Skip to main content

All Questions

10 votes
3 answers
4k views

Is there a valid Lagrangian formulation for all classical systems?

Can one use the Lagrangian formalism for all classical systems, i.e. systems with a set of trajectories $\vec{x}_i(t)$ describing paths? On the wikipedia page of Lagrangian mechanics, there is an ...
Nikolaj-K's user avatar
  • 8,523
19 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why are Hamiltonian Mechanics well-defined?

I have encountered a problem while re-reading the formalism of Hamiltonian mechanics, and it lies in a very simple remark. Indeed, if I am not mistaken, when we want to do mechanics using the ...
Frotaur's user avatar
  • 2,296
25 votes
3 answers
29k views

Constructing Lagrangian from the Hamiltonian

Given the Lagrangian $L$ for a system, we can construct the Hamiltonian $H$ using the definition $H=\sum\limits_{i}p_i\dot{q}_i-L$ where $p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}$. Therefore, to ...
SRS's user avatar
  • 26.8k
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

Difference between the energy and the Hamiltonian in a specific example

The problem is the following: Consider a particle of mass $m$ confined in a long and thin hollow pipe, which rotates in the $xy$ plane with constant angular velocity $\omega$. The rotation axis ...
Slayer147's user avatar
  • 1,045
8 votes
5 answers
716 views

Why can't we obtain a Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian by only substituting?

This question may sound a bit dumb. Why can't we obtain the Hamiltonian of a system simply by finding $\dot{q}$ in terms of $p$ and then evaluating the Lagrangian with $\dot{q} = \dot{q}(p)$? Wouldn't ...
carllacan's user avatar
  • 590