All Questions
26
questions
2
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Difference between the energy and the Hamiltonian in a specific example
The problem is the following:
Consider a particle of mass $m$ confined in a long and thin hollow pipe, which rotates in the $xy$ plane with constant angular velocity $\omega$. The rotation axis ...
2
votes
4
answers
1k
views
The definition of the hamiltonian in lagrangian mechanics
So going through the "Analytical Mechanics by Hand and Finch". In section 1.10 of the book, the Hamiltonian $H$ is defined as: $$H = \sum_k{\dot{q_k}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_k}} -L}.\tag{1.65}...
3
votes
1
answer
1k
views
General Form for Kinetic Energy Given Velocity Independent Potential such that $\mathcal{H}=E$
Suppose the potential energy is independent of $\dot{q},$ i.e $\frac{\partial V}{\partial\dot{q}}=0$. What is the most general form of the kinetic energy such that the Hamiltonian is the total energy? ...
19
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Why are Hamiltonian Mechanics well-defined?
I have encountered a problem while re-reading the formalism of Hamiltonian mechanics, and it lies in a very simple remark.
Indeed, if I am not mistaken, when we want to do mechanics using the ...
4
votes
2
answers
801
views
Liouville's theorem for systems with dissipation described by a single hamiltonian
Following this link, one can treat dissipation by using a factor $e^{\frac{t \beta}{ m}}$ in addition to the Lagrangian $L_0$ of a system without disspation:
$$
L[q, \dot{q}, t] = e^{\frac{t \beta}{ m}...
6
votes
1
answer
924
views
Independence of generalised coordinates and momenta in Hamiltonian mechanics [duplicate]
I am told that in Hamiltonian mechanics, we put the generalised coordinates $q_i$ and generalised momenta $p_i$ on equal footing, and treat them as being independent from one another. But I'm ...
4
votes
1
answer
806
views
Do time-invariant Hamiltonians define closed systems?
In classical mechanics, every time-invariant Hamiltonian represents a closed dynamical system?
Can every closed dynamical system be represented as a time-invariant Hamiltonian? Or are there closed ...
25
votes
3
answers
29k
views
Constructing Lagrangian from the Hamiltonian
Given the Lagrangian $L$ for a system, we can construct the Hamiltonian $H$ using the definition $H=\sum\limits_{i}p_i\dot{q}_i-L$ where $p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}$. Therefore, to ...
3
votes
0
answers
222
views
Does the additivity property of Integrals of motion and Lagrangians valid in all situations?
I would like to know if the additivity property of an integral (constant) of motion valid in all situations ? It works for energy but does it work for all other integrals of motion in all kinds of ...
8
votes
5
answers
716
views
Why can't we obtain a Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian by only substituting?
This question may sound a bit dumb. Why can't we obtain the Hamiltonian of a system simply by finding $\dot{q}$ in terms of $p$ and then evaluating the Lagrangian with $\dot{q} = \dot{q}(p)$? Wouldn't ...
10
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Is there a valid Lagrangian formulation for all classical systems?
Can one use the Lagrangian formalism for all classical systems, i.e. systems with a set of trajectories $\vec{x}_i(t)$ describing paths?
On the wikipedia page of Lagrangian mechanics, there is an ...