Wonderful book! “Direct Conversations: Talks With Fellow DC Comics Bronze Age Creators” by Paul Kupperberg (Crazy 8 Press, 2023). A sort of follow up Wonderful book! “Direct Conversations: Talks With Fellow DC Comics Bronze Age Creators” by Paul Kupperberg (Crazy 8 Press, 2023). A sort of follow up to his “Directs Comments: Comic Book Creators in Their Own Words” book also self-published by the author through Crazy 8 Press in 2021).
Kupperberg joined DC Comics in 1975 as a freelance writer and then went on staff there (the first of a couple times) two years later in 1977. But he was already a familiar name and face for many working at DC’s New York City offices because of his many visits there for the DC weekly office tours open to the public, his activity in the very active comics “fandom” (those who not only read the comic books but also created amateur “fanzines” and who attended the early comic book conventions), and because of his older brother, Alan Kupperberg, who was hired onto DC’s production staff in 1971 straight out of high school.
“Direct Conversations” is a book of ten newly conducted interviews by Kupperberg with his fellow comics creators (writers, artists, letterers, colorists, and editors) who were not only all but one co-workers with him at one point or another at DC, but who all were part of that first great influx of new comic book creators and editors to come in at the start of the 1970s who had all started out as comic book readers and collectors. The older artists, writers, and editors already there at DC that they would be joining (and learning from) had basically been the same ones from the start of the American comic book industry in the late 1930s and 1940s on up to the beginning of the 1970s. There were a few exceptions, like artist Neal Adams, and writer, Roy Thomas, but for the most part DC Comics was a “closed shop” (very difficult for anyone new to come into it) throughout the 1950s and 1960s. But the changing nature of the industry—including the drying up of the traditional newsstand distribution system in favor of what would become the direct market system selling most comic books through dedicated comic book shops, which resulted in expanded line ups and the short term return of anthology type titles requiring as many as four to six additional “back-up stories” per issue—as well as the inevitable aging out of the older generation opened the doors to many young new faces like Kupperberg and those he interviews here.
His interview subject’s (following an introduction by Robert Greenberger, who also came to work at DC but just a bit too late to qualify as one of the ten subjects interviewed) are, in the order they appear, Paul Levitz, Anthony Tollin, Steve Mitchell, Joe Staton, Bob Rozakis, Jack C. Harris, Howard V. Chaykin, Bob Toomey, Tony Isabella, and Michael Uslan. I’m not going to go into who all of these people are here but for anyone who regularly read DC Comics in the 1970s and 1980s, many if not most of these names are very familiar. As are the legendary figures they reminisce about working with and for back in those early years: Julius Schwartz, Sol Harrison, Carmine Infantino, Jack Adler, Murray Boltinoff, Joe Kubert, plus many many less familiar names and those that only they who worked there would have any reason to know, like the various secretaries, proofreaders, reprints editors, etc.
Some of the ones interviewed here were unofficially known at the time as “the Junior Woodchucks” (after Disney’s Huey, Dewey, and Louie comic books). Others, including Kupperberg, escaped that particular label, but they all share a very interesting bond in the shared experiences at DC during what later became known as comics “Bronze Age”.
(I was born in 1972 and was reading comic books by the end of the 1970s, so this was my own personal entry point into comic books, the later part of the Bronze Age, late 1970s/early 1980s. And at that time, older issues from the early 1970s were still quite plentiful and easy to acquire.)
I give “Direct Conversations: Talks With Fellow DC Comics Bronze Age Creators” my highest recommendation for all of the Bronze Age DC Comics fans out there, plus anyone in general who likes to read about comic books “behind the scenes”/history. I gave it five out of five stars on GoodReads. (Checked out from my local public library, Tampa/Hillsborough Public Library, which added it to their collection upon my request.)...more
Last night, I finished reading "Batman '89" (2022, published by DC Comics), by Sam Hamm (writer), Joe Quiñones (artist), Leonardo Ito (colorist), ClayLast night, I finished reading "Batman '89" (2022, published by DC Comics), by Sam Hamm (writer), Joe Quiñones (artist), Leonardo Ito (colorist), Clayton Cowles (letterer).
