Skip to main content

Questions tagged [higher-category-theory]

For questions involving one or more categorical dimensions, or involving homotopy coherent categorical structures.

2 votes
0 answers
66 views

The infinity category of dg-categories is bicomplete

We can define the $\infty$-category of dg-categories $dgCat_\infty$ as the definition of the $\infty$-category of $\infty$-categories which given gy the section.3 of J.Lurie "Higher Topos Theory&...
Keima's user avatar
  • 91
1 vote
1 answer
207 views

Notion of $\kappa$-sifted categories?

Let $\kappa$ be a regular cardinal. It seems reasonable to introduce the following definition: Definition. A simplicial set $K$ is $\kappa$-sifted if, for every set $E$ with $\lvert E\rvert<\kappa$...
Z. M's user avatar
  • 2,271
3 votes
1 answer
116 views

Double category of monads and pseudo monad-morphisms

We can construct bicategories of monads in a bicategory $B$, $Mnd_l(B)$/$Mnd_c(B)$ with lax and colax monad-morphisms respectively. I am failing to find a good notion of pseudo monad-morphisms. Is ...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 903
-2 votes
0 answers
192 views

Is physics limited to smooth sets? [closed]

Good day, I have come across lectures about Higher Topos Theory in mathematical physics and I am wondering about the explicit restriction to the category of smooth sets. Why should the potentially ...
Pan Mrož's user avatar
  • 185
8 votes
1 answer
351 views

Pushouts vs contractible colimits

Suppose that $C$ has all weakly contractible colimits, i.e. colimits of functors $F: I \rightarrow C$ where the geometric realization $|I|$ is weakly contractible. Then $C$ has pushouts and filtered ...
user39598's user avatar
  • 431
3 votes
1 answer
155 views

Morita equivalence of Lie groupoids and isomorphism of differentiable stacks

It's a well known fact two Lie groupoids are Morita-equivalent iff they induce isomorphic differentiable stacks (I'll call this statement "(1)"). It's also well known that there is a ...
Kandinskij's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
204 views

$\operatorname{Fun}(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{D})^n$ is a subcategory of $\operatorname{Fun}(\mathcal{C}^n,\mathcal{D}^n)$

Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be $\infty$-categories (by which I mean quasicategories, though I suspect that it hardly matters), and let $n\geq 1$ be an integer. There is a functor $$\theta:\...
Ken's user avatar
  • 1,979
7 votes
0 answers
89 views

The Barr-Kock lemma for regular 2-categories

There is a nice result for regular 1-categories, which I quote from page 441 of Borceux & Bourn's textbook "Mal'cev, Protomodular, Homological and Semi-Abelian Categories". This is ...
Cory Gillette's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
104 views

Presentation of double categories as algebras for a monad on an inverse category and its virtualisation

This question is motivated by the theory of walking structures and computads. Namely see the end of the linked paragraph on computads over at nlab: For example, if $\mathcal{J} = \mathcal{P}\times \...
Ilk's user avatar
  • 903
7 votes
0 answers
163 views

Simplicial right Kan extensions and Cartesian transformations

I will write the concrete question first, in case the answer is clear independently of the context: Question: Given an $\infty$-topos $\mathfrak{X}$ and a diagram $F\colon\Delta^1\times\Delta_+^{op}\...
Jonathan Beardsley's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
228 views

Reference: the category of derived affine schemes is extensive

The category (that is, $(\infty, 1)$-category) of derived affine schemes is the opposite category of the localization of simplicial commutative rings in weak equivalences. See extensive category. Does ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
179 views

Derived functors from localization vs animation

I got a bit confused with the derived functors getting from the localization and the animation. More specifically, let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category generated by compact projective objects $\...
Johnny's user avatar
  • 225
7 votes
1 answer
143 views

What's the localization of the $\infty$-category of categories under inverting final functors?

The colimit is preserved under pulling back diagrams by a final functor. This could loosely be considered as giving some notion of two categories specifying the same sort of colimit (but since I don't ...
Charles Wang's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
252 views

Are adjoints closed under pushouts?

The category $PrL$ of locally presentable categories has all colimits. In particular, if $A_1 \leftarrow A_0 \rightarrow A_2$ is a diagram of presentable categories, with left adjoint functors between ...
user39598's user avatar
  • 431
6 votes
0 answers
113 views

Treatment of classes of mono/epi morphisms in $(\infty, 1)$-categories

In the classical theory of $(1, 1)$ categories, the chain of classes of mono/epi morphisms is well known: plain $\leftarrow$ strong $\leftarrow$ effective $\leftarrow$split ((I assume that the ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
90