Skip to main content

All Questions

3 votes
15 answers
2k views

Proof for the absence of free will?

EDIT (17/08/2022): I have answered this question with an evolution of the argument. See accepted answer below. There are a number of arguments which aim to prove the impossibility of free will. The ...
Futilitarian's user avatar
  • 4,439
4 votes
2 answers
227 views

Are retorsion arguments in epistemology generally problematic?

An retorsion argument consists in pointing out how a claim is self-defeating. Of course, I accept that there are sound arguments of this type that don't misrepresent the original position. But they ...
viuser's user avatar
  • 4,841
3 votes
9 answers
3k views

What is the burden of proof? Has this principle ever been challenged?

I have been surprised to find that some people doubt this principle. Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat - the burden of proof lies with the speaker, not with the one who negates. I ...
Meanach's user avatar
  • 2,341
6 votes
2 answers
3k views

How does one differentiate epistemological and ontological claims?

I'm taking an introductory philosophy course and I find it fascinating. I can't really figure out an assignment though because I'm a bit foggy on what the difference between ontological and ...
Annie's user avatar
  • 61
3 votes
9 answers
601 views

How can we decide which view to accept concerning our ultimate justification of our knowledge (Münchhausen trilemma)?

I recently came across the Münchhausen trilemma, which I think helps to explain my question. Basically, according to the trilemma, we have three options for explaining the ultimate justification of ...
Chris's user avatar
  • 296