Reprints material originally released in single issue comic books format as "Batman '89" #1-6 (October 2021-September 2022). (Was originally announced to be a DC "Digital First" release starting in July 2021 and to run for twelve digital comic book chapters in that format prior to appearing in print, but the smaller digital release chapters apparently didn't end up happening.)
This hardcover collected edition has a cover by Joe Quiñones, and also original issues cover art by Joe Quiñones, Jerry Ordway and Steve Oliff, Taurin Clarke, Mitch Gerads, Lee Weeks, Babs Tarr, Adam Hughes and Julian Totino Tedesco. Also includes a nine page "Batman '89 Sketchbook" by Joe Quiñones.
Buoyed by the success of recent newly released original comic book series based on the 1966-1968 Adam West "Batman" television series (under the title "Batman '66") and 1975-1979 Lynda Carter television series ("Wonder Woman '77"), DC Comics took things to the next logical step and ventured in 2021 into telling original adventures of their two greatest motion picture renditions of their Superman and Batman characters, namely the Christopher Reeve "Superman: The Movie" (1978) and Michael Keaton "Batman" (1989) versions.
Prior to this, DC's only comic books featuring the Reeve and Keaton versions of their characters were single issue movie adaptations of "Superman III" (1983) and "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace" (1987)—there were no comic book or novel adaptations of "Superman: The Movie" (1978) or "Superman II" (1980) due to the deal made between Warner Bros. and original movie story writer, Mario Puzo—and single issue comic book adaptations of "Batman" (1989) and "Batman Returns" (1992) (and also the two subsequent Batman sequels that didn't star Michael Keaton, "Batman Forever" (1995) and "Batman and Robin" (1997). (These single issue comic book adaptations all came out in the same years as their respective movies.)
"Batman '89", this new story by Hamm, Quiñones, et al., clearly takes place after the events of "Batman Returns" (as not only is Selina Kyle--the Michelle Pfeiffer version of the character--a major character in this story but they also make reference to events that occurred in "Batman Returns"). However, this must take place in a universe or timeline where events then led directly into this story rather than into the following two Joel Schumacher directed Batman films, "Batman Forever" and "Batman and Robin", as will become clear in my plot summary.
Before that, however, I should mention that Sam Hamm, who wrote this, is the same Sam Hamm who co-wrote the screenplay for the Tim Burton directed "Batman" 1989 film. (Or, rather, wrote the initial draft chosen to be filmed. The script then received rewrites by Warren Skaaren and other writers.) So, unlike the "Superman '78" comic book, "Batman '89" does actually have a creator who has direct ties to the actual film. (Hamm also received a story credit on "Batman Returns" for two early script drafts he wrote but director Burton then replaced Hamm with script writer, Daniel Waters, and little of Hamm's story contributions remained in the final film.)
Hamm's "Batman '89" story focusses on one of the plot points he had included in his early unused "Batman Returns" scripts, that of Harvey Dent's (played by Billy Dee Williams in the first movie) descent into the villain, Two-Face. Here, he is still Gotham's district attorney, and he is leading a campaign to capture and prosecute the Batman as an out-of-control vigilante, and for removing Jim Gordon as Police Commissioner (despite Dent at the same time being in a romantic relationship with Jim Gordon's daughter, police sergeant Barbara Gordon). Dent is friends with Bruce Wayne, who Dent (of course) does not know is Batman.
At the start of the story, Wayne (as Batman), makes a serious mistake, leading to the death of an innocent teenager (the police accidentally shooting the teen while firing at him). This leads to additional anti Batman sentiments. Another masked vigilante protecting the poorer denizens of Gotham, this one a black teenager named Drake Winston, at first is antagonistic towards the Batman. (He wears a version of the Robin costume although the only reference to anyone calling him that is two kids in the background discussing what Batman had called him. One says he heard Batman call him "Robin", like in Robin Hood. The other says, "Naw, dumbass! He said the dude was robbin' the store." "Oh... that makes sense." And, at the end, Bruce asks him what he should call Drake and Drake replies, "Well... You're a bat guy, I'm a bird guy... So, I'm think'... The Avenging Eagle." Bruce: "'The Avenging Eagle'..." Drake: "It's not final. I'm still deciding...")
