Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
2 answers
63 views

Approximation of Small Perturbation [closed]

From Morin's Classical Mechanics, on the chapter of Small Oscillations in Lagrangian Mechanics, he does this approximation on the last equality, I don't understand what happened there. I get the first ...
Lyu's user avatar
  • 109
1 vote
2 answers
158 views

Coordinate basis vectors on tangent bundle (extrinsic view)

Short Version: when we say that $(\pmb{q},\pmb{u}):TQ_{(q)}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}$ are local coordinates for the tangent bundle of $Q$, which can be viewed as an embedded submanifold of a higher ...
J Peterson's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
270 views

Having trouble deriving the exact form of the Kinematic Transport Theorem

The Kinematic transport theorem is a very basic theorem relating time derivatives of vectors between a non rotating frame and another one that's rotating with respect to it with a uniform angular ...
Amit's user avatar
  • 1,450
1 vote
1 answer
33 views

Derivatives of the lagrangian of generalized coordinates [closed]

I know that $$U= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j,k} A_{jk} q_j q_k \quad \quad T= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j,k} m_{jk} \dot{q}_j \dot{q}_k $$ and the lagrangian is $$ \frac{\partial U}{\partial q_k} - \frac{d}{dt} \...
rannasquaer's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
54 views

What does this vertical line notation mean?

Here is the definition of the Noether momentum in my script. $$I = \left.\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} \frac{d x}{d \alpha} \right|_{\alpha=0} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} = m \dot{x} = ...
Lambda's user avatar
  • 85
1 vote
1 answer
93 views

How to define differentiation of a time-dependent vectors with respect to a specific reference frame in a coordinate-free manner?

It is usual in classical mechanics to introduce the derivative of a time-dependent vector with respect to a reference frame. This is accomplished through the use of a basis that is fixed with respect ...
jvf's user avatar
  • 245
1 vote
1 answer
114 views

Is the order of ordinary derivatives interchangeable in classical mechanics?

I am having trouble with a term that arises in a physics equation (deriving the Lagrange equation for one particle in one generalized coordinate, $q$, dimension from one Cartesian direction, $x$). My ...
user2721127's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
73 views

Deriving Euler-Lagrange equation [duplicate]

I have derive the Euler-Lagrange equation which is equation (2) for a condition in which generalised velocity is independent on the generalised coordinate but when generalised velocity is dependent on ...
Keshav Shrestha's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
143 views

Question regarding Energy Interaction of two particles

https://i.sstatic.net/LUsKX.jpg To give a context as to what I'm asking here ,I am talking about the energy of a two particle system (section 4.9 Taylor's Classical Mechanics) . My question is what ...
Harry Case's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
131 views

Questions regarding the derivation of Euler-Lagrange Equation from Taylor's Classical Mechanics

I'm self-studying classical mechanics from Taylor's book. I saw his derivation of the Euler-Lagrange Equation and I'm confused about something, he created a 'wrong' function $$Y(x) = y(x)+\eta(x)\tag{...
user1070087's user avatar
0 votes
3 answers
432 views

Goldstein: derivation of work-energy theorem

I am reading "Classical Mechanics-Third Edition; Herbert Goldstein, Charles P. Poole, John L. Safko" and in the first chapter I came across the work-energy theorem (paraphrased) as follows: ...
ananta's user avatar
  • 232
2 votes
1 answer
62 views

Implications of Galilei-Invariance on a time-independent potential

I'm trying to compute a result shown in my classical mechanics lecture on my own. Namely, consider that a system composed of $n$ particles follows a law of force $m_k\ddot{\vec{x_k}} = \vec{F_k}(\vec{...
Tomas Noguera's user avatar
6 votes
7 answers
229 views

Is every $dm$ piece unequal when using integration of a non-uniformly dense object?

When we want to find the total charge of an object or total mass, usually we start off with a setup such as: $$ m = \int dm \:\;\:\text{or} \:\;\:q = \int dq$$ in which we then use (and to keep it ...
Gino Gamboni's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
615 views

Proof that the Euler-Lagrange equations hold in any set of coordinates if they hold in one

This is a question about a specific proof presented in the book Introduction to Classical Mechanics by David Morin. I have highlighted the relevant portion in the picture below. In the remark, he ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
125 views

Velocities - Equation 1.46 of Goldstein 3rd edition

In his derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations from D'Alembert's principle, Goldstein uses the parametrization (equation 1.45') $$\displaystyle{\vec{r_i}=\vec{r_i}(q_1,q_2, ..., q_n, t)}\tag{1.45'}$...
Daniel's user avatar
  • 113

15 30 50 per page
1
2
3 4 5
9