Questions tagged [derived-functors]
The derived-functors tag has no usage guidance.
149
questions
4
votes
0
answers
232
views
On a simple alternative correction to Roos' theorem on $\varprojlim^1$
Here is a discussion about an incorrect theorem of Roos, later corrected, some counterexamples and so on. Reading over this, I was a bit shocked because it contradicted something from Weibel's ...
2
votes
0
answers
87
views
Minimal injective resolution and change of rings
Let $R$ be a commutative Noetherian ring. For an $R$-module $M$, let $0\to E^0_R(M)\to E^1_R(M)\to \ldots $ denote the minimal injective resolution of $M$. I have two questions:
(1) If $I$ is an ...
9
votes
1
answer
246
views
Is there a correction to the failure of geometric morphisms to preserve internal homs?
Given a geometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ where $\mathscr{F},\mathscr{E}$ are toposes, we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have ...
1
vote
1
answer
316
views
Does anyone have a good example of an injective resolution?
I'm learning about injective resolutions and derived functor sheaf cohomology, and it seems that every source on injective resolutions gives no examples. I feel like just one good example would make ...
3
votes
1
answer
144
views
(Derived category of) sheaves over an infinite union
The short version of my question is:
Suppose $X$ is a (reasonably nice) topological space such that $X = \bigcup_{n \ge 1} X_n$ for an increasing sequence of (closed) subspaces $X_1 \subset X_2 \...
3
votes
1
answer
176
views
Image, upto direct summands, of derived push-forward of resolution of singularities
Let $\mathcal C$ be a full subcategory (closed under isomorphism also) of an additive category $\mathcal A$. Then, $\text{add}(\mathcal C)$ is the full subcategory of $\mathcal A$ consisting of all ...
3
votes
1
answer
227
views
Higher direct images along proper morphisms in the non-Noetherian setting
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finitely presented proper morphism. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. Do the functors $R^i f_* \mathcal{F}$ preserve any of the following properties:
(1) ...
2
votes
1
answer
94
views
A perfect complex over a local Cohen--Macaulay ring whose canonical dual is concentrated in a single degree
Let $R$ be a complete local Cohen--Macaulay ring with dualizing module $\omega$. Let $M$ be a perfect complex over $R$. If the homology of $\mathbf R\text{Hom}_R(M,\omega)$ is concentrated in a ...
3
votes
1
answer
228
views
Vanishing of $\operatorname{Ext}_R^{1}(M,R)$ when $R$ is a Gorenstein local ring of dimension $1$ and $M$ is not finitely generated
Let $(R,\mathfrak m)$ be a Gorenstein local ring of dimension $1$. Let $M$ be an $R$-module (not finitely generated) such that $M\neq \mathfrak m M$ and there exists a non-zero-divisor $x\in \mathfrak ...
2
votes
1
answer
100
views
derived completion and flat base change
Let $f:A \to B$ be a flat morphism of commutative $p$-adic completely rings.
We denote by $D_{\text{comp}}(A)$ the derived category of complexes over $A$, which is derived $p$-adic complete.
For a ...
0
votes
0
answers
107
views
Basis of Lambda algebra for a programmer
First of all, I'm not a specialist in alg. top., but I try to apply computational math to it, so if I'm wrong in something you'd be doing a better thing explaining it to me instead of blaming me :) ...
1
vote
0
answers
203
views
left integration of functor in the category of groups
Assume that a functor on the category of groups vanishes on all projective objects. Is it necessarily the left derived functor of a half exact functor on this category?
2
votes
2
answers
364
views
Proper birational morphism from a Gorenstein normal scheme to a normal local domain, with trivial higher direct images, implies Cohen-Macaulay?
Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $0$. Let $R$ be a Noetherian local normal domain containing $k$. Also assume that $R$ is the homomorphic image of a Gorenstein ring of finite dimension, hence $R$ ...
3
votes
0
answers
132
views
Does a functor preserving injectives also preserve K-injective complexes?
Let $F:A\to B$ be an exact functor of Grothendieck abelian categories. If $F$ preserves injective objects, then does the exact functor $F:K(A)\to K(B)$ preserves K-injective complexes?
For example, ...
2
votes
1
answer
169
views
Non-cofiltered derived limits
As far as I know, the inverse limit and its derived functors can be defined even in case we are dealing with a functor $F: I \to A$ from a category $I$ that is not cofiltered. I would content myself ...