Skip to main content

All Questions

6 votes
3 answers
1k views

In equation (3) from lecture 7 in Leonard Susskind’s ‘Classical Mechanics’, should the derivatives be partial?

Here are the equations. ($V$ represents a potential function and $p$ represents momentum.) $$V(q_1,q_2) = V(aq_1 - bq_2)$$ $$\dot{p}_1 = -aV'(aq_1 - bq_2)$$ $$\dot{p}_2 = +bV'(aq_1 - bq_2)$$ Should ...
Bradley Peacock's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
126 views

On Landaus&Lifshitz's derivation of the lagrangian of a free particle [duplicate]

I'm reading the first pages of Landaus&Lifshitz's Mechanics tome. I'm looking for some clarification on the derivation of the Lagrange function for the mechanical system composed of a single free ...
GeometriaDifferenziale's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
64 views

Material to Study the Definition, Algebra, and Use of Infinitesimals in Physics [closed]

This is going to be a rather general question about suggestions on best supplementary material to properly explain the use of infinitesimals (or differentials?) for the purposes of integration or ...
0 votes
1 answer
74 views

Derivation of lagrange equation in classical mechanics

I'm currently working on classical mechanics and I am stuck in a part of the derivation of the lagrange equation with generalized coordinates. I just cant figure it out and don't know if it's just ...
Jan Oreel's user avatar
2 votes
5 answers
261 views

Why does $\vec{r}\cdot\dot{\vec{r}}=r\dot{r}$?

Why is $$\vec{r}\cdot\dot{\vec{r}}=r\dot {r}$$ true? Before saying anything, I have seen the proofs using spherical coordinates for $$\dot{\vec {r}}= \dot{r}\vec{u_r}+r\dot{\theta}\vec{u_\theta}+r\sin\...
Ulshy's user avatar
  • 69
1 vote
2 answers
118 views

Lagrangian total time derivative - continues second-order differential

In the lagrangian, adding total time derivative doesn't change equation of motion. $$L' = L + \frac{d}{dt}f(q,t).$$ After playing with it, I realize that this is only true if the $f(q,t)$ function has ...
Giorgi's user avatar
  • 525
1 vote
1 answer
48 views

Lagrangian for 2 inertial frames where only Speed is different by small amount

In Landau & Liftshitz’s book p.5, they go ahead and writes down lagrangians for 2 different inertial frames. They say that Lagrangian is a function of $v^2$. So in one frame, we got $L(v^2)$. In ...
Giorgi's user avatar
  • 525
-1 votes
1 answer
158 views

Recommended physics book(s) that uses calculus and have difficult problems [closed]

What physics book(s) uses calculus and has complex problems (undergrad/olympiad level)? Context: I've read "Fundamentals of Physics by Halliday and Resnick" and I found the problems to be ...
0 votes
2 answers
129 views

Does the gradient of potential energy exist independent of coordinates?

Potential energy $U(\vec{r})$ of a conservative force field $\vec{F}$ is defined as a function whose variation between positions $\vec{r}_A$ and $\vec{r}_B$ is the opposite of the work done by the ...
Antonio19932806's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
63 views

Approximation of Small Perturbation [closed]

From Morin's Classical Mechanics, on the chapter of Small Oscillations in Lagrangian Mechanics, he does this approximation on the last equality, I don't understand what happened there. I get the first ...
Lyu's user avatar
  • 109
0 votes
0 answers
111 views

Question on non-holonomic constraints (This is different to the others)

I know there are many posts on non-holonomic constraints and also many on this exact one but I feel that there is still some confusion on it. "Consider a disk which rolls without slipping across ...
Reuben's user avatar
  • 283
1 vote
1 answer
33 views

Derivatives of the lagrangian of generalized coordinates [closed]

I know that $$U= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j,k} A_{jk} q_j q_k \quad \quad T= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j,k} m_{jk} \dot{q}_j \dot{q}_k $$ and the lagrangian is $$ \frac{\partial U}{\partial q_k} - \frac{d}{dt} \...
rannasquaer's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
54 views

What does this vertical line notation mean?

Here is the definition of the Noether momentum in my script. $$I = \left.\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} \frac{d x}{d \alpha} \right|_{\alpha=0} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} = m \dot{x} = ...
Lambda's user avatar
  • 85
0 votes
1 answer
162 views

The derivative of rotational kinetic energy in terms of period gives me the wrong answer. Why should I use the product rule? [closed]

This is my first question here so I hope I do it correctly. I've tried to solve this, and google it, but I can't find the answer to this particular question. This equation comes from Carroll and ...
Cre Henge's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
922 views

Rigorously prove the period of small oscillations by directly integrating

This answer proved that $$\lim_{E\to E_0}2\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\frac{\mathrm dx}{\sqrt{2\left(E-U\!\left(x\right)\right)}}=\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{U''\!\left(x_0\right)}},$$ where $E_0:=U\!\left(x_0\right)$ is a ...
Ulysses Zhan's user avatar

15 30 50 per page