we are considering, so I ...
minime's user avatar
  • 99
1 vote
0 answers
54 views

Do GUT's really explain parity violation?

Every book on the Standard Model introduces early on the concept of left and right-handed quantum fields, defined as \begin{align} (\psi_L)_{\alpha} = \left(\frac{1-\gamma_5}{2}\right)_{\alpha \beta}\...
user38680's user avatar
  • 131
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Free fields in Weinberg QFT vol.1

Background: In section 5.1 Weinberg discusses free fields. He had shown that for interaction of the form, $V(t) = \int{d^3x \mathscr{H}(\mathbf{x},t)}$ if $$U_0(\Lambda,a) \mathscr{H}(x) U_0^{-1}(\...
Damo's user avatar
  • 56
1 vote
1 answer
76 views

Why are Lorentz transformations singular at $i^0$?

On pg. 16 of Strominger's lectures, it is said Lorentz transformations themselves are not smooth at spatial infinity, because the vector fields that generate them are singular at $i_0$. A boost ...
Sanjana's user avatar
  • 785
4 votes
1 answer
128 views

Is the factorization method of Hamiltonian related to the theory of Lie groups?

I was learning about algebraic methods to solve the H atom, when I came across the factorization method. It is mentioned in various textbooks, notes and papers, like the one from Infeld and Hull. I am ...
Po1ynomial's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
44 views

One-Loop beta function for gauge couplings

I am currently doing my homework on Standard Model one-loop correction. When I am reading Quantum Field Theory by Mark Srednicki and Journeys Beyond the Standard Model by Pierre Ramond, I notice some ...
quantumology's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
59 views

Wigner-Eckart theorem in classical physics?

The Wigner-Eckart theorem is a useful result in quantum physics and its many applications. Most presentations of this material in books on QM and online lecture notes seem to be variations on the same ...
z.v.'s user avatar
  • 257
3 votes
0 answers
36 views

Why do we study Heisenberg Lie group or Heisenberg Lie algebra?

Consider $\mathbb{R}^2$ as an Abelian Lie algebra and let $c$ be a non-zero antisymmetric bilinear form on $\mathbb{R}^2$. We then define the three-dimensional Heisenberg Lie algebra $\mathbb{R}^3=\...
Mahtab's user avatar
  • 374
2 votes
0 answers
21 views

Is it enough just to check the effect of a boost in the z-direction to prove the covariance of an expression for the lorentz transformations?

Is it enough to check the effect of a boost in the z-direction to prove the Lorentz invariance of an expression for the $L^\uparrow _+$ transformations? My argument why this is true is that we can ...
Xhorxho's user avatar
  • 189
0 votes
1 answer
57 views

Does the Wigner little group classification of particles have consequences for classical field theory?

Does the Wigner little group classification of particles have consequences for classical field theory? In particular, I'm curious whether it can be used to predict the two propagating modes for ...
user196574's user avatar
  • 2,292
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Followup question to "Invariant symbol, group representation"

There is a 2 year old answer by Cosmas Zachos which is very helpful regarding invariant symbols here. Aside this context, I have never encountered these and thus I have 3 questions: Why is it ...
JohnA.'s user avatar
  • 1,713
0 votes
1 answer
94 views

Rotation of Pauli Vectors with $SU(2)$ reproduces the $SO(3)$ matrix. but do all $SU(2)$ matrices reproduces $SO(3)$?

So we can write the $SU(2)$ matrices multiplication as this. $$\begin{bmatrix}\alpha&\beta\\-\beta^*&\alpha^*\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}z&x-iy\\x+iy&-z\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\...
abx_pradB's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
72 views

What is the meaning of the tensor product ($\otimes$) of groups? Is is the same as the cartesian product ($\times$)? [duplicate]

In the high energy physics literature and in some discussions on group theory for physics, the tensor product $\otimes$ of groups is sometimes mentioned. For example, the gauge group of the standard ...
Aqualone's user avatar
  • 376
2 votes
1 answer
42 views

Abelian vs non-abelian discrete symmetries in neutrino physics

I was reading about the parametrization of the PMNS matrix and stumbled upon an article of Serguey Petcov$^1$ about discrete flavour symmetries. It endeavors to see if there is a pattern induced by a ...
AZ0409's user avatar
  • 21
3 votes
0 answers
48 views

How does the Hamiltonian act on the multiplicity space of irreps?

My question in the title stems from not completely understanding the last three lines of this answer. I list specific questions at the end of this post. Setup. Consider a quantum system described over ...
Maple's user avatar
  • 171
4 votes
1 answer
377 views

Why do physicists refer to irreducible representations as "charges" or "charge sectors"?

My question is in the title: Why do physicists refer to irreducible representations (irreps) as "charges" or "charge sectors"? For concrete examples, irreps are referred to as &...
Maple's user avatar
  • 171

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
7