Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
106 views

How does one prove without the axiom of choice that the product of a collection of nonempty well-ordered sets is nonempty?

Suppose $\{X_{\alpha}\}_{\alpha\in\mathcal A}$ is an indexed family of nonempty well-ordered sets, where $X_{\alpha}=(E_{\alpha},\le_{\alpha})$ for each $\alpha$. It seems intuitively obvious that we ...
Joe's user avatar
  • 20.8k
0 votes
2 answers
145 views

Can every statement that can be proved using the well-ordering principle be proved using weak mathematical induction?

The following is problem 30 of chapter 4.4 of Discrete Mathematics with Applications, 3rd ed. by Susanna Epp: Prove that if a statement can be proved by the well-ordering principle, then it can be ...
user985091's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
126 views

a proof idea: Every well-ordered set has an order-preserving bijection to exactly one ordinal.

I have seen a proof of the statement, and its usually by transfinite induction. And I'm trying to find out why my proof doesn't work, it seems too simple: Let $X$ be a well-ordered set. Define $X^{<...
hteica's user avatar
  • 438
0 votes
1 answer
124 views

Why is well-ordering needed to define the statement "$\forall i, \, P(i) \implies P(i + 1)$"?

I have learned a proof that the well ordering principle is equivalent to the inductive property for $\mathbb{N}$, and have understood it. However, I am confused as to the following statement my notes ...
Princess Mia's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote
1 answer
95 views

What are the order types of computable pseudo-ordinals with no c.e. descending chains?

The notion of a “computable pseudo-ordinal”, i.e. a computable linearly ordered set with no hyperarithmetical descending chains, is an old one going back to Stephen Kleene. Joe Harrison wrote the ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
66 views

Does a total or well ordering has a countable cofinal

I read a post sometime earlier asking about the cardinality of total ordering on a set, which I forgot about the detail but led me to this question. For a total/well-ordered set $A$ does there exist ...
wsz_fantasy's user avatar
  • 1,732
1 vote
1 answer
70 views

Induction principle on well ordered set

I'm new and very grateful this site exists. If I do something wrong, feel free to tell me. I have to prove the following: Let $S$ be a subset of a well ordered set $L$ with the conditions: a) $0_L \in ...
anoniem's user avatar
  • 291
2 votes
2 answers
145 views

What is the meaning of "induction up to a given ordinal"?

Given an ordinal $\alpha$, what does it mean: "induction up to $\alpha$"? When $\alpha=\omega$, is this is ordinary mathematical induction? Also, Goodstein's Theorem is equivalent to "...
John's user avatar
  • 4,442
0 votes
0 answers
118 views

A Doubt about Well Ordering Principle and Principle of Mathematical Induction

I have had this lingering doubt in my mind for a very long time: One of the standard constructions of N starts by assuming the 5 Peano Axioms, proving that every non-zero is a successor and s(n) is ...
Tara Nanda's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
100 views

Why does model theory treat well-ordered but uncountable languages?

In model theory, results such as the Compactness theorem and the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem hold true, not only in countable languages, but in well-ordered languages. I'm not questioning this idea in ...
Doubt's user avatar
  • 1,779
0 votes
1 answer
56 views

Confusion Regarding Notation in a Proof about two Well-Ordered Sets

This partial proof is taken from A Course in Mathematical Logic for Mathematicians by Yu. I. Manin. Lemma. Let X and Y be two well-ordered sets. Then exactly one of the following alternatives holds: (...
N. Bar's user avatar
  • 1,610
0 votes
1 answer
327 views

An elementary error in Principia Mathematica?

This is a quote from page 1, volume III of Principia Mathematica, by Whitehead and Russell: "A 'well-ordered' series is one which is such that every existent class contained in it has a first ...
Michael Fox's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
33 views

$\forall x \in X: (y < x \implies y \in E) \implies x \in E$

Let $(X, \leq)$ be well-ordered and non-empty. If $E \subseteq X$ satisfies (i) $\min E \in X$ (ii) $\forall x \in X: ((y < x \implies y \in E) \implies x \in E)$ Then $E=X$. Proof: Assume $...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
369 views

Disparity between Induction and Well-ordering Principles

Over classical logic, the induction and well-ordering schemas are equivalent. These schemas state the following, given any linear ordering $(W,<)$ and property $Q$ on $W$: Induction: $∀k{∈}W\ ( \ ∀...
user21820's user avatar
  • 59.2k
1 vote
1 answer
91 views

Can order types of well-ordered proper classes be put in one to one correspondence with $V$?

This is a follow-up to my question here. Ordinals are order types of well-ordered sets. Proper classes can be well-ordered too, the most famous example being the class of all ordinals under the ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar

15 30 50 per page