Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
1 answer
191 views

Getting rid of the theta term in the standard electroweak theory

This has already been asked here more than once, but the existing answers do not tackle my misunderstanding. A topological $\theta$-term is understood to be physical, in the usual particle model ...
GaloisFan's user avatar
  • 1,742
0 votes
0 answers
75 views

How can we talk about the mass of $W^\pm$ bosons when they don't diagonalise the mass matrix?

In the electroweak lagrangian, after symmetry breaking we get $W^1_\mu,W^2\mu,W^3\mu$ and $B_\mu$ bosons. These fields don't however diagonalise the mass matrix $\frac{\partial^2V}{\partial\phi_i\...
acernine's user avatar
  • 248
2 votes
1 answer
294 views

Why standard model uses Lie groups like $SU(2)$ and not $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$?

First of all, the question is written in section $2)$. Also, I known that the $SU(2)$ group do not appears "alone" in standard model, rather, inside the Glashow-Salam-Weinberg model. 1) ...
M.N.Raia's user avatar
  • 3,085
0 votes
1 answer
224 views

What is the Mathematical description of Weak Interaction at low energies?

Introduction When I started to study gauge theory the mathematical road map seemed to be quite "simple". After all the concepts and notions about principal the differential geometry of fibre ...
M.N.Raia's user avatar
  • 3,085
0 votes
0 answers
63 views

Gauge Groups in Nature [duplicate]

It is well known that the relevant gauge groups appearing in particle physics are $U(1)$, $SU(2)$, and $SU(3)$. In many respects these are among the simplest Lie groups, such as in the dimension of ...
Patrick Vecera's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
256 views

Why do we demand $SU(2)$ and $SU(3)$ gauge invariance when we construct the standard model?

If one tries to verify the construction of the standard model, one has to find a Lagrangian that is invariant under $U(1)\times SU(2) \times SU(3)$. While it seems kind of logic that the Lagrangian ...
gamma's user avatar
  • 437
1 vote
2 answers
175 views

Can the weak interaction be studied without bothering the electromagnetic one?

It is well known that the electroweak interaction can be studied as a $SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y$ gauge theory. It is also known that the electromagnetic interaction is a $U(1)$ gauge theory, and it ...
Mauro Giliberti's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
131 views

$U(1)^{3} $ anomaly, trace of a hypercharge?

I have recently found the definition of the $U(1)^{3}$ anomaly as: $$\mathcal{A} = Tr[Y^{3}]_{L} -Tr[Y^{3}]_{R} $$ Where $Y$ is the hypercharge of the left, $L$ or right, $R$ components. What I don't ...
LieAlgebraGuy1999's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
373 views

Why $W^+$ and $W^-$ bosons counted as two types of particles? but not $e^+$ and $e^-$?

The $W^+$ and $W^-$ bosons have either a positive or negative electric charge of 1 elementary charge and are each other's antiparticles. In this sense, if we know the properties of $W^+$, we should ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
850 views

What precisely and mathematically does it mean to say gauge bosons as elementary particles?

In standard particle physics textbook, we say that photons, gluons and $W$ and $Z$ bosons are gauge bosons as elementary particles. However the gauge bosons are vector bosons and they carry the form ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
79 views

What precisely and mathematically does it mean to have $W$ bosons carry electric charges?

What precisely and mathematically does it mean to have $W$ bosons carry electric charges? We know from Wikipedia that experiments say that $W$ bosons carry electric charges: $W^\pm$ carry $+$ and $-$ ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
14 votes
4 answers
2k views

Haag's comment on the relation between fields and particles

I am very confused by the statement made in Haag's, Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras (page 46): ... the idea that to each particle there is a corresponding field and to each field a ...
Ivan Burbano's user avatar
  • 3,915
2 votes
0 answers
321 views

Anticommutator of gauge covariant derivatives

I must convert some dimension-6 operators I've obtained to the SILH base (ref: this, "Review of the SILH basis", CERN presentation by R. Contino). In this conversion I've got operators such ...
Lenz's user avatar
  • 127
1 vote
0 answers
42 views

Are there fermionic bound states that are gauge neutral to all gauge forces?

Puzzle: In our standard model particle physics, are there fermionic bound states that are gauge neutral to all gauge forces? Here we concern strong SU(3) color, electromagnetic U(1) EM, hyper U(1), ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
8 votes
3 answers
478 views

Are neutrons gauge neutral to all gauge forces?

Are neutrons gauge neutral to all gauge interactions? Neutron has mass, so it does couple to gravity. However, if we focus on the strong, electromagnetic EM, and weak forces, are there gauge ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar

15 30 50 per page