Skip to main content

Questions tagged [enriched-category-theory]

The tag has no usage guidance.

5 votes
0 answers
75 views

Free cocompletion of a 2-category under pseudo colimits, lax colimits, and colax colimits

Let $\mathscr K$ be a small 2-category. It follows from $\mathrm{Cat}$-enriched category theory that the free cocompletion of $\mathscr K$ under strict 2-colimits of 2-functors is given by the 2-...
varkor's user avatar
  • 9,521
3 votes
0 answers
66 views

Enriched tensor product of chain complexes

Question (idea): Is there a notion of tensor product of chain complexes in a $\mathcal{V}$-enriched monoidal category $\mathcal{C}$, for $\mathcal{V}$ a linear symmetric monoidal category? Let me ...
Léo S.'s user avatar
  • 193
0 votes
0 answers
65 views

Automorphism groups for simple objects in abelian linear categories

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category that is also $k$-linear, where $k$ is some algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a simple object in $\mathcal{A}$. What can we say about $\mathrm{Aut}(X)$? I ...
Bobby-John Wilson's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
246 views

Is there a correction to the failure of geometric morphisms to preserve internal homs?

Given a geometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ where $\mathscr{F},\mathscr{E}$ are toposes, we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have ...
Cameron's user avatar
  • 121
4 votes
1 answer
114 views

Interpreting a diagram in Borceux-Quinteiro's paper on enriched sheaves

I am somewhat new to working with enriched categories, and have a question about how to interpret Definition 1.2 in Borceux-Quinteiro's paper A theory of enriched sheaves. The authors consider a ...
memento morison's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
217 views

Large V-categories admitting the construction of V-presheaves

By a result of Foltz, and Freyd and Street, a category $C$ is essentially small (i.e. equivalent to a small category) if and only if both $C$ and $[C^{\text{op}}, \mathrm{Set}]$ are locally small. I ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 9,521
3 votes
0 answers
58 views

Self-enrichment for a closed monoidal bicategory

First, there are two possible generalization of the notion of closed category, vertical and horizontal. I'm interested in the vertical one, something saying, I guess, that a monoidal bicategory $\...
Nikio's user avatar
  • 351
5 votes
1 answer
371 views

Day convolution and sheafification

$\DeclareMathOperator\Psh{Psh}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}\newcommand\copower{\mathrm{copower}}$I was looking through Bodil Biering's thesis On the Logic of Bunched Implications - and its relation to ...
Anthony D'Arienzo's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
232 views

Can every weighted colimit in a $\mathbf{Pos}$-enriched category be rephrased as a conical colimit?

For ordinary category theory, we have the following fact. A weighted colimit of a functor can always be equivalently expressed as a colimit of a different functor. Specifically, the weighted colimit ...
Nick Hu's user avatar
  • 161
2 votes
0 answers
129 views

Tensor product of objectwise weak homotopy equivalences of $\mathcal{M}$-spaces

I consider the enriched category $[\mathcal{M}^{op},\mathrm{Top}]$ of enriched functors (I call them $\mathcal{M}$-spaces) from the enriched small category $\mathcal{M}^{op}$ to the enriched category $...
Philippe Gaucher's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
74 views

Are $\mathscr{V}$-modules uniquely (nicely) enrichable?

$\require{AMScd}\newcommand{\V}{\mathscr{V}}\newcommand{\M}{\mathcal{M}}\newcommand{\hom}{\operatorname{hom}}\newcommand{\op}{{^\mathsf{op}}}$Fix a closed symmetric monoidal category $(\V;\otimes;\...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 871
3 votes
1 answer
185 views

Enriched cofibrant replacement in spectrally enriched categories

If $\mathcal{V}$ is a monoidal model category with all objects cofibrant, Theorem 13.5.2. of Categorical Homotopy Theory will guarantee that the functorial cofibrant replacement of a $\mathcal{V}$-...
Connor Malin's user avatar
  • 5,511
0 votes
1 answer
241 views

Free enriched monoidal categories

Suppose $(\mathcal{V},\otimes,1)$ is a symmetric monoidal category and $\mathbb{C}$ is a $\mathcal{V}$-category. I will deliberately avoid usual powerful assumptions (eg completeness/cocompleteness) ...
Morgan Rogers's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
104 views

Understanding this (standard?) notion of enriched product category

$\newcommand{\V}{\mathscr{V}}\newcommand{\A}{\mathcal{A}}\newcommand{\B}{\mathcal{B}}\newcommand{\C}{\mathcal{C}}$Fix a closed symmetric monoidal category $\V$, writing the product as $\otimes$, the ...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 871
7 votes
1 answer
144 views

Preservation of lax limits in categories of functors and lax natural transformations