Dent, (again, of course), has an accident that freakishly disfigures the left side of his face, this time in an automobile repair garage fire (that I've already forgotten just who set on fire, just that there were a lot of bombs going off all over Gotham) that Dent runs into to try to same Winston, who Dent believes is still inside. There are also scenes prior to this showing Dent already fixated with tossing a coin (although it's a trick coin with two "heads" sides).
I'm not going to try to summarize the story past this point except to say that Selina Kyle is also present in the story as both Kyle and as Catwoman, that Barbara Gordon is most of the time being pulled in various directions (her love for Harvey Dent, for her father, and her duty as a police sergeant).
There are some nice moments in this story, like showing how Bruce ends up with a giant penny in the Batcave (as in the comics), and his scenes with Winston at the mansion and in the cave.
The Harvey Dent stuff isn't as interesting (despite my always having been at least a bit curious as to how things would have gone with they'd stuck with Billy Dee Williams as Dent in the movies instead of re-casting the part in "Batman Forever" with Tommy Lee Jones). For one thing, we've seen the origin of Two-Face story told so many times by this point both in the comics and also in the various animated television series and films ("Batman Forever" and "The Dark Knight") that it's very hard to bring much of anything new that that story. And the seeds here to Dent's dual personality both prior to the accident and also after it are just not particularly convincing.
(There is an interesting moment, however, during a hallucination sequence where Dent believes it is many years later and he is governor and Barbara Gordon is the new Gotham police commissioner. She explains to him that he was right, that "Bruce Wayne flipped" and admitted to being the money man behind "a small army of mercenaries" playing as Batman. She shows him four photographs of men in the Batman costume without their masks and they are clearly meant to resemble fellow Batman film actors Val Kilmer, George Clooney, Christian Bale, and Ben Affleck.)
So, the story comes across as pretty average due to this and also due to Hamm trying to fit too much into it (Two-Face, Catwoman, the introductions of both Barbara Gordon and Drake Winston/Robin).
The art is what I would call "good overall but not great". Quiñones art here is more of a traditional movie adaptation style in the sense that it's drawn pretty much like he would draw any comic (I'd imagine) just with the faces just generally (sometimes vaguely) resembling the actors (unlike the "Superman '78" art by Wilfredo Torres which looks so much like the Superman movies that he had to have been making extensive use of photo references for the facial likenesses and even for characters posing like when showing Superman in flight).
I generally like both styles. Torres's "Superman '78" comes across as more visually exciting to me, though, than Quiñones's does. For one thing, Hamm's plotting is much "denser" here than Robert Venditti's "Superman '78's", as Quiñones' pages are crammed full of lots of little panels (many of them six or seven panels to a page). So, there's a lot more going on per page here than in "Superman '78", but there are also fewer exciting moments, visually speaking.
And, I hate to say it, but Quiñones' art is done no favors by how dark the artwork comes across in this story, the fault I suppose I have to put upon color artist Leonardo Ito. Now, I get that he was probably going for a tone reminiscent of the 1989 "Batman" film. However, his colors are *so* dark here in the many exterior night scenes and while taking place in the Batcave as to make much of Quiñones line art nearly impossible to make out. It's possible that this is some sort of production issue and not that of Ito's coloring (there are also a couple panels showing computer screens that are so small that it is impossible to read what's on the screen; I suspect this is a hold-over from when they thought this was going to be a "Digital First" release, where one would be viewing the story panel-by-panel enlarged to the size of one's phone or computer screen).
