Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
0 answers
29 views

Why every projective irreducible representation of $(ISO(2,1)^{\uparrow}=SO(2,1)^{\uparrow}\ltimes \mathbb{R}^3)$ is equivalent?

Why every projective irreducible representation of the connected poincare group $(ISO(2,1)^{\uparrow}=SO(2,1)^{\uparrow}\ltimes \mathbb{R}^3)$ is equivalent to a projective irreducible representation ...
Mahtab's user avatar
  • 374
2 votes
0 answers
95 views

Why representations? [duplicate]

I've been studying Talagrand's What is a Quantum Field Theory? lately and I have some questions regarding the scheme he presents. Essentially the state of affairs as of where I am in the book is that ...
Lourenco Entrudo's user avatar
9 votes
6 answers
2k views

What exactly is a quantum field?

As I understand it, a relativistic quantum field is an operator-valued function of spacetime that transforms under some finite dimensional irreducible representation of the Lorentz* group: \begin{...
QFTheorist's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
126 views

In what sense are fields representations of the Poincare group?

As far as I know, a representation is a homomorphism from the group to a vector space $V$ which preserves the group multiplication, i.e., if $(\pi,V)$ is a representation of the group $G$, then ...
QFTheorist's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
113 views

What's the definition of spin for a particle in $d$-dimensional Minkowski spacetime?

Consider a relativistic quantum theory in d-dimensional flat spacetime. Neglecting possible internal symmetries, a particle is defined as a system whose Hilbert space furnishes the support of an ...
Jack Euler's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
76 views

Why do we need to consider the full Poincare group to get unitary representations?

I am trying to study and understand QFT from the perspective of symmetries. I was referred to this super helpful answer by @ACuriousMind : https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/174908/50583. I still ...
qavidfostertollace's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
243 views

Some question about the irreducible representation of Poincare group

I am writing a note about the Poincare group and I am trying to explain that argument that one-particle state transforms under irreducible unitary representations of the Poincare group. However, there ...
David Shaw's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
48 views

General element of the Poincare group

Consider the generators of the Poincare group are $M^{\mu\nu}$ and $P^\mu$. The Lorentz group elements are $g(\omega)\in SO(1,3)=e^{-\frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}M^{\mu\nu}}$ and the translation group ...
Tanmoy Pati's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
180 views

Doubt in Poincare Algebra

So, I have been reading Lecture notes on "Supersymmetry and Extra Dimensions" (PDF), taken by Flip Tanedo (notes of the course of SUSY and Extra Dimension taken by Professor Quevedo, ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 85
2 votes
1 answer
227 views

Do generators of translations transform as *covariant* vectors under a homogeneous Lorentz transformation?

Using the composition law of Poincaré transformations, it is easy to see (cf. e.g. Ref. 1 this answer) that under a Lorentz transformation $$\underbrace{U(\Lambda,0)P^\mu U(\Lambda,0)^{-1}}_{P'^{\mu}}=...
Mr. Feynman's user avatar
  • 1,989
5 votes
3 answers
371 views

Why the Pauli-Lubansky and momentum operator build an irreducible representation of Poincarè group?

We know that particle states in QFT are identified with irreducible representation of Poincarè group, in particular they can be identified using Pauli-Lubansky and (squared) Momentum operator (wich ...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 475
1 vote
0 answers
55 views

What are the discrete representations of the Poincare group, analogous to the $(j_1, j_2)$ representations of the Lorentz group?

The finite dimensional representations of the Lorentz group are given by two half-integers $(j_1, j_2)$. One can break up the Lorentz Lie algebra into two $\mathfrak{so}(3)$ Lie algebras, and the half-...
user1379857's user avatar
  • 11.6k
2 votes
1 answer
466 views

In the Poincaré group, what are explicit representations of translations, boosts, and rotations?

Context In [1], cowlicks asks, ``How can the Gallilean transformations form a group?''. In [1] Selene Routely explains that the Galilean transformations form a group of dimension 10. Routely explains ...
Michael Levy's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
274 views

What we talk about when we talk about Lorentz transformations?

Context In [1], cowlicks asks the question, ``How can the Gallilean transformations form a group?'' It is clear what a group is. Borrowing liberally from [2], "A group is a set $G$ together with ...
Michael Levy's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
60 views

Is every unitary representation of the Poincare group a direct sum of Wigner's irreducible representations?

Is Wigner's classification of unitary irreducible representations of the Poincare group [1] sufficient for constructing all unitary representations of the Poincare group by taking direct sums? The ...
Luke's user avatar
  • 2,270

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5 6