Let $f:\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{D}$ be a functor of 2-categories and let $\operatorname{Fun}(\mathbb{C},\operatorname{Cat})^{\operatorname{lax}}$ denote the 2-category of functors and lax natural ...
Abellan's user avatar
  • 295
8 votes
2 answers
441 views

Condition for an equivalence of functor categories to imply an equivalence of categories

Given small categories $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$, we have that $[\mathcal{C}^\text{op},\textbf{Set}]\simeq[\mathcal{D}^\text{op},\textbf{Set}]$ if and only if the Cauchy-completions of $\...
Cameron's user avatar
  • 121
2 votes
1 answer
121 views

Can we do away with cotensors when exploring the equivalence between closed $\mathscr{V}$-modules and strongly tensored $\mathscr{V}$-categories?

$\newcommand{\M}{\mathcal{M}}\newcommand{\ML}{\underline{\mathcal{M}}}\newcommand{\N}{\mathcal{N}}\newcommand{\NL}{\underline{\mathcal{N}}}\newcommand{\V}{\mathscr{V}}\newcommand{\VL}{\underline{\...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 871
6 votes
1 answer
852 views

Are algebroids "just matrices"?

$\DeclareMathOperator\Vect{Vect}\DeclareMathOperator\Mat{Mat}$This question was originally asked on MSE but may be better here. Algebroids are particularly interesting structures: they are basically ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
421 views

Why are enriched (co)ends defined like that?

I'm mainly following references such as Kelly, Loregian and the nLab, and it seems customary there to generalize (co)ends to the enriched context (over a symmetric monoidal category $\mathcal{V}$) by ...
Nikio's user avatar
  • 351
3 votes
0 answers
75 views

Conditions for natural transformations of weights to induce adjunctions of weighted limits

Suppose we have: -) A $2$-category $\mathsf{J}$ -) A natural transformation of $\alpha : M \Longrightarrow W : \mathsf{J} \longrightarrow \mathsf{Cat}$ -) A functor $X:\mathsf{J} \longrightarrow \...
theAdmiral's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
408 views

Why do we need enriched model categories?

As far as I understand, model categories mainly provide tools for studying the "homotopy theories" (that is, $\infty$-categories) that are ubiquitous in mathematics. From this point of view, ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
104 views

Finite groups acting on algebraic groups and representations

Let $H$ be a connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field $k$, and $I$ a finite group which acts on $H$ through group scheme morphisms. Denote by $Rep(H)$ the category of finite ...
SoruMuz's user avatar
  • 11
8 votes
0 answers
503 views

Condensed categories vs categories (co)tensored with condensed sets

I am not sure how to solve set-theoretic issues properly, so let me first ignore them. There are two notions, probably closely related: Condensed categories, i.e. condensed objects in the category of ...
Z. M's user avatar
  • 2,446
2 votes
2 answers
527 views

Can a category be enriched over abelian groups in more than one way?

An $\mathbf{Ab}$-category is a category enriched over the category of abelian groups. What is an example of a category that can be enriched over abelian groups in more than one way? An abelian ...
Didier de Montblazon's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
99 views

Cocompleteness of enriched categories of algebras

A useful result due to Linton is that for a cocomplete category $C$ and monad $T$ on $C$, if the category of algebras $C^T$ admits reflexive coequalisers, then it is cocomplete (see here for a sketch ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 9,521
10 votes
0 answers
122 views

V-categories enriched in a monoidal V-category

In an email to the categories mailing list dated 21 August 2003, Street writes: Max reminded me of his old result (not in the LaJolla Proceedings, but known soon after) that a monoidal V-category is ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 9,521
2 votes
0 answers
118 views

Are homotopy colimits strict?

Let's say we are working with a fibrant simplicially enriched category $\mathbf{B}$ that has all limits and all homotopy limits, and let $\mathbf{A}$ be a full subcategory that is closed under weak ...
Giulio Lo Monaco's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
198 views

Strictification of $\mathcal{V}$-pseudofunctors

Let $\mathcal{B}$ be a bicategory. Section 4.10 of Gordon, Power and Street's paper "Coherence for Tricategories" states that there is a bicategory $\textbf{st}\mathcal{B}$ and a ...
Zbyszek's user avatar
  • 23
12 votes
1 answer
371 views

What is the right notion of a functor from an internal topological category to a topologically enriched category?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category internal to (some convenient model for) topological spaces (which I will denote by $\mathsf{Top}$). In the question Greg Arone asks: What is the correct notion of a ...
Niall Taggart's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
54 views

Reference request for facts about bi(co)descent objects

I know the following facts are true, but I struggle to find adequate references for them: Let $T$ be a pseudo-monad on a bicategory $\mathcal{C}$, and let $A$, $B$ be pseudo-algebras for $T$. Then, ...
JeCl's user avatar
  • 1,001

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5