There is a lot of potential here and I suppose that "Batman '89" is probably a must read for die hard fans of the 1989 Tim Burton "Batman" movie. (Comic book direct market sales charts were still coming out at the time the first issues of "Batman '89" and "Superman '78" were coming out and, according to what I saw there, "Batman '89" #1 was ordered by comics shops and online comics retailers by around one hundred thousand copies more than they did "Superman '78" #1. Both first issues had many variant covers, so I have to presume it was just the general "Batman is cooler than Superman" mentality driving this, plus the fact that the Christopher Reeve Superman movies are cultural touchstones for comic book readers roughly my age (I turn 51 in three weeks; I was six years old when "Superman: The Movie" came out in 1978 and eight when "Superman II" in 1980) while the Michael Keaton "Batman" serves the same for a slightly younger generation just turning forty and I have to assume there are probably more forty-year-olds still buying monthly comic books than there are fifty-plus-year-olds. (I was seventeen years old when the 1989 "Batman" movie came out, so part way through high school. To me, the Michael Keaton "Batman" was a really cool new film but I never really thought of Keaton as *the* Batman actor of my generation as I had earlier with Christopher Reeve and Superman).
I gave "Batman '89" three out of five stars on GoodReads. I really hope that we get to see more of these "Batman '89" and "Superman '78" comics as both have potential for even better stories going forwards (and both have their own built-in audiences, the fans of the films). However, based on the previous similar tie-ins DC has done ("Batman '66", "Wonder Woman '77", and the CW "Arrowverse" tie-in series), they all seem to have pretty short runs. I believe "Batman '66" ran for the longest and most issues, including quite a few crossover mini-series with other tv characters like the Green Hornet, Steed and Mrs. Peel (the 1960s tv "Avengers"), the "Man from U.N.C.L.E.", and Lynda Carter's "Wonder Woman '77"....more
A few days ago, I finished reading "Superman '78" (2022, published by DC Comics), by Robert Venditti (writer), Wilfredo Torres (artist), Jordie BellaiA few days ago, I finished reading "Superman '78" (2022, published by DC Comics), by Robert Venditti (writer), Wilfredo Torres (artist), Jordie Bellaire (colorist), Dave Lanphear (letterer).
Reprints material originally released in single issue comic books format as "Superman '78" #1-6 (October 2021-March 2022. (Was originally announced to be a DC "Digital First" release starting in July 2021 and to run for twelve digital comic book chapters in that format prior to appearing in print, but the smaller digital release chapters apparently didn't end up happening.)
This hardcover collected edition has a cover by Wilfredo Torres and Jordie Bellaire, and also original issues cover art by Wilfredo Torres and Jordie Bellaire, Ben Oliver, Amy Reeder, Brad Walker and Nathan Fairbairn, Francis Manapul, Mikel Janin, Evan "Doc" Shaner, Bryan Hitch and Alex Sinclair, Lee Weeks, Chris Samnee and Giovanna Niro, Jamal Campbell, and Rafa Sandoval and Alejandro Sanchez. Also includes a seven page "Superman '78 Sketchbook" by Wilfredo Torres, and a one-page tribute page to "Superman: The Movie" director, Richard Donner (1930-2021).
Buoyed by the success of recent newly released original comic book series based on the 1966-1968 Adam West "Batman" television series (under the title "Batman '66") and 1975-1979 Lynda Carter television series ("Wonder Woman '77"), DC Comics took things to the next logical step and ventured in 2021 into telling original adventures of their two greatest motion picture renditions of their Superman and Batman characters, namely the Christopher Reeve "Superman: The Movie" (1978) and Michael Keaton "Batman" (1989) versions.
Prior to this, DC's only comic books featuring the Reeve and Keaton versions of their characters were single issue movie adaptations of "Superman III" (1983) and "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace" (1987)—there were no comic book or novel adaptations of "Superman: The Movie" (1978) or "Superman II" (1980) due to the deal made between Warner Bros. and original movie story writer, Mario Puzo—and single issue comic book adaptations of "Batman" (1989) and "Batman Returns" (1992) (and also the two subsequent Batman sequels that didn't star Michael Keaton, "Batman Forever" (1995) and "Batman and Robin" (1997). (These single issue comic book adaptations all came out in the same years as their respective movies.)
"Superman '78", this new story by Venditti, Torres, et al., clearly takes place after the events of "Superman: The Movie" and "Superman II" (but appears, just as the 2006 film, "Superman Returns", to disavow the events of "Superman III" and "Superman IV: The Quest for Peace", although it's possible that those events still took place prior to this story and are simply not referred to; there is a character in a few panels in street crowd scenes who very much resembles that of Richard Pryor's Gus Gorman character from "Superman III").
(Warning: Plot spoilers!) This story deals with the coming to Earth of Brainiac, a super advanced alien cybernetic being who travels the universe in his spaceship scooping up sample cities from planets on the brink of disaster, miniaturizing them, and storing them away in "bottles" aboard his ship. Brainiac believes that by doing so, he is preserving cultures about to go extinct (while at the same time imprisoning the inhabitants of those miniaturized cities).
One of his probe robots arrives on Earth first and comes into conflict with Superman, who easily defeats the robot but not before it can send a signal back to its master that there is a "Kryptonian infestation" on Earth needing to be removed. When Brainiac then arrives, Superman at first resists him. However, when Brainiac threatens to "excise" all of Metropolis, Superman surrenders and allows himself to be taken by Brainiac.
Aboard Brainiac's ship, Superman is miniaturized and put in one of the bottled cities where he discovers something he thought could not be possible, and entire Kryptonian city "saved" by Brainiac just before Krypton exploded. And-- again, spoilers!!! -- his birth parents are among them.
He resigns himself to his new life in this bottled city of Kandor, his powers gone due to the artificial red sun radiation inside the bottle and with seemingly no way to escape. That is, until Lois Lane makes a surprising and uneasy temporary alliance with none other than Lex Luthor ("the greatest criminal mind of our time", "the greatest criminal terror of our era", "the...") (Lois: "Enough with the self-styled nicknames!") to rescue Superman.
That's all I'll say about the plot. However, as a person who was six years old when the first Christopher Reeve move came out in 1978, and eight years old for "Superman II" in 1980 (which I recall as being one of the very first non animated movies I ever saw in a theater), *this* is a pure joy to read. Is the story all that original. No. We've had loads of Superman vs. Brainiac stories in the mainstream DC comics continuity. *This*, however, is like stepping back into a childhood memory, those cherished first two Superman movies of Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder, Gene Hackman, Jackie Cooper, Marc McClure, Marlon Brando, etc. Torres art style isn't "photo realistic", per se, but does a great job of capturing the spirit of the original actors (and at times does do amazingly accurate depictions of Kidder, Hackman, McClure, and Reeve).
My one slight criticism of Torres' art is that at times his action sequences are a bit hard to follow exactly what is happening. He'll have Superman standing there fighting Brainiac or Brainiac's robots with energy blasts surrounding him but it not being exactly clear just where the blasts are coming from (Superman or the robots) and where they are going (and if the robots are converging on Superman or falling backwards).
However, another thing Torres does very well is in how he depicts this Christopher Reeve inspired Superman in flight (generally a straighter flying position, as if "diving" through the air, as in the movies--as Reeve had to be positioned most of the time while in a flying harness in front of a blue screen--rather than how Superman is generally depicted as flying in the comics), and also in the use of his other powers (x-ray vision, heat vision, super cold "freeze" breath, etc.).
To younger readers (ones who were not brought up on the Christopher Reeve movies), this will read as just another of the many, many Superman stories they might come across, each giving them a different seeming version of the character. To someone like me who considers Christopher Reeve "my Superman" (no offense to 1950s television Superman, George Reeves, who I also watched as a child), this "Superman '78" is magical. I gave it four out of five stars on GoodReads.
(P.S.: Another really cool thing about this story and its the use of Brainiac as the villain is that it has been said that if there had been a fifth Christopher Reeve movie that it might have featured Brainiac, and many fans have wished ever since that we could have seen this. So, we finally now have a version of what that might have been like.)...more
Loading...
